CTA Case No. 1634 (Decision)
- - - � - .~ - - 1 � 1, ) � �� �' 1 1�1 � �' 28
���� �� �\' I �. -'" i ,. r":< "' 7 \ � ;, 2 9
'"�. "L 16J ' ..�-- t '-"'+ t .~ '' f� ,. "II 30
.' I .! . -' ' tt �1 1 t1 :� 31
1' '. :--~ '� i� p~ 'l ....Jr :J.' ,..-\ ' ~ �j '. . ,. ., ' 1 '. ... ' 1-:< � ': 'C:- ~. � 'j ., ' t' ... \ 32
' ,r ' '' I 0 l'O a ( '- 1'1 ... ' b t th o t x la ~ � � �� 1b lA s �t ' .. ,. Philip 1 ot tbe t � t Jt 33
, 'L .' . 7 , , ot . .I - (l)tttl' 0 �' '" in -ot e In �� of n .n., '� rrt.�l' �
I � �.\ -I � �- Jf' � ,. J - . .' ' ;,. io;\ , I .' . ltd ctn t--t� r crt 1 �� t1cke -� � I t, , L t~ ttl !ITOIU!U~> ' , PAt ( -Xh. I, t. &, ~MWIJ. !4 ell - eta _t~d ,.,.. ror 1A:L1 PAl. fil~� th o ca.r ie1'� � u the eota. p r _nt - -tu n an � r41Y t It lso tuul4l�� 1n$l:Pa11 fo JA �- s its tion, SiAL r _cei e tba po;pttoa r~apo tUng t h tal' on lc car.rt � on PAL p , a11 rri41 _ . � o ot on � 1 & .. ' ' ualll Ut � � '7 .J L pl ne�� � t � he � t - l L l � lt - !A l a _ott 1 tt#an1 � o !nat � he lea ot t ti ~eta aod car ftAf'!Aa 1 4 tb,S � ntrt; to a4a1n1str t1ve � ct1 b.&- 1 o 4 tb lA tuture np r- ttone~: 'l I. '
.. � lL a ot' � ( ( � n .PlUS r -a- L :L � i �, � 1 .. � ga1 tt y PA � � :� 36
-I .. '1 � l.:1e 37
.' ' ..' . :.. .,. .. -, . 'l 0 < ' �I � �� . ,,.' ~ '- ' ,. ~ 1 ( .. �� tY �' / � 1 pa�eGDltOl'$ t 1 38
'. '' ' 1 / 12 t 11 1 � ACh 1 ?. ot t 11 88 � 1 rfl.c t t.-tr I t �� 1. \ d ' n 1 e. � s t ) ' ' (J lY o. � ' 10 ..w. ,. 9; 1 �� ,.,.., .,�� 1 !itm. .1 ) . � �� t Q � ta ia ~' �� 39
'I ..� {~� I : lf -'!\ _., '!"\ ' I flo. I,�' r'" �� - t '1 ' ~�~.~~i r� ,~ ""-~ .< '11' 1 ~ � ~ r "'il'l'! .' I j.� ,; i~ ~_f !ta ~---.1 ct a � ~I � �� 1 t�r ',. ) t � '~ ' '\>< n' a �� �1 l t .... �1 r '' : !'I 40
, 1~ ;' ' ' ,. 1 l ' ' 1 �� .' , ' 1 ke e.rt. � ,. 41
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.