CTA Case No. 2710 (Decision)

f? � "'P.t.-.E8 , . ;ALB J.IY ... vr: u. � 1. it un r 11 d nt juri~!,.. t1oo ' v- fifltiti n f r ,..r .�'J 17, ie o�r h \) �lt. red 'thll4t t.h.~ e,-1 irt.al p~;'i.t1ti... n to t1 .on Ol" th~ 3 .,.,.., . ; ,4� 1"'\t� P' c "' . 1 � 1 ' u.:r '

�7 -- � f 0 1.1 0 "1 ... 9. ? ' t � , t t. t .. 95

-t ' 1 t� h- r ste t ot 1c iL. _.".' t )t X' - I t' t i ,;�t,Olt.Jt: t" ' t:l t . cf 7' nt ny p~t1 - 7t..1 t un e:r 9(, .19 t ttL 11 ,t. 1 96

� -- � 1 n 1 .. ... f l, 7 � 97

�7 -- .. l - � � u � - ,7 ' . 98

( 1? ' . l t 'h �- . . .' ~ ' � ' 99

-- � 7 t ' 00

�0 , - h , ' � ... 10 1

D '. l.!l'�ltiN ~ '~ .r " .� c~ :f. �.,� 2110 # t i he 102

,' 0- � � � '� 103

- � 71 -' ( .., .' � t � 1 f I. t �

.. � -1 ' '( ,. /} . ~. ' ~- 7 105