CTA Case No. 3622 (Resolution)
REPURLIC OF "THE. 14 II '. l-;~ COURT OF TAX Ar'P�A'~~ (liiELON Clr U tL OIL PUll! PINES, t~C., t' tlt..lonor, - voreuo - C.T.A. CASE n. J 22 CO Mt 1 R O' 1 TC HAL [ t u� 'Reap n an � X� � � � � � � � � � � � � � [ .. LUTIO . onflr J.n e or or ivan in open our en , J\JlY 12. 1 t e C Ul' rae ved, Oft � tlon ''� p�tltl ner and without o J� n of l"aaponden , t , . r��l� rant ~� w.l t\drew�l ' p lt Oft t " 1 � � .,., t ov -�n 1 led eae , 1 ��~1 that. he lol� , , � r�fvn4 r erolfit .lnv lved �ln �� �1 ��ely �� �� 1� � � I' ��� t ly, 1 � o� �1 �� ol oed � � l � ad � o. � uea tity, tro M nlla, July 29, l � ...A. / ~'-;. C!l -~-.�...t~ Ul Aaao to � J � lC l
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 2012 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2012)
- DIDDLEY BOW INVESTMENTS HOLDING B.V. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9759)
- YOKOHAMA TIRE SALES PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11590)
- LAPANDAY FOODS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9950)
- CTA Case No. O-21 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. O-21)
- ROLEX CENTRE PHIL. LIMITED (PHILIPPINE BRANCH) v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 11027)
- CTA Case No. 2269 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2269)
- CTA Case No. 2544 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2544)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.