CTA Case No. 568 (Decision)

IC 01" "I' Of tAX - � � 1� () i � n- il � 11 $ � n 0 - 0 y y t 0 - li c o. � �� 1 I � �1 � , 12 � � c - fo 242

� - 2- �

c. �

J) ii of tio. 1f r 1 1, nt 0 �� th t th y 0 11 0 . tt f 5 f 1 c th th 0 1 - he d i I 245

� .. � i n XS I � nt iv r iO � t of p titi n of t 1 h of t h f r �o o ini n 2 4 1. h a l- y pr o r ct o .. 2 0 t v ue � pc 0 . 124.. � i i nr 1h s 0 i i in y �1 nhh h f f 0 ly s �1 � y t0 of h 1 h of v to id c tX r~a � c~ti � i 51 v nu Co an oll cto of Int. � � r1 T c i ipin G. � v. � L- ly � 9 n C 11 ct 0 n � v./ J 1 � <)I � � � ov. 1 19 � Xs~ c i n l n t oc r�n 1 hc f "ti c er l de 1 poin " Th p i- c i 1 ~2 h t it i f 246

247

DI .. 6 �� - 7 .. cl i c ft r 1 en no c 0 eli v th t th c ~ � h � v- 1 c 11- 1 s t hi yh in ou il h cu of hi li h m co t t in v in t � c ncl l. n Qr iv itio n of Th t c h on 5 i i in h �) 1 ti J, of at th ... t tn l.flC tX y 15. 9 n nnt- i t ....1..- c t c \.II p ly 0 t i c s n d �y . ) inc ici cy nc X t )1 t0 yi y i l ti tt i fiv &f � 248

� - on t n ri 10. 19 � J 1 1 cti in t t tI n1 1 c 7 0 c 11 t f1 fol- 1 tt nP i u � -- n 249

o. ~ 1 ( � � ) 1 <: 1 c i h u i il y x- i , � ( � !' n � 3 ly 19 1. ss 11 i l 0 f h t t lli t i� f ct n is 0 f i 1t t ( rtu li n not 1 J� 2 50

� the basis � � � � 251

� f c ... - � � ' � 252

253

� 56 � 1 to -l zr n t nly 'nc c 1c t lp p t� i n r n hi � tition cl . � hie h � h n ft t d th t i nt t nt n frt i t off i l t 11 n- t t f c 4 i � tl 0 i :rd th id :rin i- ti s fi . l , eta it ci i ... f . 00 op tu a } n the ~ i f i 1 cti l h) 0 th d � '.I ti i n r f 11 d to p t ita l � t t nt c y. c n t y � i l co � c .rc - li it in pi . t i l� of 1 rop d c i r p ii 'a n � th 1 ity f t - 1 t1 1t fu of c h i cd th th G v ry c ully a ni h y fil d 8 r urn f pp f v d- i ic � 11 I~ & rc r yt in c nduc d th v t 254

1 1 255

� 56 -. f : .; f'T'l-# -1 . 74 l, 25 . 9 1. r 25 6