CTA Case No. 2079 (Decision)
'- IC OJ' THE PBILIPPINt. w0LR1 OF TAX APPE.A.Li QUEZON CITY � --�- .. - 19 E .. "" - .. :; 1' a. l. . .ru, ;( "� 0 "" l.tS 2 l/ ;1. os.tn. ' " A\ 1 e.l I l'f � �o~ 1 ra ... ~ t. , \..I.;.;, l 'e!O t.S of t; th .u.v........ 0 n -"t ~ :.- s� c: ""'; ;..; r J
�:r � . � � - -. \ .. �0 i �� � ' �~ 27 9 .I)
I \ � � / � 'r etlo v5 t 280
� \ �o. 2079 -.... lot 1r r e c 1ot a . h 0 e� n (. ) t �h r � e i ' t t ilWJ' � in t. ar Q 1.� d. t' 1t 1 i ... i { ) ll t. h , t ft 'l"O d y t. ~ a 0 Cuo;;j_to s Ot.U:'a tt ot th r�in ;. cov&ti ut t t to t w 1 po'l."litio ot t e e J (4} :th 1o ene ,1lhtb. n eq t 1 u� pl e � ot, er ehi ,. ttl of r ( ) t.h t ll 1 ' e hl h pro )r p ~tr who ' houl 11 b .for t ~ l aion 1 . th own r o t ve � n o t pe 1tic .., wt o 1$ er l th � . l � p t1t1:.uier co t nd t at .~ 1!' t ~ l$�1 . 1- . i-ty of he r ' ' � tt, "OUllt f ,co . uo 1 ole. ai11t fox.' an ex ~n d i � ~ 1on. "or 0 . ' tnl id ue t1oz no l d ir t nh 1:$ .o. 'u too QJ.* Lrip t t1vner ' � . p or :r vi \4 t11 urt . l"l t � r� t -"" t..J e or~wn. N v J:� t ~l - ~ � t ::t:or th . ti f tioD o' t1t1on r; w �1 n error in tt ctlarg prosecuted 1 t u ot c.; S't.O ' � 1n t 1 ca� � or, 00 r r t tit on l" '"' , al i il c r t pl. r iolatiox ., �' 4 281 "..' ':"--,� .... ...._.- ~-...,
-. ... ;; n1 7 c I ct o t pro11J. 1 n o. - ot'-o - � l u ir or .r ll" 2521 pr t rd � ( n ) J. n- c 0. i l 0 �s � w~ ,t:Q 1 J y � t.lon, ol ~ecti lvv m� i r 2~2J. o1� d C� , ,_ . . 1 l (l(! 'uCC .�. v � iQ t c .s.tom .,, ' ,} ' o. l 3' e� !llb .~ .. 27, 9, t U.J:'t idt ..,. .: 1 .. Ol c.. by u well ln u 11 r o~: dent.1G
.. � �c ..-�� .: � . ~~......,4 .V<.: �� -- 6 ... ora 1 .. � r f �~ .1 t 191 ' yr� � ~ J.: . � 1~ .� ' # ' 19/l. ��- 4l 283
4i J."e 1... t ��tth 1n1. l'l):t> t1t1orwr . a
# �47 ... �
� 2. . ... ... 1 r 1p r t 1 u.r u. 0 ! 1 , � s� ( � c t ,.. t ... i rt 1 t o.. l. 1 ~ .... 0 " :~ 2 8 6
.� � -r .:� l .l'� - .) ' ii..Y - ... ~lu lon of titi �� r ... ur wno 1� t. r utol li.&b.i X' �1.-h 1.1 J 1S t lt tu ~h ii ottreau 0 Cu t sr.� 1n tho p:ro<:Qed1n . . nt � ~ ' ~.. �ut, M� not v C.~o. .~ "'"5 ~ ill r 1 J o .r el.,,<:t "Q J..1ay .h fl.ll() , in �hioh e , h 0(, t a 1 ' (;t un r eoti .r 25 ') Q t rl.t' ' llo4 � ..;. u �.tly , ount -o.'f.' the t ln ot:� c � < .tl� <U.C ~1v t t.bis (;Q rt han. n rcl1nat.i .r.t t l'~u.UC hs � rr n r. e or � tion tr .m d � s: tt..i ea.. nu !10 Ju� sti. ... ty � ,, th .J. t �C� :.:~.r if "' l nct;1c,e G t.he t'u�t th::tt .l..ll nl ' tt) ' by .... h d ci iu of ra � or � " .it Co � is- Si. !1 ., ,� '2 8 7
More in CTA Decisions
- TEKNOLOGIX INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10803)
- MERIDIEN EAST REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9130)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1254)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GS MTE GRAINS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1958)
- PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7130)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ABB, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1501)
- KEPCO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. THE CITY OF MAKATI(CTA Case No. AC-23)
- FUJITEC, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10965)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.