CTA Case No. 334 (Decision)
.u Ai:' EA.LS � � ..- � � � � 408
. UI '. � .1. � A - ... f s Buil n 6 5. ). .. ' urn �������� � , .... ~. ., 156.. la:r:d T���t J. .. p .. T.1:x aJ L1�ftc yh n, !� 409
e. 1 - � � � 1� � t �� 1 � 410
�� ... '(1 n ���� ..�.�.�.~.�...�.�.�.�.�..� 17 1 u � '* X f it uf ak 1tl 0 lo tatn � tit .1:" t , .1 ) ( ,, � �1 - al 1 �� c .': 411 _____ L~--��-------~~�----_.
- I � ... I T. not I � . 0 ttlto n � .) "� (). ld 1 t ...... h u n .... v 11 1rd h on n t proi1 of � . lue � " a 1 1: . te tUX' f ... clere a lo& Ol t 1 al oi t� .�"r' l :ly � t c toll t
- � ���� �J ly � � � �� ,. 413
0� tt ~ al o.f:t .., ., the � 1 nd ~ o, 774., 1 1 � ot.- !n h ' a. � is i .ton of � , ., CT al f " ,.. . w. ich l h rop � '1111 ac:q ir d p: tit!; n f a � \,; .or n 1 1 n ll 1:' e r o:r ti J � �� Ci.l~ I .). ( t .. .... c. P� 1 .a. ) (lix � -\. C tQ the workah t p ltJl)�.
� .. - �� .. - ) .. � { � � ( � I � � ��� � v ���������� ������ �� ����� ���� � � 415 .. - ~�~----------~~~ -----------------~~ --~
�� �� 1� � � ',' ( � � 416
- � � � � � � � 41 7
� � � 418 ! l
� � � 419
� 1 � () � � 420
r � 421
� ] � � � � � 422
f I I �� f . ltl - ~ l ~ i � reva}- I � 1: 423
f 1 f.t � U$GfU f 0 ..~... t~ ... � t "' - ... l 1� h ol. uU.-tn J +;,, f of h 1. u I �- on 1 � I' / 0 t. J 0 I - ve t : ~ 1~"�1.h."' , ,. ... . h1 h- 1 ti - el:' _.t _t t Ut to � � 424
1- � � 1 � 425
. .... ~t 1t b:' ldt - h t Ut P �l.s: t � . �t� lt i. v r, �o ~ :P- r~o !.nt� n lot\ tlii . HI I t '1Ki1!11t:..HU. l n� � � �. .;r: ,- 0 tan � 1'�x u. z.�~-u~a �on ent plJ $ .. f 1n � .tldl fttra .� ~o � G� ptnrtton� . R: .c,c~J;. so.rl! �ildi.nQ o � tn y .;;J tI � " 426 �--�--"'-- . -~
� 1 � � � � - � 427
� - n t oo short . � ... , � � � - J I 428
l l 1 � � 1, 429
I ! I t - 0t -u . le t� , .. ' r _� � ~- t . � l t v r. n �- cl>J.l f . .. -a��J �s 1 nt.� t! ... �nd p - �i : d .., � u - 1 1""' )~ " .,..., t~'� f �� t' f.10'l" !' f lt. h~rG o~ ... . H'Jt.lld be pr. per th ... � �p ld ,. .;- <it. 1b f ,t, tt-d*nt auld in t ... � ni � '� ... .~c;...,t~ - ox� th o. U;t Y'" .J �'t. c.t til: � 430
.. I I' � � � � were real- � 431
. � - t ..... ���������� �� �� �� .. ..�.�. � � ������������� ������ ����� ����������������� 4"< �� � � ���� ��..�..�.�.�.. .�..� ���� ���� � �� ���� ���� � � �� ���� � �� . � ����� ����� � �� �� ����� . ��............... � ���� �� ��� � ���� �� ��� X � �� � � 432
����������� � ������ � ���� .. .. ���� �������� �� � � � �� � � � � 43 3
� 1 � -�-� -........... i' 434
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 6566 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6566)
- ZUELLIG PHARMA ASIA PACIFIC LTD. PHILS. ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1795)
- NATIONAL GRID CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES v. CENTRAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS; LOCAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS OF THE PROVINCE OF SOUTH COTABATO; ENGR. ROBERT DEANON, in his official capacity as the OIC-Provincial Assessor of South Cotabato and HERBERT C. JUGADOR, in his capacity as Municipal Assessor of Tupi, South Cotabato(CTA Case No. EB 1459)
- COUNTRY BANK, RURAL BANK OF BONGABONG, INC. v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2760)
- WIPRO PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10329)
- MITSUBA PHILS. TECHNICAL CENTER CORP., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9297)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CEBU HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 478)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES PTE LTD.,(CTA Case No. EB 1742)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.