CTA Case No. 1996 (Decision)
. 'C 0 TH PH!LlPP, :-JES Oulltt '\:.!'PEALS QL~zo~ C.ITY �� � � - � �1 ��� l . . . . . . . . . . . . .-r . . . . . . . . . . . . _~ 0 .1 t� ( ) (l) � �� .. 261
� - 1 11 � �� 262
- � -- - . �v. � 7 �� ( ) (1) 1 1 1 1 �� ( ()1 263
... �1 -- 16l �� � � () .) r ( () � 264
�1 - i 1 ti 1� ( J. � il � � � .1 1 265
... � - .. ( l � c .( � � � � �� 266
n�e1 �to eTA c .. 1 i J' Pl� � o� h .......,............ } � Aa st.a 11 - a al 2~ ( ) (1) - dor:tj l pi 1- .t . w bout ll� 1 1 11 ble 0 r eni ! � 2 6.7
c -� 1 i �f r - t1 1 � il'leC).l'l'Wit 1 � t a 1 � - 268 c
- � -- � () ., ) � ( () 1 .) � 1 1 1 j J.nc:onJe� 269
0 . lSid � C1\il CA."'S 50. l t 6 - 10 ... pr n 0 :io ...,. . { ) (2) 1( ) of t � 88 1 �ectio l l 0 - 1 o . 2. in tr� n l? s� - r .. � 1 ... y - "' .tt th. lip. 31 ) in tle he (;)1' t p n t� .rt; 'I ..t t; F � �n . ay ir -.t . <; p- t .... !.! 1 JC! d ti t ti t;,. .".."' c d 1 �. " ~hi lloc t. s "D 1 �.l ~- *� t h c 1 .~~... . ay b. -l� by � .C 1 .~p or r scri h ea. .n of Er m ..:iOUt'Ctt$ er i - it 1 it. ut ;h lin i � 1 i a �� ip 0 or 1 l, uch
� - 11 - f 1 ina � 11 pi 1� � l1 �� 1� fJ � � 1 1 i - i � � r 1 271
--. -- 1 � . 1 � � i . � ( r � 1 1�
- c. 1 96 - 13- � � 1 1 r el 11 273
- - 14 .... h11i p p -rt � l t 1 1 . B. i 1 .t. . t:~- P' U1p 1 _ and ' 1 ~-
- � - l ... ili 1 0 rv ce hi il n 4( ) . i1 i1 - �� r � 1 1l � 1 i 1 n 27 5 - 0 1 � r
-� .... l - 1 .� i ) � � ( (2) i l vi 1 � 1 1- � ,, 276
� - 11 - -Co i �l r 1 li 1 \ 1 �- ,, 277
- o~c1~1o:. .A.::::tE -. ,. 19 � ye 3 1 �� �\l 11 t. � fr r ,.. t� !Iff . t - "......... �4' .o� � t a ..,-1--"1~ . e itte re r� e h sure 72 � 1 ....... (lo ec t r t it:i at y 19 4 ~ly n � t 2 lr d 1i � . n 1 r ...~ �1t. oner r eiv.e i.s eas~ ~-� . Q th 1 r tu 5 rep r d n~ f iled by r f-o 1 h lf f tit 0 rs lit �' ct 0 9f h � ..:::o~. to 1 !;,') 11 ul ql r t: rn i1 ti e p es .t' bG by Co .... 1 io of l .5e t.1 72 f e co � a l � d t or thi! t .!1( to .h d 1e1. t.~x a urc er 50% of he nt of sue t; X () � 'iCi y t 278
- �1 - 1 1 � 1 i1 � y ia ,. '9 ~ 9 ,.,
II � r cn i� o- v 1 � n � � � 1. � 1 � 1 h c j ti i 1 0 � c 1 r 1 r r 0 t 1- 1 nn 280
� -2 'l r n t I � v � i � � 1 1 t n � n i � t. 1� 1 u 0 lur o r i' 281 �
... �1 - - 2 on �eli t ~ r nt / 0tt y " �r un r n 0 l i ti n to f'l r t rn. ... rc~ or ls n 1 �h :r cod i0 it th - ific "-'on. he c..i 1 n u t nd . 1 � ine. ti 1 n r s r i bl or fici nc co ta .-o r h y a - 6 in e c tiv n o.c: . 162., � 3 nd 213. 8'79 . 37. or l f 76. o.ao. c m t a I 11 : -19 t i on � � � � � � 82. 8 2. 0 � �� �� � � �� 11 . a s.oo ��� �� ���� 2 � 716 . �s 0 - 16- 67 � � � � � � � � � � �� � � � � � �. �, � � � � � � 7 � � � y n �n - � � � �� �� � � �� � �� �� . . 1 n � � ., ���� �� � � �� ��� � �� . . ., . . . . . . . . �-. on - 67 � � � � � � � � ��� �� � � � � � � . l l o. oo .. � � � � � � 1h com r mi�~ p n lty n tla tot l . f 2, 00 .o ( c for 1 d16 ) u- y e9 ond nt in .i a 0 b 0 d or colle t<! it u th ~ con o y 0 p tition c._. . nd it f'lt) t: e ti n. �CC t �A th i it.ion , f :~ 282
-- �l i �( i1 i 1 n� � � v ; (. l r0 1 no . � � � 0 � -1 27 L 12 v. �15# 1. 1 � : i � � v � Coll �� -1 77 } l � jo l� t 2� r � t ti � 283
- �1 0 � - i� �7 284
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.