CTA Case No. 3576 (Decision)
- 'i REPU BL IC OF THE P H lL IFr iNE S COURT OF T 1~ X APPE ALS QUE ZON C IT Y AYALA CORPORATI ON, F' e �(� i. t. .i.. ur1 P r�, C.T . A. CAS E NO. 3576 COMMI SSIONER OF INTERNA L REVEN U E , ,.,\ 1 -�� ..- . �.�� � �� ~ D E c; I J[ r..:J I n t h E� p e +�:i.. t i r:' '' ft:1 1'- l 'i"����i.F��! I f i. lr ' d 1.�\l i..Ul l: his eli r-�c-�c: -l.:..i.nr. Int e?. t�� n <J. l F(cv !'.? n u.t:::" tc I'"E' fu.nd (JI'. c:J�-�(:.?cl:i l:. l.�.. u p c�i:. i tiu n l':! r � C o! ... fJu r� i::\ t..i.. C)r l -l.:ht? .; ~ mou r' l:. :. : r 1r:~�.it.: t . c.~ Y c: cmun E~ n:: i. a 1 p .:~ p E~ ,,.. 1:.: r.. '"'� n ;::; c.� c: t:. 5. tJn '"'� , J. t: .i. s i::\ J. 1 ~::~g r'! cl t h "''�t : l, F'F' t .:i. l:. i u r1F~ ,... .i �,:; c:\ c (:> ,.. I'Cl l'��,::, t. i n r1 clu. l y Dl �-~ �':\lli; ~ ro� c l �':> nc! e:~: = .i.�:;;ti.n �:J �.tr��IE�t�� t. h i':! 1 2. \AJ~; uf ' .1..��.::! r:�h:Ll i pp.i. r..,.~<:'i !.\l i t h p� ��:i. rl c: .i p i:~ J 0:::1f f i c re <:: L t h E' 1'1"'' k <;I t.: :i r:~ t: or:: k F :�: c h "" n uF�! Bu i 1 c:l i. n '] , f.) )/,,,, I. a. AVE:" rl u,;:;, ~ 1'1.:::1k "''�t i , t'lf.:! t r��cJ ~�l �=~. n i 1 ,;~ :; 1�-ra�::; p r)n �: IF'n t�. :i. �::: �I 1�1r;;.� cl u. l y ,,, p po :i r1 t F!c! C~:J mrn .;. r:s ~::; i u r1r ~ ,.. ' ' f 111 t . ';~ r� �., .�,l l F\ ,, ,v; :~ � ' 11;:�~ V�l :i. �1.�. !1 :0''..1t:. hur��:.i. ty 1� ,.. ,,�: �1 fen � I ;..lL'~ c:rv,'('�)" i l'llE' n 1.. r 1 1� t:. hc��' F' l ;.i.. l 5.p r'i'H"." <JI �l o:.:l n 1e:'.;, i:J;�., �""�� ' ��.:,, d ' L i.t.ll 295
�, . DE CI SION .... CTA CASE NO. 357S ~iu. rnrne>n!:; <:'.1 '\C.I cd : l'ir.:�J"' r:'("JI..\1' ' 1 Fl ' ' l�:� n ~:; ;� ,:� :.:� .:�!. t h:i. ;:; ryf f i C::C' a. �!:. l� : l 1<~ r:� I �. J�r>i� U C:�f J11 �1 : t :~"' \'~l l'': t~''-/ C1 1 l l.\ C! Ell dq. Gov r.� 1 r HTW I\ l: C�::!n i..t � 1� , �:: .i :t .i. 'l\;: 11 1. O�..tc�;con C i t: y ; 2. Un .:f <�'1. nua1��y ~;~~~:, l ' i' HJ , pc~ t..i t .i.c >n�:::.� r� p .:Li.d to 1 "\?.�~ "; pun r:h :�n i: t. hr:.� ,:�.f' \I.:!U il t . of F' .1. 70, 1.1�06, f:3 ~_:; I"' I:' p t"' E~C:'iF'I'l 1::. i ~"I'J �i:.I�F:� .,,;��. �:, l:.d ;: CJI'l .i.n �l.:p n;~s t: i.rp::: c.� rK~ dr? r- .i. vt:.�t� l f : om c r:~;n rn.:c:1 1.... .:::i. -::\l. P<". p F~1� � t1... D.n �::�' -:.l.r" t:..i.. 01 1�::; i.�n pu�:: c�d 1,(1 1d c�t.. t�.h.;::� '(' ('} l"' fTlE~ t'" S ;:;:c .;�:: t i_ en 2 l 0 ( b ) IYf �l.-.t H:�� r.la L.i Ufl ,:>. 1. In tr�~ r--�n '"' 1. 1'\:r.�! '/lo'll u. P Co d ;:.:~ o �f' 1.. 9 '7 7 , ,;,. �,;:; ame n ded. T h ~ S d :i.d tax was pa i d by ' :it.~"~~ 1 ~ .�-�.-�, P"~' t :.i. t .i. em e ,... (Jtl 1�. h��::! i n t�.t :.�1� T� ~�; �I�. p n:mli !::; "'i n 1'"/ r1 c1'1 u�:::; I.'~), .!::I',�):::JLt L.. . . L.c.c ut:.�� "". c- .......-..�...�.�..�.1..... ..', �r � �. f. '' I. ;.:; 'l" .' I' ' ~ ,._1."_\r. : \'.)'~ � .,��~ o~ "'' )"I P I' �I""("") ' II:':�J�\ . i.. J'I. R ; \, J .i... [') �.'. l'�'t; f) i..�.:.l t. .i I �.�.\1"1 1.. ....1. \ 1 In�:o Ltr� <..;~.nc:: t C �:� rn rl o�\l'l �y ,, Inc . ll!l �;ic: t l \:.; .;>( L'' �! c:lt!:l� � :? t:. I �1 F~ f u r"fll E'I'.. <:;("' c: t .:.:.on l 0 h' a::; .:;,1 1 .J. <.~ 1::.1:.i. 1 :.i. t .'l (J f t . pr:0 t :i.. i O f'\ E' t'" !'.\ ;; ,-,1. !J UI ' I "O v-l f"' I'' ~~ ,_G , ~~ ''�' 1 '1 C')r�1 F'O 1';.' -:�;r:� ..:� , l> !�niJ���'I " .'. '7 !J p "" r::J f\! 1 ( :! 1, 1. :::�~~:-�! - - ,.;:',I I ' : "''�' :1. <;; �'�: ("' (.l ! : 1::~ �( f (;�-c : . 'i l l�_ .L!''lf;\l;c c! :i. ::'�. t.E~ 1 y 1, :�.I ) r:J 1. :i ~ :; l l U: r:� t .hl'.! <:1 f O:J I'' O:.:c��:::<::\ .i Ll t:...:.t :< Dl 'l c: ornm �::~ r r: .i. <:'.1.). p <-l. j:J<-'1 1� � t 1.. a.n �:;:: <:\� :: .ion �~; b '/ d h ,-�ug ~~ t :.i.. n q �{�. 1-,,, p r� D '-1 -.i.. ,.., .i.. c:J11 �o;, ,.. , �f" ~:; r~c t. .i.r::~n ~?1. 0 (1.:.� ) of i� ' ;�:�:: i'J1. 1�.oi. n r1i�:' Jr�� �' T'I't �.: .l l":!t' ', �:'l'l'..l r" C u ri E�' ,. , f - - :.1. r ��~:r7 ;; as .:t_: f\( ' I i� 1 r::�c:, ,....:li ' :! 1:- i:':\:,;_ t:l,C_ -! � ! 1�. :\ 1' �-,~. ( ' f 1 i.. ~" !' � c :l~::;i :~ -~ ��:1 �� :�.~ ,.., ...~:, r\.:�1�� ., :i. l1 �J�:.r.::: ' ,,�.; �;::, t: d QjJJ.::)':~ .i. t . c II ~ �i.i .! l >j 1' i.'. i. r_ l t 'I"� <:; 1_1, 1,') �::; 1: j l. ll.t.!l2' I I)� C f 'l f\1 01�' '' ' c .i :� p .::l.p( -~1 '"<0 ; ~� ,.., I ' :� � (') ! . .., F' '1-:''i ,, 1-'>:: . ~:�; '"), r:: c,~ �j 1..\ 1. ��'' t .i c;, r1�.:� .... r� ' I , :1 ,., r,i �: !I! L �i I ., �J . -l. f' \ :j ll l:� c: � ' 1'1 (.) f r�n .1. 7 ~!. <) t. !�� ~ ~--~ 1'' (� ' f t'] 1'-1::.~;. f!i:-;�t :. !�. ~ � :� .1 ! 1 (~ 1'- 1�" ..\ ::::. '.: h �t. ::. t: l l��' IH"CJ fn i<::,�::r� : I'; �::, !:. P '.�' .; i 1� \C!I. I 1:: 1� \: � Cll ! I' ~.".' .._ h e� f \: ''.d �1.i. i l�1 t :i.�::; �:::;L\i:.' d �':\!"H.i c �' l ~�:�\ .~ l i . ' � �:- : ;; c' ~ - _, ::~: ~~' ~<: 1.: ,� !' �"' . ( 1 �l:.h ��! i. mpo<;:; :i. i . .; ,. �,r 1 �:�:: 11 1.:- ) l"''' 3~"" ~ \ 1! l: : �."' I' F> � . . �. I :� .:� I. .-: ... _�._�-~ ~- ? :'") ., �:.!c�r)(:)!::. '� �: j fl : 1 1. 1 : 1 f!H~ ! ' l t:. �i.. ! i ] r�n ' -... .�-���.-- ~ .' C.'iL' 1.')<::; <. i 1..: t.i �!..'. (�.:> <::, ( :.~ "!. ,__._ ' .' I'.. j 'l l".'l :_ : :i. . I : ~ �f c1 ~�.. rn >: �' f (')b i.� ;..\ i__ ! �~ _: i '\ l.J f iJ. ' '1tJ~- . 'l' t' (.'l ;"; ( ,,, , .� f ll.. l. h:' :i. � : l i .d . ' 1c:�' l. t �. h �::'l' ! ':. l �l'( l i ' ':Jh �::. 11�' 1 29 6
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 35 76 i. ss u a n ce, endcwsemen t., cw C:v:: c:E~ p !>"'.ne e nf debt i n ~� t,- ume nt s f ot- t he bcHrT CHI�JeF�s on accou nt~ for purpo s e of rele nd i n g or pur-chasing of r�ec::ei va b 1 r~s ancl other ob J. iga tion s . Th ese in s 'l:ru nH~ n ts ma y include~ bul: n ee d no t b s' l ifT>it.e d to~ p r�o m.i.ssa r �y Pot 1?. !'5 , r� e P '���' r��c: 1�1,? ! 'if? '"' \:1 r�� E t? m E~ n t. c5 , certi fi ca t es of assig nrn 0nt or parti ci pat ion, and simi l ~r inst rument s !::(t.ttL..r~~-<;.Q_h\.r.:.?.S'. �'=' s rn a y be au. +.:. ho r� .i. z e c.1 by t 1'1 e Central Bank of t he Philippines fo r banks a nd non - �b c:\n k -t' .i n ane .i c!\ l .i n t.~:~nt H'?d .i.at��.ies ~ F' r�� ov .i. d ed , h ov~eve r�, t h .;:~. t de:~ 1:> t .i n :::; t ,,.�urn t? n t ::; i.s;s ut:=.:- d by .irt:i?.r- b i:'H1k l o<?. n ~::, , .i nc l ud.i. ng th ose betw ee n or a mo n g q u asi ba nks s h a l l not be c:on ~;.i_ d �~n?d a s dt'~ po s:; i. t subs t i tute dE�bt i11 s tn. 1m r~ n Ls "; 5. On f )Prd :e mb t? r � ~:;u, .t 1i ElL ,, irnrnediatE.~l y a �l' ter p P i : :i. t :i.on e r�� d.i.�;.:;c: o ve r �t'?d th r: er-T cJn eous t p i:~y mr?n to t�� E'�:=;p c' t 11.:l e n t of th E! a �f'or�esa id <~mo ut �l t (:If F-'1 70, 4� 0 6, 13~5~ p et .i. t. .ione r� ~; u [)fn .i. t. tE?d V�l .i. t.: ll r��(�!' ::5 r �n nden t_ a -F or� tn i:\ 1 t r� equf'~Si f o t�� t:.hP. r� E' i' Llrl d t) f t. hr::1 ':i ii\ .i. ri amount or�� tt-v:? i�:; <:s u,"nc: E' o-f i'.l 1: ;,;.: r.:n ?cli. �l: memo c over ing t h o same; 6. F'l;~t� il . .i..onr::~t� h ,;, � �. fc1 ] 1,_,,.,, , ,,.! up t hn af cw �e sa.i.d c:l<.':\ ill fc.w n .:' f l..llitl �.:!:� c: n~ cl.i.t a n d that a S lxf �f iciE�rlt: t.1. me t tas i:~ J.r-� ei:H..I y elap se d, and r-� f!? ~.,; po nd t=mt ha s; not~ �>-�<~ t rnadt~ a f.in <;t l d F.~ci "i i on on t: h E.~ said c:J.ai m; 7. F:'E>ti t ion �� r- beli.r..,v eE.: tlvd: re s p n n ch ?nt may not bE' ab l e to q .i.ve h .i. ~:; �final decisio n o n the ~; a .id c l <.-:~.irn in dUE! time i-:\ nd in o. rd E:T to p r-t?VF!nt pr�r::? :;c r� ip t iurl o-f .i.. t!:i c:le:i.i.n'~ pE~t .i t. ion t;'r�� t. ;;; �f i l in!J t. h .i.<=; p e t i t i on f o 1� r-f~v.iew irt ,acc:o t��� cJ<: n c e ~~it:h l aw. In h is an s wer- to the petition for- r eview, respond ent ad mi t ted the:? '""' 1 J. e <;.J <~ t i.o n <:; in r-'ar� ,J.g r�,:.;~. p h s 1, 3 .:md 6 but �::;pE?t:.r.. f:i.c <:.\l l y d c~r>.i.t: ' d UtE! ~1.1. l. ENJ ati on 297
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3576 .. .. <l in paragraph 2 fo r l ac k o f know led ge or information sufficient to fonn a bt~liE�"f .:H::; to t.he t1'� u th ther�eof. Wheth E?r�� the amount o �f F' J7 0,4-06.E35 ~\1,:1S actually P�:\id to~ and r-ecei ve d by, thE' go v t~ r�nm e nt., acc or-�d ing c'5 Ubj HC: t of verification. a l !:;o a dmitted the de fin .it ion of "dt::? po s i. t !:;u bs.; t .i. t.u tt-:~!:; " unde ,,.. F~e v~;~ n ue Regulations No. 12-80 , impleme nting Presidential Dec:r�ee No . 1735, but he drmie d th e r��e st of t h e a verments in said paragraph a nd the 3 llegation s in 7 of tht::> petitio n , b eing me re ad mitt ed t hE.� .:1ll f2CJ ,::~ \: .iuns ir1 1='�'�'----:u;Jr � :q:th 5 of the peti t.ic:>n th e:~ t. in l. i'? t t. E.' r d "' t.ed relied upon in ~; upp cwt o'f th:! t"e qu r~ st i:\ rld the allegation that seid amount of P1 70 ,406.85 was t"?r-roneousl y paid, 'for� b ei ng erTClneou s cone: J. u s .ions of fact and/ o r law, th e truth b ei ng those s t ~ted as 293
. ,I . DEC I E-lI ON CTA CASE NO. 35 7 6 -�� r,.J:� ��-� s pecial a ncj a t f i t- mati ve de fe n s; v.~s of r � espon d ent~ to wit: :':1 . F' r:~ t .i.L tO ill:~r- ' �:; t�� :i.�J i tl: l:o claim th r_, r� efund/cn=.~d.i.t ha "; p r �c:' !�>i: t�� :i. l tc t1 p �11--:5 U C:Hlt Lo Sect i. o n :?CJ:.:~ cd tllr:~ 1 9T7 T <~ :�: Co de. Th E? 35!. t a :< was a 1 J. egecil y paid nn ,J i:l: .n ur~r-y :.z::::; ~ .1981. Th e pE�tition f tw n :?ViE)I�'I was �f i l ed with t hi s Honorab l e Co ur t on J a nuary 2 4 , .19 8:3, or bv.?yond ~~ )l f~ ,:~r s �fn::Hn ti-1r:? d ate o �f paymen t of t h 2 tax ; 6. Un d::=!t��� Sect ion :~~ r;l 2!, �r.:\ :< Code of 197'7 ~ no suit tor t h E� n=covF:~ry of n a t i ona 1 i. r1 t~:!n"la 1 r��p ve nl.I E' t:a:�: �:; h al J. be beg ,;:~. n af ter 1: h e e :q:dx c.~ t .1.. nn o f fr om date of payment of th e '7. The ~)5'1.. t c:t >: on .ird:: e l�� :-~s t income fr�om c: omm t-:~ r�� c: i c:~ J. p a per� tr Et n sacti.o n~ p c1.ic.1 by p e t i t i o n e r� as b o rTO~'Ier o n pn::> m i~:;sor�y noti~:'S .i.s su E:�d, wa s; c:o ll ~�~ ct.r~r:l .i. n :'�'l::c ot"(.j .:;mc:e ~J.i.th 1.-~w <::\r ld r- e gLt l :1 tj . c")l' 'l ~:; ; 11 c.~n c.:r? ~ i t .i ~;; not n:? ft.tn d ;=:1 h 1 �:�'; 8. I t i.~.; incu rnb <:� nt upon pet. i tioner� to ~; hc::>w compl i. .::mce with th r.? p r�ov.i~>.ions o i ' Sect ions 292 an d 295 of th8 Nation a l I nt. er�nal FevE'~nue Co c:le r :~f' .l9T7 ~ as .:une n d C�? d ; 9. A c: La.i rn for re fund is co n stru e d stx.ic:t ly �"� !J �O.Iil'lst c: l c:1irnants~ si n c: p ,-a c l aim to r- Y"E.'f un cl p.=,.r. t<~kes of t h E' n ,::d u n:;_~ o �f i::ln e;<ern p t.ion fi'"Orn t. ;,;~. :�: <:�. t..i. o n ( Com m .. of Int. F\:e v .. vs. L E-~dc?. s rn.:~~ G .. FL ~�lo, L�.. l'750 c1~ 31 SCF\?~ r-;5 ,Jam.t,31''Y 3 0, 1 1?> '/'0 ). � : In r�e pl y t o the ()'(' re:�s pond e n t ~ I, 1: p e t i t i o n r? r s ta t p cf t h at .it!:; c: la:im fo r- r"e �fund .'c: n~ clit. 293
DECISION CTA CASE NO . 3576 .� .. ~=' peti t.ioner� had un t i 1 J an u a r�y 2:::. ~ 1. 17'8::;. vd thin wh ic h to f i l e i t s petition for rev.i.e~" ~ t .h r) t~. :: su bj ect o t t h e claim h i3.Ving been p a id o n a,-a nu ary 23 ~ 1.981. Sun d ay, pet.i t ;_ onr?.r� l1 ad u n t.i l J MlU t iF' Y :? '1�, l9f:35 (the next worki n g La y f ollo wi n g S und a y) w .ith in w h ic h to 'fi l e i ts pet .i t.i.m1 'for n:-?vi<? t.-J., (.) 'f te r� t .he~ i.:;s LIt?'::; IIJE~ r� (?. j o i r1 E~d :� !�. 1�1 i ~; c: d ~; e v~ c-.\~? se t few h ec:H� ing . called h eat�� ing pet..i tio n e r� ~;imp ly rnad e a. mani'fes tc-d:.i.on t:h ;-~t " t h t? cL:d.m f u1�� n : fu nd i s bE?in g t . l��cc: ca~'5E' . objections CH" j_11 t.f'J t" pos<::-d by I:!V ! :11"l j I I c�:; t21. n Ct-~S ~~~1 �1en petitioner moved t h n C::d'S f�! beca u sE~ p et: .i tion~? l'' :i.n l':t-:� 1'1 < :1.-: ~ d j t~; 1r~.i tr1es ses Of" mi:. r� l:: c: ()fll (l o�j s s i 01'1f�'? r-- documen tar�y e~ v i d <::-?n c:E!. peti tionet-, how evt-:.� r�, a nd n ei th er did p e t i t i one r o'f fer d n 't docurne n t a t-- y E:!v .i.d~.:mc:e 1'\lh.ic.: h wou 1 d p r�o ve involved .in this c:,:;~<;e~. 300
l� DECI S I ON CTA CASE NO. 3 576 is claim \>Jhi r: t�l i r:v o l y p:;:; pu n;~ l y ta:-:es . the or� igin,':\ls o-f th t~ n -?CF! i. p t:�.c:; l:u L�r� s u bm .i. t.t.r.:?cl to respondent o n CJ c: tobE~t-� 2 9 (J.fi'8 1 ) a �f te r.. whi c h t h E?y then s ubmit th E� c a~-; e �f o r�� d E!C:: i_~::; :i _o n ;:~�f t E�r� �f 1. ] .in q their respective me~or a ndum s x .. .,\I II No uf as l:r> Lh P by the parties. 1'-leit h e!r� d i d th e y fi le l'>'.i.th i:h.i.s Cc>ur-t the ' ' nec r.:�~:;s .::~r- ~' p lf'i.\d.in cJc.; '' c~r�� t l��r' i r� r�� f>f.; p r::!c:tiv�:> memor�antfum <:.; . .. ,.., t:_I-IC? [;no _,\ I'- t. .�: �: . ~ or�dered that th .i~::; c :\ <::; r~ tl r,~ !3u 1J m.L +: t. r::- r1 f u r � d r::�c: i ':;; i n rt . I t i ~s thus c:le :u .. bf:?yond doubt th c.d : . �te:n �r:? i r..:; no ground or b<:~s.i~:; upon which -!: hi ':; CnLw t c:: a n issu r? a judgment ordering r~ s ponden t to r e fun d or credit to herein petitioner the a moun t in v o l ved in its clai m. Settled is the rule that in an a c tion for tax refund or c r t~d .i. t . ~ pet.i t.ionf~ r� ha s; t h r-? l:>t..n� r.:le:? ll o �f proof to s h ow that .it i. s r:~nt.itl E?~ d l:.o t.h~:? n ;!�fund or 301
- ,I.' �, DECI SION CTA CASE NO. 357 6 .. .. H .... p r��F~ S ~..lil\ � :~d to in accor�d a nce ~...,i th 1 ato,~ s a nd r� E~ t;J U J. a t:in tl s o n t he rn a t: tE;> r . Peti t i r.m e ~- h av :i. rl!J involve d herein, t: h is; Co u r�� t <::- ou 1 d no t 1. o o k w i. t h appr�ov a l {.,cj th at- refund of tax e s u n doub tedly pa r t a k e s o f t h e n atu re of an e :-:e rnpti. o n , a nd th e s.~. fll E' C: <�:mn u t be-;> a 1 J. owe d unles s g~--a n t f � d i 11 �: he mo s t e. :�~ pJ i c i 1.: ;;, r-l d Ci:\ t (;~yc� r�.. ica l J. anguage?. .ln c:: . V , .� " L.. -� ::;, Ll ~"l .i.m ,; f o r s i.n r.:f.:! a c: J ,:�:I.irn f o r.. r� r~fu r1 1..:l :L ~5 .in t.: t�,,., na tu r��e of i':\n e:�:E!mpt i on fr� om t .c1:�: <1ti.on. Revenu e vs; . l.... r:�d �"�' ~5 tfl a ~ 1....- :1. 7~5 0 9, .Jd tl,. ::::. 0 , 1.97 0 , ::-::. 1. SCRA 9 5 .) As set ~ o rth i n Co mm iss io ne r of Inte r nal Re v e nu e vs. C3t..t E~ r -r-- e n:J ~ L-<~OBl2 , S t-~pt . 1. 2 ~ .1. 967~ 2l SCRA .180: 1. 90 6, in Ca t:. h o:li. c Chu n : h , ,.c.. y . :1 .. vs. ?k tinq Comrn .i. ~:;s i nrler� o f C u ~:; tum s , l.L h a s b ~:-:~ e n t h e 30 2
- -- '. DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3576 -- 9 .... constant and uni �fnr� m hc1lding that e:�:empt.ion �fr.. orn ta:-:atic1n is not �favor-�ed and is never.. presumed, so that i f granted i t must be st~.,i. ctly construed against the ta:-:payer.. . Af �finnatively put~ the law fr� nwns on e:-:emptinn �from hence, an e>:emptinq pr�ovisi o n !:.hou 1d be construed $. .t ,. i C t� .i $ $ J:..m.i ...............i. ~.~..r.. i -~~-- � II , (Cathol .i .c: Chun.: h vs. Hastings~ 5 Phil. 701; E s so Standard Eastern~ Inc:. v s . Ac: t.i.nq Comm.i.s s i.mu:~ r- of Cu s t .om s ~ 1.. - 21.84.1 ~ Oct. 28~ .1.8 SCRA 488; Phil. A c: t~tylene v ~; . Commissioner of Internal Revenue~ 1.... - 19707~ Aug . 17, 1967~ 2 0 SCRA Comrn .i.s sioner- Internal Revenue v s . Guerrero~ L - 2 0942~ Sept. .1967~ 2 .1 SCRA .1.80; t�1anU. �'!':\ Ele c t:.r-�.i.c Co. vs. ~) f:? r" a~ 1.. -. � 2 9987~ Oc t. 22 ~ 1.975~ 67 S CRA 3 51..) WHEREFORE , finding the petition for review without mer� it~ the s ame is dismissed and the refund/credit sought is hereb~ denied. SO ORDERED. Quezon City~ Metro Manila~ June 2.1.~ .1.989. titu~f�~~1~~~J At1/'.tffE � ILL En Fr,:-?r .i .di g ,Jud ~ re 303 L
.. - DEC I SION -� CTA CASE NO. 3576 .. � 1. 0 �-� WE CDI\ICI.m ~ ( nn 1 t"? '"''' E ) CONS TANTE C. ROAOUIN (.)ssCJcl.atP ,� rud!] c~ 1~:')2-~ .). j / E.X-- REYES (.'ssoc:iat.:G Judqe~ C E R T I F I C A �r J 0 N I h e r e b y cer�U. fy th at: this det:i :-:. inn rea c he d a fter� due cc>nst.tlta t io n a morlfJ t he rnE~rnb e. r �"'; ryf th e Cour- t of T;:,, :: .i.l l t:Ju~t4~:1,;(;:-L:?;;~} f\1'11~1\1 r o/F I ~LER r:� r�r~ ':;; .i. d :i. n g ,Juri q f' C u ur�t of Ta:�: {~ ppe a ls 304
More in CTA Decisions
- UNITED GRAPHIC PRINTING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10610)
- THE ARISTOCRAT FRANCHISE CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1575)
- TBG DEVELOPMENT PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 237)
- STOCK TRANSFER SERVICE, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5796)
- CTA Case No. 2553 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2553)
- TS TECH PHILIPPINES, INC. represented by TS TECH TRIM PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8178)
- MIRANT (NAVOTAS II) CORPORATION (Formerly SOUTHERN ENERGY NAVOTAS II POWER, INC.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 226)
- CTA Case No. 717 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 717)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.