CTA Case No. 332 (Decision)
\ � .. liiLIPPIN~..I .AI:.Pk~ TI \~~ A in1strator of the d ceased a d�~' !a de la str lla oria. o GJ iud� de Cerdeir , etitio er, ��� � 332 -v sus - t . ~ c iJ 14 Tl� C LI.E.CT t"- ~-lAc 1tj VE � J. \, .. 1 L [- , J j..s-V, espond nt. (; .( ' . ...... -x -- -- - - X� - -.. 11)/ / ft~Y � rj E tJ I 1 O. a hi i' n appeal lnterpo e y petitioner nton!o po a, as inistrator of the estat of th dec� sed ora ria � la strell� ~ori noV a . 1 ctor of Intern l ev � a in in t iln fro t of 16l , o7 . 9~ as t nee t x s , ncl~d�ng interests an pen lties, n t e transfe o intangible person 1 properties situated in the Philippines at longin to said r!a d la strell or ano a. de Cerdeir � aria � la strolla or1ano d�. ~ r ir ( arta "erd ir~ fo sho t) is a p n 1 11 ti al reason of her rl to a pan1 1 citi x n and as a resident of ran ier, rroco fro 1931 Ul) to er eath on January 2, 195~. At the t f her de i& she left, ng others, intangible person 1 opert!es
� o. 32 - 2- tn the Philippines. epte ~ 29 , 19~5, petitio er filed a pro� visional estate ana !n ritan~� ta return on all th pzopezties of t � late ar a er e!ra. the s e date, respondent, pen lng nveat!g t n, lssu d assessment or estate and 1 erlt nee taxes in the reap ~tive a unts of 111 , ~2. and or 1~7 , 791.48 , a total of 269 , 3. 6, hie ax 1 a ilit � by petttloner (p. 6, ecor s). On ove r 17, 19~~. n ended ret n fled ( xh it � � , p. 75, rd ) ~ eln � personal properties with t � cla as ex te fr taxes. r 23, 1955, re po ent, p din v tig tion, ued anot � ass � t f r estat xs1nte unt of 2, 262. 2. 4, es ct1 ely, or a total of <469,665. 2 r or a) . In a letter d te J ary 11, 19 � reapo � t ie t � est for exe t n o t e ound that t � la of s o reciprocal to ection 122 of � atl I ternal eve � ode. ence , re � pondent eaanded t � pay nt of t e su � f 239, 39.49 representing deficiency estate ta ce taxes and co .rom1 al lea ( �x lt � , pp. <4- 5, recorda). In a letter, date e ary , 1956, and re� be ollowlng ay, t!tloner .re ested tor t � reconslderati of the eclsion deny� tng tM c:lala for tax ex t o of the tntang le pu� sonal properties and the osition of t 2 a d 595
I� .,A E O. 32 - 3- co s) . ver. respon tnt n is eat. in hts lett r d ted ay , 19 (Ex its �K� and 1" � p � 126-1 � ~ ec r ) rece v to r n y 21 . 1 56. � pon nt .p:r 1 the oundt that t er �a no r ciproc !ty of r n ier law with Philippine 1 nd that the ity f l er wa� a re rlnc lp lity, ot a fore n c: ntry. n� �� ently, res o nt nde nt of 73, 1. 21 8,02 tiv y, r 1 of 1 1, 7 � f ci nd �nh r ta s incl s , nt r t d c pe 1tles. In a 1 tt r , d t , nd r c lv d y espo nt n . y 26, 9~6 . p tit ht n th c ithh ld until ar- .Jo qutn mir z, ho t n p r on 1 cr c ( blt �L� � p. 129 , c rd � r� coun 1, ln a 1 tt r of July 2, 1 56 r c ved y espon nt n the fol1 y , c no - 1 � re spo t � 1 tt r y� est d� r con r tlon f h ni 1 - it '~. p � 1 -172, din t tax r c ). In v etted t ti n r on u c- lty ifle c py of t rita c of Tang er � n o r h t a c t on aa to th r or ot th 1 t d y th 596
- 4- � c ty in its c � � s v n s te po - s int rn t on � rson lit �" (Exhf lt � p. 17 � I r cord). Int 0 co n c tio � d d ep 17 22, ly, etit enclo nt � upport r X pt!o { of t� cl t �p n � pp. co ). 1 3-1 4, t r � 1 56 ( �xhib t � � # 0 n rc er n ov �1 ( - v 1). n t 0 n r - 1' c n 1 f 1, - � r t nc �1 � s tt v f 1� � th ttl er f l t0 t� � th � ch the t c � ~. 59 7
. T. � E � 2 - 5 .. Th r � no d aput t n the p rtie regard- � 1n t he properties n th th ttcal corr e tn s of t h ef c ey ssess nt. enee he is u � � ca y ' foll � elat � o t � f st s ue, res de t a tt nt nd - i ta � - eon of � �1 tions or �� 1� t0 on do n of th � crl t ve .rio ht t ct � 1125. of t by th Coll �� gr i y tr de ay 5, l 6 conslde � a t c 1 0 hi Court. ., .� 59
C 'I c � � � � o. 32 ver, 1 spondent reop ned the caae and grant pet �t on r r h ring y re �ir in t � latt r to ub t dd tion 1 ev d nc to the in erit c tax 1 ~ ~ of Tan r nd ord r to v rlfy her or not it a n sov r n t t po ss n - an intern t lon 1 rson 1 ty" . Th r op nin nd r - earin f the c se p rt k s of th n tur of r nt of � ne tr 1 n r u nt to ct on 1 n 5 f ule 37 of h ul s of Co rt , h t ff c of v - c t n r spond nt' s jud nt c 1 on of y , 19 6 ( ort n r son o. vs . Coli ctor , c.T.A. C o. 254, r 2 , 19 7) . hu , th r nn n_ of th t h t y� y er - ct on ll. o i.e t t r- dent' a 1 its � nt 6 ( x- �n 2 ). t ton or ie t 0 on 1 f th or n � ntrodue case . � f ct h t t ur �t t n �h n 0 l- lnal c � 0 f qu r it 0 1 flndin � 0 t h d to in th ew deci on 0 r r 29, 1 56. It on r c v d th c i i on ly � t co the !natant pet t on � 19 � ly l v (12) d ys d � f 1- lo s t h t t al w th 1 nt r y 599
ECIS - .T.A. C E O. 32 o. 11 � n ft e ond t rns upon r soll.l ti n 1 In- t1 f s ct on 122 f te nal hlch 600
� - 8- r� ln urn ceo nted yce:r i ' icatl n a r ic v � 0 ul ( ctln 1n the f � hUi':'! pin 1: 0 t c ul r r� n ativ ) ai f cJ. ls. Th ce:rttf c ad f oll �� � 2 601
c ��� �2 - t oth r h nd. r t c t~nd th t p ti- t annot cl t on from the Philipp � t nd inh r t nc t x n the follo in 1 (1) pet tlon r f 11 d to prov th l or l 0 an r h ch ly r nt r clpr e 1 X. t mpt ion; ( 2) th co on h 1 of r n- 1n 92 d 1932 1h!ch t t ty 0 t nt -thr y f r J nu ry 2. 195::.>. h t dc n d n t prov th l 0 y tt ' r do t r nt th 1 t Xe y ct1 n 122 of tion 1 n C ; n (4) t Int 0 n t co n z d t t y th Phil� n v c y th tion f it! n r' cl 1m r nt 1 1 rt n t vn ov � l X pti n IX or 1 � h 1 of n r� fore! n 1 t er of ct n n 1 (� a s v. 1 u. � 19 � 1 3). Co nt y. t exist� r v in t1 ctory n th 1 tion of f ct � 0 uc law Sy 1. v. y 1 � 16 eation cr � up aa to .r r � .. �1" . .. -1" ..r�.. co st tu 602
ISI � 32 . T. A. .. 10 - � exi � of the r 1er 1 w p n ,f.ch p t- r' � tlon cla for �� ptto 18 edtc .cl. � h! e a fore! la , or th:l.~ att�... le angier 1 � y pr ve � u er � provts!o f o;i ction 41, ule 123 o th ules o ourt, y ial u 11- cat! th 1:e f o copy t et d th ff r having leg~l custody of e r c rd, or y his puty, nd 1� c r i ca f n o c i th Phlllppu1e fo~ i n r ce st~tione 1n that fore! n coun ry ept , an uth nticated by th 1 1 h of ce, ti � 41 of ule 123 i t 11- r in t p.r e1u tio etent to PJ: v t� 0. t e1 ork � 1, 61 il. 4 ci lly 1n � c ae of tlC aa n or in nee x la on h nc of p.ro rt. � te 1 c � o hr th t OS ntio. in tion 1 of ule 12 � s auff cient lon it ti f ctorily est l th ex1stene or n n- xi t e 0 t, T r1 s to th s1tion uf 1 rita ce or cc sion ta n v� 1 $ . � .lie e that Xh it D- " � 1 � - 1" �t�, consid r d to ther, hollv co pet nt ev - .~ce of the p tic l r 1 of rangier. Yr ex c te by offlc als, o, y reason of h ir uties, to coov rs t thi par cular 1� 603
� 332 - 11 - of t � c ntry f ie h y ue ffic .tals. And y � iaf ~ 11y establish 1 of T ier on the n�li bll!ty o va l� oper~y locate in an ier fo ece � tax � r os �� ��po 1 o contends t at e nts on tn la o 1n 19~ nd 1932, wbich re a t thirty nty�thre years fore ate f t MO ia a . � Car eira ot r � h l w f aai cou try at t t ~ h. I t . � - n c � 1s to t0 l � �t t x- .. � r th n r l.bi � -1 .-1� ,,d i Ty c t -1 r la of ca nt of 'I t t er i� c � !a r ir, nn r f ~re In th c r- 1n ru stl n, l! y xr s c :cti 1- � ty ye � l ht l � or l� t1on h \. thtn � 6~ (dd), ule 12 ul f qu ntly, pr or a to t contrary, t la of n itr of J v:y � 1 32, 0 fy:in t ahir of �Y 1 � 'l 25, �� prov in xh its �D-1", ... ... ��� .. -1" � � -1� end �T� , stlll tn force n J uary 2, i9e.~ (see In e ... &- , 27 784). Jus 6 0 tl
EC I :Y - C.T�� C E r � 332 - 1�"- - espond t 1 ew! e ar u t at laws of Tangier c!o not nt th c1p ocal tax ex ption requ ed by S ction 122 of our T X do for t r a so. t at t id 1 w e.lt t �- 1 pro �� T4l y 1- zena not r d t h ly fro b f 1nher t nc tax. ccor gly, t y c 1 0 r- c proca1 to aaid ec 0 12~. . ieh r vide f r th � exe pt 0 11 pplnes fr estate n :rit ce t ly. u ur t ceor c tax� ts t � 1� t ry ... w t ea 0 f T ,. et1on. he y in :.ri c x in n o leally, y pr ciple f ne- ral a v r n ral ter 1 f. nr � nr 1 t � expr cc :x a uld lly. 605
IS! u. 332 C.T.A. - 13 - 1., I n 1 0 road � th for , tr it c nt R n x etion the rty on ath. It in 1 on n- er t ce t X f u d co str ' und r to � t x, ich l l on th c t pon ath, herit c n t a 0 r c ivln ld p tv c n t nt � �n 0 f S2, . yin D ir 12� cl 1 c n� 1 0 � i 1 c nt t �.. t c ion 122 0 11 n -- r c n�z cl y c ry t x cut t, t. r ti n 1 lly ��� nh n so r niz � 1 1 c y lt t � co t p 1 f co �l ct o�� �� t, c te.r �eountr t X 0 �f co n r 606
2 � 14 - � 2 ( ) of t ~ of r 2� ta � a � 227. � 2 � c ap. 1 6� icb ��� � tax ~re tine tt f ta -- f rei Y� re era t hat f e t lavy f r the tlo l at \ ter t �� nt.ey t es f �� - n eo tax and e 2� f al � c 2 � 1� 1 � � try�.. Q 607
� 332 - 15 - foun n r v nue Code. Th sa!d proviso $tateG that n estate , in r t ne and g ft tax s shall eoll et n tang bl ron 1 es of a d - ced nt , at tb t m of his d s a r !d nt of a -.f--...~...._;;;;..;..o;.;.,;,;;;.o:;.4 ic t t t of hi ath death t x, or t he l a s of wh ch ( f re n co nt ) l r exe pt on f o transfer t x� o ath t t !bl per- so al pr t �� y c t!z n not reatd!ng t re � T � express on co ntry� , used n the pr v so , s n featly e plo th n . of ov~rn- � nt c ld not p atr af r de th t x, rt l f � lc 11 a 11 r ex pt fr �f�r taxe or th ta t 0 ve nt it r f rs. t r t f � or 1 p ich en oya � status an t ture of n nt r - ti 1 per on, or th t of r ly pol1t c 1 nt ty 1c , oa not en oying st ua d t t~re, 0 uch nsf r xe upon 1 t n ibl rson 1 �y r hos l ll s 11 1 no � oove us to certain n c nsi the r� pose or pur b hind t ' n ct. nt of th la t pro- vlso of ection 122 of our T x Cod � h last prov so of ct on 122 of th x Code as en c d to avo d th 11 f dou 1 t x t o , o avoid the po t fer or th t ~ \lpon int ng b p r n l pop .t h for 1 l nd the 1 of th for � r s rpos is s il to 60
c. r�� o. 32 -l - t t of c ion 2 a ( ) of t he u. � venu ct of tr n f er v 1 21 . S i p vi to to e co ra for 1 n c ntri t or i p r on 1 r r by our c i en t r by provi n our c itiz n t c qu 1 ' ch prop rt i t r ein . s & 1ut r y pur r co r llin c in dt rh 1 c untrr' foun in t h prov so r f r t r n y- in t h st t u nd t t ur of n �n r n 1 or ot r . il t �s if r th r c for i n r t n 11 rpo re tt in it purpo .,ul v d f th xpr 1 11 or 1 n d p ct ng for 1 n r 1n nt rn t p r- on 1 ty, o not po r r d th x upon ntan p r on 1 y ur cit z n t r ln. t 0 ld f tr t on of r 11 f r n c n� try" to n for o r in th nt 1 � n b 1 v , n o old, t t th x- r1 r n country , d n th 1 t rovi o o ecti n l 2 of t t on 1 Int r 1 o e, re era to a o rn nt of h t or r al u h not t rn tl r t n 609
"'I~ I - C. T�� C E � 332 - 17 - ter tl al 1 � 0 not oae ans er or th ta 1 t g le r& n 1 ro rt e of our not tion .�- or � la allo s I 11 ry th t X It � f or� , not r e nlz. d nt - 1 t p pet t on r to t vis ct on 122 f ur X 0 � th d c on of th r P n nt 1- lector of Int rn l ev nu 1 h r y v r � t out pronounce nt s to co t � � 30, 1957. n 1 � h 1 PP n ' t 610
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 4242 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4242)
- SUNNYPHIL INCORPORATED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9710)
- SERVICE RESOURCES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10503)
- MERIAL PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8370)
- CTA Case No. 323 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 323)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6735)
- HEDCOR SIBULAN, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7974)
- SELLERY PHILS. ENTERPRISES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10049)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.