CTA Case No. 4000 (Resolution)
�~tf'UJIIUC OP' ;''U'� t'HII .l.-_.l"'" ~.Q\i~J OF TAX APF.EALS Ql~�- W~ CI!Y Sll'""H U A�D CH 01/ co. (t>1.1lippin .P titioner , - ver UD - C.T.A. CASE NO. 4000 L espond nt. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X ' E ~ 0 L U '1' l u .l Act n or. tt 1 otion �o 1 t df', w P �t tiox ' filed by petit oncr on ov o r 7, 19 { , �ith re. pondent' .s co fornity 0t roun t u of It tern l ieven~e h ace pt d p t tl t �ttl t '1c c it oldin tax t .,o c w tn p l ion r p y r t J:J.t of .d~, 37. vi . rox cop1 ..., o � .... ~ ...ion c ipt Io. -lJJ( r rJo . bot. d t f2 Jov. 2;;, 19 l, t l c~or 1t t 1tio r� r v 1 b d ar tti c t r ln ted. t tro 1 11a, '- (on c �s�1.'A f ociat
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.