CTA Case No. 2079 (Decision)
'- IC OJ' THE PBILIPPINt. w0LR1 OF TAX APPE.A.Li QUEZON CITY � --�- .. - 19 E .. "" - .. :; 1' a. l. . .ru, ;( "� 0 "" l.tS 2 l/ ;1. os.tn. ' " A\ 1 e.l I l'f � �o~ 1 ra ... ~ t. , \..I.;.;, l 'e!O t.S of t; th .u.v........ 0 n -"t ~ :.- s� c: ""'; ;..; r J
�:r � . � � - -. \ .. �0 i �� � ' �~ 27 9 .I)
I \ � � / � 'r etlo v5 t 280
� \ �o. 2079 -.... lot 1r r e c 1ot a . h 0 e� n (. ) t �h r � e i ' t t ilWJ' � in t. ar Q 1.� d. t' 1t 1 i ... i { ) ll t. h , t ft 'l"O d y t. ~ a 0 Cuo;;j_to s Ot.U:'a tt ot th r�in ;. cov&ti ut t t to t w 1 po'l."litio ot t e e J (4} :th 1o ene ,1lhtb. n eq t 1 u� pl e � ot, er ehi ,. ttl of r ( ) t.h t ll 1 ' e hl h pro )r p ~tr who ' houl 11 b .for t ~ l aion 1 . th own r o t ve � n o t pe 1tic .., wt o 1$ er l th � . l � p t1t1:.uier co t nd t at .~ 1!' t ~ l$�1 . 1- . i-ty of he r ' ' � tt, "OUllt f ,co . uo 1 ole. ai11t fox.' an ex ~n d i � ~ 1on. "or 0 . ' tnl id ue t1oz no l d ir t nh 1:$ .o. 'u too QJ.* Lrip t t1vner ' � . p or :r vi \4 t11 urt . l"l t � r� t -"" t..J e or~wn. N v J:� t ~l - ~ � t ::t:or th . ti f tioD o' t1t1on r; w �1 n error in tt ctlarg prosecuted 1 t u ot c.; S't.O ' � 1n t 1 ca� � or, 00 r r t tit on l" '"' , al i il c r t pl. r iolatiox ., �' 4 281 "..' ':"--,� .... ...._.- ~-...,
-. ... ;; n1 7 c I ct o t pro11J. 1 n o. - ot'-o - � l u ir or .r ll" 2521 pr t rd � ( n ) J. n- c 0. i l 0 �s � w~ ,t:Q 1 J y � t.lon, ol ~ecti lvv m� i r 2~2J. o1� d C� , ,_ . . 1 l (l(! 'uCC .�. v � iQ t c .s.tom .,, ' ,} ' o. l 3' e� !llb .~ .. 27, 9, t U.J:'t idt ..,. .: 1 .. Ol c.. by u well ln u 11 r o~: dent.1G
.. � �c ..-�� .: � . ~~......,4 .V<.: �� -- 6 ... ora 1 .. � r f �~ .1 t 191 ' yr� � ~ J.: . � 1~ .� ' # ' 19/l. ��- 4l 283
4i J."e 1... t ��tth 1n1. l'l):t> t1t1orwr . a
# �47 ... �
� 2. . ... ... 1 r 1p r t 1 u.r u. 0 ! 1 , � s� ( � c t ,.. t ... i rt 1 t o.. l. 1 ~ .... 0 " :~ 2 8 6
.� � -r .:� l .l'� - .) ' ii..Y - ... ~lu lon of titi �� r ... ur wno 1� t. r utol li.&b.i X' �1.-h 1.1 J 1S t lt tu ~h ii ottreau 0 Cu t sr.� 1n tho p:ro<:Qed1n . . nt � ~ ' ~.. �ut, M� not v C.~o. .~ "'"5 ~ ill r 1 J o .r el.,,<:t "Q J..1ay .h fl.ll() , in �hioh e , h 0(, t a 1 ' (;t un r eoti .r 25 ') Q t rl.t' ' llo4 � ..;. u �.tly , ount -o.'f.' the t ln ot:� c � < .tl� <U.C ~1v t t.bis (;Q rt han. n rcl1nat.i .r.t t l'~u.UC hs � rr n r. e or � tion tr .m d � s: tt..i ea.. nu !10 Ju� sti. ... ty � ,, th .J. t �C� :.:~.r if "' l nct;1c,e G t.he t'u�t th::tt .l..ll nl ' tt) ' by .... h d ci iu of ra � or � " .it Co � is- Si. !1 ., ,� '2 8 7
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.