CTA Case No. 102 (Decision)

0 J. ...: � �... :u�� e t1 . r. � 1 1 -.-- - - - tt p ~de t.. - - . .. ..

-' e d. i qu st� pond nt l O.ll f"t 1 '' � '� .� .re rt) ., ~~ n c � ? ,.G � � � � n, i.!e w�

a t l I ... � �� p 1 i' t ... � � 21 � compromise y � .. � t o. n 375

'I lc � :f 37 6

�"" � lU2 � --c > I). � " � .o � �� �� � � ~~l ~ .. � ?d 1' ' t '� 17, l't.,.�l"f. � O�$ �~ c t 0 � 377

�l . ... t. � I ui. t ~�' � � . c ~pt~ ..I< �� I '� . 0 H �� 7. . . . . .��:) .j., , ..,'. ~.., ' � .. v ,. { :t'...l J. \.l\ 0 ', c ... ...,.. Oi - .(: t ' .,� �� � �� � � J } 37 8

�1 /' - 1. 0 , . n t f tb th . t X 1 . :! ~ r I h .ruet1 b� I, n th ~ ct 1 ft p :: t c 1 t � 0 th uJ e 1~1 h ti n t 1� ! ex e axJ ' �t n t $ $ ... th at: 1 ul c e,. 1t e �� nt 0 t X rt � t 2') ecetpt ac � f t are ~ t� .. f n tn � C1 y t cc J $ . f 7. 2.c2. a fi t II' 37} 379

"" ��1- � , -- . ..l. � � ... .� C:f ., ct..�r's p ree.ntag tax,. sure r ~ c ....r n 1 r f df 0r t~:~t :h dt f:tn � . f .r t < c 0'" f1 at "'� ld t ....f. aa ty. ~�:tt. co&t th � ur!tu 1 P 0 380