CTA Case No. 442 (Decision)
-... � I I 1 - 100
... i !. ' I�' �_,~� .; " ,.. 1. ' ,.., r "" on 'i l f:.>:> 0 1 t v. .o~ c � . � ' r"l�. c � i0 l ..� p y " ... 'V l:� n � .. .�. ,), d l' ( ol .-~ - ~. s� ~ l � �~~~��� � � � " " l � "'9 � . . ......� � � � ���� ' �������� ' i' 101
'' 'l lJ :\~ .. ~. 'I � � - .... a . n1 e1 d o f 1 :r to �or.. � r � tf'lf& '!0\rd o � .rl ,. p � - n, . � .';If:& � h.i" it p .. "'T t c., X" '!~~ I � p. ..r roc.}. st >J ,. 1'} 1, p t � t. . ff t ' ur G:t I~��te �.L v nu !� r 't Q � . e ,l\E;-;. t in 4UrM 1,1 t � � � .� ;;;� �$ .I ~ttin resp n an IJirt ec./. /ft ( K :ts:t ' . ' t ~ � tci:tll u .",..7 51. ~or.. t 1 i.o r m � G'JW . .. � ... { L xt11..:>it ll. p. 4 !Jl.~l X c.}. ., 11 - !.1 e ' f 1.'1'3 �pon "~ .t ... C+3 i . y CC't(i .. r J'.9 � $ '':>1. H Ol .. ~eve � l.' 14, 19;,.~7_. p �t1t1 n t r s or d t t .l ved ~ o th g-o nd tn t t s �, 1 i l'� thi.Z y ( J s. Pot t i iiOr and in ope � c �� �t , 1 ed l v r. GvUl' �th di l. .. .t 1 r- :f.~ n cc � ro eJ:sy t~ ~t titi l r f ail t cn pr -t . o JO'el: nt t~. CO'� X da a a:r le r c . 1veo. y it t a , i~ r � ( ~J.l , durin, . nc.. l �~~�4,. It iu ~ n t ..r.t:' d - r ,o t �0 re . c f 1 r et-rt~ .'i ~ .s.. l0bl ic . ;;:�;/ i� 10 2
lJ Cl ~- .fY-4 � G.l.. � CA _ :iCJ., 442 :.ii t witlh d and p. id, in p ~ Se t1 n II! ci the r � A �\lrl 1.n r �el � i~n to . ticlt 7 a c(_) o th� J>J.it' .ttoJ.d ng t.�x w , .. ep bli: ct �o....so). u t ut ~ ~ � 1t is int 'in d n a f of pet1- y .t t h . 1t y ot r� �c t on f:.l ( ) of t , T f t � n lty. i r rt1ne po cf l v1 pon th1.eh th co "" . lie i { el 1 s .of t f 11 'II I l l 103
- � n ) e I � � v uc ~I or ,, 104
� -- n cl ,, 105
,, 106 '
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.