CTA Case No. 1959 (Decision)

m 'EP Tl\UC 0 . PRILIP'PINb!' ' , COURT 0/ l'.' X APPEA.l.B QUhZON CITY I -� - Cil . A. i � 9) - - -- - -- . ... :- .... f i 1~ ~ ~. ~1 . c l ~ ' \,) is r t deei�� �n c.t r ~.onr �:n J.."' c . e ~... r f' .. u to r t G rs. t l ll!( Q au (6) .ru.c' �-#>�or -. r (e) n p �) r t on oti � c ... at.ed -�n ~ 01 e r fl 5 11

� �� t' t 0 �t If �t ,, .t ''~ ' .� ) '\1- � ) 55

c ' " ' ... .. ..,.. 56 �,

Se Itf>f, � 1,. 59 � 1. w. ,. . 1 f th t ..:c �~~ !n �1v 6. fl" " m. ttl ' Ms~ o f �' ..'l~j J" �r pe r t < 1.-l::s pcrs m ~� t t e ' r- :rt "" eon f!!-rued t Ul'.t s id DO s ... r.t it . mpe.r '0 t e le !: e s, 1t 1 tr; o~.ue t ' J.- .. ... .. �ru"# ~ � ~ roo - ll, . r- ;x ." X h~ . ce.a i:r.-1 v re H" u~ ' II 57

� .1. ) .. .. ,f c' � I' 58 I

� 1 c � \ n: t "'1"' t ... �r e, - u ' r rt i l.. :r "Vi 1 ''� r:�.i ~bow t.Ji \, s,t...I t tlf~ill. . be 1n r 1e e .. . ttl ' u� � 1.4 ' '> ... t 1 ""'e 1 ' h r~ ' c ,� ' e rtJ.cla .... c ll 0 r.eer :� tl y t Uts ly t � 0 ca � ( :! t..e � cu - ~I .I 5� 9

..... 4 l ;fJi' ..r i t f \l 0 .j, C L~o t orr itu . ti.p~..ll ' n or .re -ov r �:l.;. j :tr udul .. t ' pi e �t. ot :r I> l t~ .""ieh i.n,; rt� """ ' ..:n )0 i the e, a .r ~r , r 3.1 � c ... t the t io11 r � .~ 6 0 '