CTA Case No. 1693 (Decision)
~EPUBU:� 011' THE PHILIPPIN~ COUR'I' OF TAX APPE'A.L& ~EZON 011,. � r ' � - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ r- ?, '' ' l d 1 0 2 5 0...
(a) 1 () � ls; (. } ; ( ) nt . t c '(f1) 61. :i lends; () f)
{l ' Cl . H O~' - C~ CAS �. '!tJ., 1693 3 J.... 9. 2..., < 1 . t 7 � �S'l!. ���� . . . . . . . �� � � � � �� 1, .9 .~� 3 ��� �.c n .t g . . . . . . . urn 0 k- � � t� .. ����� ��� ��� � � � � � � � � � � � � � ������ � � � � � � � ; 7,397 - 1 ~.: � a dit � n- 282
.� 1 -9�.l. r ����� . . . . � � � � � � � � � .. . .. .. ... .... ... ... � � � ~ 253
-'. . . . . . . . � � �c �j � . . , .. ..... . . . ,. . � .. �� � � � l r J3 . � .. �,1 9 '1 .0. 6 . � " � . . � � � � "' l. �� � �� �1 ,1 � � .. � � d ot 0 t .:.r � � .. � � ,�.. � ... � .� � �� .. 5~ .. . � 0
6 1;
u ,.ctll m ... C 7.. CA:,g 0.. 169 ? tion of' ts p o iv On t ntat1o "'* r u u.II .... . s.,.~.on c s �ft t .._, ., R-r.hiblt � (t.rtiol-..s o! I - ol cor �at1 of an Jua d 1o t ! . tlo,.,.ine '* ~ ro~, to wit. 1� " e o he � t'or 1 a fo . a1 oo t - th o p ition r r tn .. o th r .sp "!. lh h .r. or not p � tl t1o'l~r 1 s liable f )f' r ~ s1 1li: t m: - nalty ro 1-e .. 'a l t .~r f')f n tbr. otal t~.n (}f ' 4-C . 00 or ...... 195i! to 1955'� 'ln I' fl n ~- putn h t .~1 tot�. �� in bt)th t :c hl � an nnn-tax15 ~1 n v.ratton � 'lbe in �O � e.r .v choo . r ex t f incl'l tax I �.1 . fl hfll f rro~ i t pron r if'IS ~nd :!~v - � In th. 0 "'' ~ t t 19S"' of ts t ab'\ 1.n 0 .r t �L 1. .r 1 52 n ti 01 Jlfl d i l l s -1xa 1 .
. DP.C!oiCm - C . CA::.,.�J 1H . 16~� 3 0 ..,h in t llo i c t.r~ t i ' ,. n nde t d l l o , hQ ver, h ion of oo r. d:i~ 4�Ul~! om sh r�1n � in t lloc - n t _r tiv . X n t r ou d t h n the istr t io 0 na r� 1 1- lo ble b si.. Xn t: ey not inou red 1n 'c rryin� on cy tr or bu 1 ithin t la �1ol'l of S ction C( J 1) 0 1t1on r tor h qu tion. 'rh prov a.ion of h R n Co d a11n on �d d etib 11 ty ,r o 1n of r � s r l nt. to t 1 ti r, pro 1 follo t o. (l ,. l tt t� t, wo 1 lU� 0 p'; iz t .r r -l.r 00 pr d nt t t1 c 1 wi llo d ror �d bu in � !rt 57
169,3 ut (2) " rdi ary en ~ n c s.~ ~ y rr, U i th 't xabl 1' , t� u .o�. t � or 11 . ~:tal Inc A'U' � 25'. t>, 19 2 fr \ ill / cJ\d.t d y b for ' ng r a 11' ."ent . bold hat p t!.ti. M�l" ail 0 sta lJ.Sh by co�~1l t ro ttl'< l rec~ipt 0 . i nt. re a:ld div1d~. q1 c jit t eo th cerryin n of ;rt ad~ or busi� 0 a .o a:r _n th d duct,. 11ty of t:h t�tioncr ,_., � how sold an � r :u.t ~ s te! i s ~cnr1t fl..S, how ! m-ad .oi 1. . Gt nd lh�ir'ther it on ultAd br k~ s, 111� Vf!\', t C"l")t ot- �t. tis� cnl s -::rvlet"'s . i!e!t :r :t sl r.Pin t n , f.l.t.M.t of :its ot:ivit1. . 1 r� rtiei '-'ti .n , 1f' ~�ny , dl o or in' i ot, i 0 r pore tio!l;.; ~here it ..ad . .o ~ . n ffeet, ther- 1 0l ,u� any ind o.... ion of' a bu~ n(!Jss-llk- ! '.. oe. ""1 ... J.J ,..._ .n s . .. ", e\_ .,tt;:.. , 37 1. � is to ht n l t. in- V(�$t lt 'f)-Or f .. 0 r i.tr b y , .t haS i.th �t" to nG ~ the r i �s of � n 1n tm t b ri er nr 268
� 16 3 ~. 1 (' 1 1.! r t () w. 1 t ily 1n t dy t c f. t nt ,. � ol.l or cl r c l h lp, d c 1- ' ':. _ t 1 ly qu rod et ~11 err �. .ti y on � r tl t r. 0 0 fioi l 1 p it t il d d a n n.:r .1 n � .s d 1. bl nu ai h s u 269
n� c� ticm 1 co .tit on end,, tt... .... 1 m�nt a 0t 1 r 1 i ~ t r 260
- 16 3 1 .. � n �1"' 1 .. 0 ir e 1 1 �� tt �� . r on � t 1 0 iJ r 1 h1
�1 1 � l .y 1 �) , � � � ) .) � � ' 1 7, f 282
. .... '" 1 14 ' 1. 1 T � . c (} t. � � t -� fr 1 1 1,6 . 'J th 1 � t r 1, ' �1 10 0 1957, 0' h r If 1 ' 16 1 ( ' 19::/'" 1 ~ .... . ... � � � c 263
More in CTA Decisions
- CITIAIRE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2511)
- NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION (NPC) v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK (PNB) and MUNICIPALITY OF SUAL, PANGASINAN(CTA Case No. EB 1104)
- RCBC LEASING & FINANCE CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10786)
- CTA Case No. 5144 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5144)
- CTA Case No. 835 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 835)
- CROMA MEDIC, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2213)
- MARILY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9756)
- CTA Case No. 638 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 638)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.