CTA Case No. 2220 (Decision)

Hl 'l'H TC 0 ,I " CUL'H" PPEALcl QUEZOt T C.ITY ... - t .. .. .(.~2 "' �.... � � (,:; !� .- llo - - -.. .. ... -- �- 4(_47s 11 r t iii s � i- ' .. i I' !' 207

�, '( ''' ~' 1. (' ' - l.l.ce l 0 in 0 2 t.fo,l . !) 31 re JUly l t� l 68 b re � nJAS , n 1la r1 l, ct '& Q (,1 t 1� t e �c u. .. o. .v- l!i~, l' ' Ii o, lnc -. "V ' . i'h 0 s~i~l)..;~l ev. t "-' � T� "2'+5 , �e � 19, oit d t-nere ' . ) ~m appe tro 1 r y L- ~_f}~~~?.4_,fi~.___ _) � v~.~~ � �._., tntALI �~re 'id.inG JU~J.f.t tt ,. vi:. ,4. t\ ll�Ci.l.)a �ji ~�oeiet Juag . . � . I lr . i.� 208 {,