CTA Case No. 1566 (Decision)
Ay
EPUNUICOZTHE NTILIPTINE COURTOF APEA QOEZON CITY
GUIBDS WEAR PACTORY Petitioner. Dm
Versus CTA CASE NO. 1566
CONISBIOH GF CUSTOMS Respondent.
E
DECIGION
This ia an appeal fron the decision of re-
spondent deted October 23, 196, in Cuatoms Case
No.470 Seizure Identification No.1490, affirm
ing that of the Aeting Collector pf Custons for
the Port of Manila decreeing the forfeiture in
favor of the Government of twenty 20) cases of
"rayon tulle in the piece" snd ordering peti-
tioner and its surety to pay, jointly and sever-
ally, in cash the nmount of F26,672.19, repre-
senting the appraised value of the seised merehan-
dise, for violation of Central Bank Cireulars Noa. 44 and 45, in relation to Section 1363f of the
Revised Administrative Code. This case was sub-
mitted for decision on the basis of the recore
after the testimony of one witness for the petitioner.
The undiaputed faets ahow that the merchandise
in question arrived in the Port of Manila from
New ork on Mereh 31, 1954 on hosrd S/s Gleen
14 4
CTA CASO156 DECISIGN-
2
ville, under Registry No.411, aceompanied by the corresponding hipping docnments Exhibitg Bill of Ladingxhbit gCommercial Invoice and Exhibit R, Consular Invoicepp.81,70,
7l, Customs Recora). Upon examination, the importation was found to conelst ef yayon tulle"
for which feancn it was weized and subsequently
deelared forfetted for violation of Central Rank
Circulars Nos+and 45,in relation to #ec
1363() cf the Revised Administrative Code. H
ever, it was feleased to petitioner upon the fillng
of a suroty bond in the sum of 26672.19 in favo of the Repnblic of the Philippines see P. 82 Customs record). The release certificate issued by the Central Bank Exh.c P.69,Cuatoms recora) calls for 20 cases pecial Textiles Fabrics Code No.650326, Coumodity Classification App.C YeP
The only issue to be resolved is vhether or
not the importation in question is subjeet to for-
feitare for violation of Central lonk Circulars o4 ana 45n relation to ection 363f o
the Revised Administretive Codes
Heapondent contends that the perchandise in question is a royon tulle in the piecefalling nder Comodity Code No.650407-C, and not
"Spocial Textile Fabrics with Commodity Code Ho
145
CTA1566 DRCISIOH
3 650326-P, which 3s the Iind of article authorized
in the Releese Certificate issued by the Central Bank (Rxh."Ca). Accordingly, it is argued that
the importation violated Central Bank Cireulars
Nos T d +5.
Petitioner maintains the contrsry view.
is eontended that when it applied for the corres-
ponding letter of credit for the importation of
the merchandise in quertion, a sample of which was
presented (Exhibit ", the proposed importation
as classified as Special Textile Fabrics" under
Comodity Code o.650326-NBP, implying that even
assuming that it was imported under a wrone
classification, the error is net due to it bat to the Central Bank which authorized the importation. Moreover, it is srgned further, that doth "Special Textile abrics Synthetie, n.e.s,under Commodity Code #o. 650326-MRP, and rayon tulle, under Com- modity Code lo. 650+07-E0, are listed in the Cen- tral Bank s Commodity Code Jook and are allowed to be imported. And heving neid all the taxes and euatons chargem on the importationg the Qovernnent did not suffer any ioss in revemue
Respondent's contention is well taken I
appeers in the record that the importation in question ie rayon tulle. It properly falls under the ategory and code number 8, 650407. The term wE following the comodity description
146
DCIBIO CA CAR NO 1566
4
"Special textile fahries" meons not elsewhere
specified in the Statistical Classifieation of
Commodities. If the merchandise clearly falls
under a different olassiflcation, its importation
cannot be Justified under the classification peaiml textile fabrics,S,650326-P. And
since the imported rayon tulle in qunstion falls under the different ciassification Tulle, reyon, 65007-NEc", it is not emhraced within the classi-
fieation of uspecisl textile fabrics, MS, 650326-
Nem, specifimd in the Release Certiricate issued
by the Central Dant.
This conciusion finds support in the ietter
of the Deputy Governor of the Central Bank deted
June 9, 1955, the existence of which is admitted
by petitioner, which rends in part as follows
under Code iNo.ec-6504+07 -Tuile Office is reyon tuile, end this item is specifically listed in the gtatis rayon. ticai Clasnification of Commoditiem "The commodity submitted to this
Morecver, it aannot be correctiy implied by
petitioner that the Central Bank officials misled
it in making the impovtation under the vrong
statistical classifieation for it is expressly
admitted bpat it applied to the Central Bank, thru its agent bnnk, for the importation of the goods in question under Commodity Code No 650326-P Special Textile Fabrics Synthetie, n.e.s.par.2
147
DRCISION CEACASE .1566
5
P1Petitioner's Memorandum p+3C.A
recora).
Petitiener's allegetion that it brought a
sample of the herehandise to the Centrsl lank when
it apylied fcr the importntion in question is net
substantiated by the evidenee.
The imrortatien not heving been covered by e
releasr certifieate isaued by the Centrel Bank, it is subject to forfelture for violation of Central ank Ciroular Wo4 ana 5 relation t
Section 1363(f) of the Revised Administrative Code.
Pindtng no error dn the decision appealed
from, the same is hereby affirmed, with aonts
against petitioner.
SO ORDERED
Quezon CityApril 261967
Presiatng Rom . grNnL Judge T COSCUR
SENNISIAO R.ALVAREZ Aseociate Jndge a(N UxaL
Agrociate Judge RAMOm L AVANcA aid not take ert
148
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.