CTA Case No. 2796 (Decision)
f\EPU Bt,fC 0~ TT..HAEX PBAJPLPIEPAPlLNS~ QfllJ RT O CITY QUEZON -- �1 - ... - -- - .�.. 399
- � � �� - � 400
�7 - i i , � , , 40 1
�1 � i , 4. 0 2
� 27 - 5- i. g tc i.,. ro ly cl r r .. 1 i1 f s t , r ~. i . ti.o , (1) h t o- r is n i 0 h jc i 2 1 Cl 1 1 ( 3) th i i �t le t nc 0 0t 1 () i 1 l 0 0 f y h ~;t 1 t s n th ur n n � V' h i ct 10 h i nd � ar <01 t f fr q v 1 j n , �� c. s . 0 n � 73. ) 29, id ic , y r t � ci c � � a t 0 ct, 40 3
� .. � � � � �� 404
- 7 r -1 - � , � 1 � � � c - 7. 40 5
i7 - � . �� � � � 7� �� � .. � 27 . 1 � 7'1; � �� � � � , � in i 406
h � � �. � � i � c 407
7 . C� t � ) '1 ' ; � � .) t ,. � 408
� -- r � II c .) � y ... � �� � � .... ? c. ; ,n �0 .. � '� l � v� 0 II r l II n ci �. .. 0 0 � , 40 9_.
�7 -2 � r� v a lt i nI �� � � y, � 7� J 410
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.