CTA Case No. 442 (Decision)
-... � I I 1 - 100
... i !. ' I�' �_,~� .; " ,.. 1. ' ,.., r "" on 'i l f:.>:> 0 1 t v. .o~ c � . � ' r"l�. c � i0 l ..� p y " ... 'V l:� n � .. .�. ,), d l' ( ol .-~ - ~. s� ~ l � �~~~��� � � � " " l � "'9 � . . ......� � � � ���� ' �������� ' i' 101
'' 'l lJ :\~ .. ~. 'I � � - .... a . n1 e1 d o f 1 :r to �or.. � r � tf'lf& '!0\rd o � .rl ,. p � - n, . � .';If:& � h.i" it p .. "'T t c., X" '!~~ I � p. ..r roc.}. st >J ,. 1'} 1, p t � t. . ff t ' ur G:t I~��te �.L v nu !� r 't Q � . e ,l\E;-;. t in 4UrM 1,1 t � � � .� ;;;� �$ .I ~ttin resp n an IJirt ec./. /ft ( K :ts:t ' . ' t ~ � tci:tll u .",..7 51. ~or.. t 1 i.o r m � G'JW . .. � ... { L xt11..:>it ll. p. 4 !Jl.~l X c.}. ., 11 - !.1 e ' f 1.'1'3 �pon "~ .t ... C+3 i . y CC't(i .. r J'.9 � $ '':>1. H Ol .. ~eve � l.' 14, 19;,.~7_. p �t1t1 n t r s or d t t .l ved ~ o th g-o nd tn t t s �, 1 i l'� thi.Z y ( J s. Pot t i iiOr and in ope � c �� �t , 1 ed l v r. GvUl' �th di l. .. .t 1 r- :f.~ n cc � ro eJ:sy t~ ~t titi l r f ail t cn pr -t . o JO'el: nt t~. CO'� X da a a:r le r c . 1veo. y it t a , i~ r � ( ~J.l , durin, . nc.. l �~~�4,. It iu ~ n t ..r.t:' d - r ,o t �0 re . c f 1 r et-rt~ .'i ~ .s.. l0bl ic . ;;:�;/ i� 10 2
lJ Cl ~- .fY-4 � G.l.. � CA _ :iCJ., 442 :.ii t witlh d and p. id, in p ~ Se t1 n II! ci the r � A �\lrl 1.n r �el � i~n to . ticlt 7 a c(_) o th� J>J.it' .ttoJ.d ng t.�x w , .. ep bli: ct �o....so). u t ut ~ ~ � 1t is int 'in d n a f of pet1- y .t t h . 1t y ot r� �c t on f:.l ( ) of t , T f t � n lty. i r rt1ne po cf l v1 pon th1.eh th co "" . lie i { el 1 s .of t f 11 'II I l l 103
- � n ) e I � � v uc ~I or ,, 104
� -- n cl ,, 105
,, 106 '
More in CTA Decisions
- PMFTC INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2613)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-25 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-25)
- LAPANDAY AGRICULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2300)
- FRIENDLYCARE FOUNDATION, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 3056)
- CTA Case No. 1185 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1185)
- KUEHNE + NAGEL, INC. v. CITY OF PARA?AQUE and JESUSA E. CUNETA, in her capacity as the City Treasurer of Para?aque(CTA Case No. AC-189)
- ISOLA ASIA PACIFIC (PHILS.) INC. [formerly Sumisola Corporation] v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6173)
- FORT BONIFACIO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10425)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.