CTA Case No. 20313 (Decision)

ftM�Ul:U..IC OF' THE l'tilLIPPtNEJ COUHT OF TAX APPEAL' MAN II""" .ILIP It cw � . � la ntlf � 1VIL 13 . X� � � n � � ~ - � � � � � � -~ �

Il.A � 31 � 2 .. o ptlon fr � !nc . ta the unta r�- .,.. 111pplne Cha~ity � ved by fr t �t�k�� ff ee unde t n ttt. a l In arnal v n C ned. d a o epubllc et r � c��� � r :tnd pending in \ � C t o 1r t In~t nee f anila up n the � lis nt of \hi ty 1e o. t� J � i t �� t.hi c t tion 22 f hat plaintiff has f ctf.o dld n t x uat 11 1n tr � .tve .,...,"~ 1 ,. fen- t rite. t. to th ct c at lnst � 19~3. ne � a 1t f In ernal fn Jit n ttl n f ita v '&Y in th� t n- �t� �. r tty 0 wto. 2 � 19 � ) c un l f � � l-!) 1. J utll o that no preat the c at � lely th tr la - . ~ 339

l -- t n1 y c1 cl or th of l s c ut t in v� J. 1 0 ty .. 3 4 2 �l �

.t � ly, 1 c� 1 c: et� � �t � 343

.. lA F. 313 �� !ch pr v � or - 7- ..., .r:actn cl .U of n aGe �p la fr tax, 1 13 c; � 79. fr tc it y tn re t. h ~in �uc r 0 0 ��� 1 ;.pal e of � ..oo y e<:ti n �9 h flx ax 2tH) 0 the � � ./ �N t.be op1n1 c t�x the y hf.l l.p- lne hart :y � n al .. n 79 t � i h ():.J yi r llor i � J 1 , i 7. ., ; 3 4 !l