[ G. R. No. 40051. July 17, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40051. July 17, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40051
[ G. R. No. 40051. July 17, 1934 ]
JULIA LUDOVICE, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. JIMENO QUINTO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Sorsogon________, dated the __________16th__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant __________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 178762. June 16, 2010 ](G.R. No. 178762)
- [ G.R. No. 145730. March 19, 2002 ](429 Phil. 208)
- G.R. No. 170475, June 07, 2007
- G.R. No. 224097, February 22, 2023
- [ G.R. No. 20732. September 26, 1924 ](G.R. No. 20732)
- G.R. No. 160890, November 10, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 4480. October 10, 1908 ](G.R. No. 4480)
- [ G. R. No. 39852. May 31, 1934 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.