cta_decision CTA Case No. 9898 1957-02-18

CTA Case No. 98 (Decision)

ltEPUllLTC OP nm PJUT.IP~ �~ COURr OF 1 \X AP~�ALS IIANll.4 on - v us - - -- -�... )( �� ... .. � :r - .. � � ly 59 :ur u � I

� � 2- con ol1 �� d �� y - - �1 � =.tlt X X � . � lty .'.. 60

- � -. � , - gc �� !., ll.l 6, 61

-- ) 1 � 11.11 la 0 � � p �1� � y. y t � ) c 62

- � -� 14 .., 'I � s.....a � � t f.r 1��-� � � � Ub WoJ portiOn of z �f � t1sta,- � � 1��- 0 .. �blil -Nil~ actvuly lo�t t. ' (d) �f ~he Ht o- 1V~fqiii;'W . . ef ,.ty Uecle et �m..�� 1 ... f tr�� or otbe ca�\Utlty. J Ia ._.....,. the � IU. lo�� ca al.ty 1 �� a 63

� � 1 t� r v� .. { � a et or- 1 � .. ny p t1 l ,� 64

� - 7- c � l� 65

u � J%1 ... J' y -- .., ceo n - r or ... a 1 ont :i.rh. ) r .. f nn t- 1r in 'I � ol ,,. f# 66

- - n l l.. ] 0 t ��� re- � ' 1 � y � y �' G7

� ... .. _ns e nt " � � � 0 0 st l 1 � . {)

.� - 11 - ~ ~ ly t .t bl ~ ..,... tl-..... �al � � swlh " f � all to � pet t l ... .� � �1M �� as CUe elnaCly 41� , �� � �� � t 7 of the � � 69 �c 1n ec- 11

- - 1 ... I) ca r.nt

� -1 �� - � � � ,. vI r � � � 2. , ~ly � 11 tot-. � � ly � �� -� � � � �� 0 � � 71

- 14 - 0 ~~:.�...~nal � . , � � � _. 1411, � � �1 ..�... p f � of �� not ltr A � ...., .r t �� t o�� �� (c ) . 72

� - tle, ....�

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.