CTA Case No. 522 (Decision)
C Ok"' 1'1.. �.-HlLIPP'~ OF '1 ..... ' A.P.P~ J.UN1)..4 �{J.d. . �� r. ... r: ' 6 1 .. - .... .... .... ... . .. l .. ... .! .... t 1,� - 361
-i r ... . c� � 362 -
-- - 363
-- ... 365
� .... .. � 366
... r .... t 367
- "" r L � 368 _j
th . � ll, .... t tt ii � .t :1. ~ :!tl b t: i~ �r i,;!J( �(.,.vd .] :hl h du uot eonl&titut~ l~- t) oi - ~� � Cf:l t �f c fit o� '.1 �Lt!l~u~ .. ... t .. (If ~IIJ: f'or �n"t 369
r - I I ~ I t ... I f� 370
11 �rw. .;; _t'Q;r ft" r tv in ' '1.� �<itt. t i \o'l'~'i "'.r iaJ. J 1t '� ... �~ �- . ; :~, ��� lo ,;;; .. J, � �- . 371
.... l2 - pr s rr , t t) TX tin '"'~ � � tas. ( ��' j ln r�Ener~ 1.- ���1 _ tt�. � p~ t'tnt~b) tifilx :$ n t p�ti~ Wit!''<11l thf.IJ tl,;.,. �.. rSo~:rt .j' th .. lt th1f:11 t tvien'tv-f!ve ~ "' tt.tu~t� 'li (� � � t 0 t~ t X L..;.;-:.:;,. Th~ ~:.ou.,~ In tnt.,r~r~~>tirK '!)ru:t ':.Jrtstr4ttn t1J ~.h.#IJV~>::VtfiiOO S:"'idt 'In 'tt! in t:if!C c � ll�~c .. i .v.n vf :;;t,,tt .>i!lt', to be :aan. t~' on th hn& no 11-e~ t tor! t.~ th.� 1~� t t r ~ t: ' .. p-J~.tl~".t vf' th .Ph:'L!:t':f!' � t _n... zy ttri l Corr � � m.t. ~o . lt):'f7 .. ) �X JC: X !hi.S pro� 1'lli r� ;L$ { .(.L �to 'f� l t ca;;ntt!.t"" '1,..; i e.c.lt,..l) th�, Coll~~cfvl:' ' of l'""l. rn� 1 ht}V( �1u\"" Ti a" fi te ::.tl . ��"., 3 ') ~~ I ""'
.$ l a� fo or 0 r. 1 n' � t � ~ld not 0! f v 1 ::.. to 3 9 !"; v'
1 374
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 37 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 37)
- METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6923)
- CITY GOVERNMENT OF QUEZON CITY, as represented by Mr. Edgar T. Villanueva, in his capacity as City Treasurer of Quezon City v. NATIONAL GRID CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES(CTA Case No. AC-351)
- CE PHILIPPINES LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 730)
- CTA Case No. 3374 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3374)
- PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9663)
- CTA Case No. 5533 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5533)
- ST. TIMOTHY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, ST. MATTHEW GEN. CONTRACTOR & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ALPHA & OMEGA CONTRACTOR & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ST. GERRARD CONSTRUCTION GEN. CONTRACTOR & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, and PACIFICO F. DISCAYA II, v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10472)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.