cta_decision CTA Case No. 628628 1962-10-24

CTA Case No. 628 (Decision)

I ,;' ./v/.-:;, /'[~tl"' j

/ 2 .. 2 - 9, l J 10 r r �1 1 1 1 llC r ... � t' 1957 , t t t r 1 ci rt t y uc , r c .o or 0 � 3, � r t r2, 19 ri t d .) �( � lt-, t s p.l ; 1 r, t .. t e r 17 ,, l 5 ' 0J I 19 ' r u t r 11 t tion o' 1 f' ;;" ' t 0 0 1t r ct s uc r c.) ( r . ' 1 c �' Pr l � ... 7, t r � pll :.1 ' fo ' 1 .. 1 r hr er 1 y h ..ctur .� t ; pp . 118- 119 , 1-l 2 , r) t 1 OI':. i t 0 d l t es 401

3- 0 .. 7t . � ' .) tl ; t 1 tr 1. _. , ' t 01 rb i c1 c � { r� � t c , 'l t 9., r po t ' t t rr 9 ' ' . r c.) � r 3t 5 ' r r ll t r ' Ol s1 � � r 1 t 195 t V li h ~ ti io J y1 , ,.t r' c or

- t J. r 57 bl t t r r tt r 0 c io � 1 t 'l t c'

.. ~ ... ' 0 plic b 0 � 0 - 1 1 r. r 11 io r �' P� � 1) or 0 at 11- t r 0 ' i' r1 1, 't of . -' c ip r 1 h r. ' � 9 1) t t' 1 ry 7; ' 1- r .t , 0 ew s y c 7, th t il t 0 0 ra 1 ' t ot b 1 0 t. 4 0 L!

(. c. ( 1 t. ' 'I 1. 4 ) or .. l l .~ ~ t� 'V:f.- ~ Ol � " 1. ( t. 7 t � � T"'".)' � 5'. ''i � . 1 l' 0 !'J .r y, ~� J 1 t Ct b ii -1 s it or .... � � P �.i.l . 3 l) � te l' �ir '. c~ .J� .l, 5 t te or ...,. . 0 e 0 t1- t 1o c0 t tp ~:to�., l!' <;.; y ppl1e �'e 7, 1951, w e h r"'.� 1 �l io r l th 405

7 � ' c r, h r 0 t1o 0 r � 0 t l37 ic c o. � t h 0 0 tr () h 0 ' � � o. , l� 1 p1 . 5). 92 , te 5, o, 1 ' 0 e Yr . r0 0 c t l 'i thr i of 1 t p 1 � 0 �, v1 0 90~ 1c ' tv 0 �0 � ' 1 0 0 ld io , ci p 1 he r s- c l r ru 0 1 0 e. , i h ll oll 1 , t1 ly, 406

C".1'. -- o. 2 0 t i Otl r � 0 c t �� � 24 l � '0 407

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.