CTA Case No. 682 (Decision)
- �2 � � �� L � "" X � - fc h � i op o t t 1 1 t d 311
---~ - - � - tin h1l!pp or t t � c: rc � n ch 1 � l � 1c t � uke 1 � y � 1 c t In v t t 8 b 1n , 1 0 :1 nt 1 9 7. � ship tp � n r ne I o p 1 an I "n 11 0 � � ' oJ. � 1 i !.nn1 f . � 1 t � u� 0 nt 1 c nt n , 0 1 7. 1 � l fil c il 0 r. p t '"" �� ), h l. r l 1� t 0 of 2, , it t - � t , l 1 u h 0 � � t I � c: 1nt 1 � 'J 1 �) 0 "'"'
-. r tt t X p l 0 � 313
- � .- I np 0- J t0 � 1n n 1 � it c c � � � 1� � t 1n 1 � i � c 1� n c y c. y, ( ), � d �t c 1 � 42) , � t
2 �� 1 � c li 1 � � � �� �315
-- I. c. � 2 .. � h d C1 on hr y rr p 1 1 .1 or 1 t �on c 0t � ttt h ch 11 � 0 .� � 1 n1 � vet r � 1. 0c 11 31
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.