CTA Case No. 1996 (Decision)
. 'C 0 TH PH!LlPP, :-JES Oulltt '\:.!'PEALS QL~zo~ C.ITY �� � � - � �1 ��� l . . . . . . . . . . . . .-r . . . . . . . . . . . . _~ 0 .1 t� ( ) (l) � �� .. 261
� - 1 11 � �� 262
- � -- - . �v. � 7 �� ( ) (1) 1 1 1 1 �� ( ()1 263
... �1 -- 16l �� � � () .) r ( () � 264
�1 - i 1 ti 1� ( J. � il � � � .1 1 265
... � - .. ( l � c .( � � � � �� 266
n�e1 �to eTA c .. 1 i J' Pl� � o� h .......,............ } � Aa st.a 11 - a al 2~ ( ) (1) - dor:tj l pi 1- .t . w bout ll� 1 1 11 ble 0 r eni ! � 2 6.7
c -� 1 i �f r - t1 1 � il'leC).l'l'Wit 1 � t a 1 � - 268 c
- � -- � () ., ) � ( () 1 .) � 1 1 1 j J.nc:onJe� 269
0 . lSid � C1\il CA."'S 50. l t 6 - 10 ... pr n 0 :io ...,. . { ) (2) 1( ) of t � 88 1 �ectio l l 0 - 1 o . 2. in tr� n l? s� - r .. � 1 ... y - "' .tt th. lip. 31 ) in tle he (;)1' t p n t� .rt; 'I ..t t; F � �n . ay ir -.t . <; p- t .... !.! 1 JC! d ti t ti t;,. .".."' c d 1 �. " ~hi lloc t. s "D 1 �.l ~- *� t h c 1 .~~... . ay b. -l� by � .C 1 .~p or r scri h ea. .n of Er m ..:iOUt'Ctt$ er i - it 1 it. ut ;h lin i � 1 i a �� ip 0 or 1 l, uch
� - 11 - f 1 ina � 11 pi 1� � l1 �� 1� fJ � � 1 1 i - i � � r 1 271
--. -- 1 � . 1 � � i . � ( r � 1 1�
- c. 1 96 - 13- � � 1 1 r el 11 273
- - 14 .... h11i p p -rt � l t 1 1 . B. i 1 .t. . t:~- P' U1p 1 _ and ' 1 ~-
- � - l ... ili 1 0 rv ce hi il n 4( ) . i1 i1 - �� r � 1 1l � 1 i 1 n 27 5 - 0 1 � r
-� .... l - 1 .� i ) � � ( (2) i l vi 1 � 1 1- � ,, 276
� - 11 - -Co i �l r 1 li 1 \ 1 �- ,, 277
- o~c1~1o:. .A.::::tE -. ,. 19 � ye 3 1 �� �\l 11 t. � fr r ,.. t� !Iff . t - "......... �4' .o� � t a ..,-1--"1~ . e itte re r� e h sure 72 � 1 ....... (lo ec t r t it:i at y 19 4 ~ly n � t 2 lr d 1i � . n 1 r ...~ �1t. oner r eiv.e i.s eas~ ~-� . Q th 1 r tu 5 rep r d n~ f iled by r f-o 1 h lf f tit 0 rs lit �' ct 0 9f h � ..:::o~. to 1 !;,') 11 ul ql r t: rn i1 ti e p es .t' bG by Co .... 1 io of l .5e t.1 72 f e co � a l � d t or thi! t .!1( to .h d 1e1. t.~x a urc er 50% of he nt of sue t; X () � 'iCi y t 278
- �1 - 1 1 � 1 i1 � y ia ,. '9 ~ 9 ,.,
II � r cn i� o- v 1 � n � � � 1. � 1 � 1 h c j ti i 1 0 � c 1 r 1 r r 0 t 1- 1 nn 280
� -2 'l r n t I � v � i � � 1 1 t n � n i � t. 1� 1 u 0 lur o r i' 281 �
... �1 - - 2 on �eli t ~ r nt / 0tt y " �r un r n 0 l i ti n to f'l r t rn. ... rc~ or ls n 1 �h :r cod i0 it th - ific "-'on. he c..i 1 n u t nd . 1 � ine. ti 1 n r s r i bl or fici nc co ta .-o r h y a - 6 in e c tiv n o.c: . 162., � 3 nd 213. 8'79 . 37. or l f 76. o.ao. c m t a I 11 : -19 t i on � � � � � � 82. 8 2. 0 � �� �� � � �� 11 . a s.oo ��� �� ���� 2 � 716 . �s 0 - 16- 67 � � � � � � � � � � �� � � � � � �. �, � � � � � � 7 � � � y n �n - � � � �� �� � � �� � �� �� . . 1 n � � ., ���� �� � � �� ��� � �� . . ., . . . . . . . . �-. on - 67 � � � � � � � � ��� �� � � � � � � . l l o. oo .. � � � � � � 1h com r mi�~ p n lty n tla tot l . f 2, 00 .o ( c for 1 d16 ) u- y e9 ond nt in .i a 0 b 0 d or colle t<! it u th ~ con o y 0 p tition c._. . nd it f'lt) t: e ti n. �CC t �A th i it.ion , f :~ 282
-- �l i �( i1 i 1 n� � � v ; (. l r0 1 no . � � � 0 � -1 27 L 12 v. �15# 1. 1 � : i � � v � Coll �� -1 77 } l � jo l� t 2� r � t ti � 283
- �1 0 � - i� �7 284
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HOYA GLASS DISK PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1473)
- CTA Case No. 2083 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2083)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HONDA CARS MAKATI, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1432)
- BOVIS LEND LEASE PROJECTS PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6825)
- CTA Case No. 2377 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2377)
- CTA Case No. 3113 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3113)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HOYA GLASS DISK PHILIPPINES INC. (Consolidated with CTA EB NO. 1529)(CTA Case No. EB 1524)
- CTA Case No. 1481 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1481)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.