CTA Case No. 2800 (Decision)
I! � : " 1r O F �1 � r�� r-' l r.!.tr riN&S cou QL:&ZO ' CITY ,� -- � � � i , i ( - -( � � c , , 1 , 7� 22
- �2 - 2- i� f c ur , r1 cri � 1 ric 1 , c' -73 -0 � a � 1 r i r, J i n c: � � i� t � 1 , �1 0 (1) ( >- ! r 0. l c i 23
- 2 � - i t. �i n i c � �i t.G ( .0 - � I ) � 17. � (.) i 1 Convinced. of � ,7 ri 1 N � ) 24
c . r""� -- � �� � 1 r, l 3. � i - :1 h � � , i � 17 � 25 17 l�
-- � , � } � � � � s 26
� � 2v - .... n � n i' t , I 1 - il - I 1 f � i � , � - , , , n .' ' It 27
-7 � � ( ... , i � 1 � � v� � n e c 7 � � 1 �l ' ,� 1 ' �� c c � ( c ( .. � ) � �t 7# � ir:: c -28
� r 29
. ... - u , � ll ,
- � t � i � � �� 31
-- � - ) ri - � 32
�2 �� ic >. i � � c � � 33
� 1. -- � , r 34 .- - - �
- 1u �0 ,. l� c r 'n I � 1� 35
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.