CTA Case No. 323 (Decision)
-- . �. ... TI � ULU.P.iN �. : � L\X APPEALS lLA Pet t loner. r{\ ) \~1 -~~�- ~� ~... � 323 eapondent. x� - � � - � - � - � � - � -� D II his lt an appeal fr t Ki ion o t Col� lector of Internal evenue ol ln the p titlon r l1a le for the pa~nt of 12.066. � as deficiency anufactured y lt nd r ved fro ts fact ry fro epte r , 1949 to epte r 22, 19 , and of t 5U s of .00 and 300. �� dalnlstratlve� or �co r ise� penaltie � espon ent cla~s that the petition for revle s led yonc:l the atatutory periOd of t !r y ays, n , a su 1n hat it ��� timely filed , the amounts alre y �����sed. nt1one ave been validly t appears that on Dece er � � 1952, respondent saessed against petit oner tbe u of 484,762. 1, 1 e i&ed �� follows1 . 1. ef clency specific tax on � lack ~act� and � ally Double� cigarettes nu� factured nd r moved fro petit er' a factory fr ~uly , 19 9 to ove r 11, 1 ������������������������ 4 6.7 689
� 323 12, 66.00 2. 3. 1, 61. 1 ,9 . 91 L . . . . ......... , 762. 61 T def c ency spec! ic tax on clgaret es un � Ita � 1 to 3 were ������d y v ec;t on 137 of the attonal Inter avenue 0 �J � Xd ~reenta e taxe d sure cr~ � u der nd 186J c n atlng x, un er ctlo ec: � 1 2, petitioner 5 1 0 � � t � ettle xtr - judlclelly� its v olatlons of the avenue de a egulations o. 27 of the epart..nt of nance p yin the of 1 ,ooo. , Ln addition to the au of 4841 762. 61. he caM was t hereafter einvestl ated y t e onference taff f the reau f Internal avenue, upon petition of coun..l for petitioner. fter e tr� in , where n petit oner pr esented ra nd ocu n- tary evidence, a ,metaorandu was ltt d y c~ ns 1 690
-- f nc h t .... t - 691
23 -- ecisio of 0 t dt to r 10, l 5 � th decls!. n w 1c .itted to th oard o I'ax ppeal for � ou ., 1 l 0 &t t d b t � s nt a reply 0 n n � 1 tte.r of r 12, 19 eal11n ntion to h " l t r o t r � 1 3. or co ni nt r er of eoun -1 fo p ti n r Ju y 27, 955 r d 1 693
. c. .., !31 .J . � 323 - 6- v"<lence av n o n pr sentod in re nrd 0 th f l�ng by eoun el i) � t:tt Ol 0 f h $ l~t cr a d tob � A�9!")"" t r CO!'l of the ci i on u da t � � 1 r the f 1 ai 1 has � r, f ct of r r ion wi 1 in I 0 c un l 0 t f u y 21 , � i l tr f ly r 2 , 19 ( X � ) � 1 !J � for rt ~:,) . l fo t t r t Pn 5:> , ncl �hio 11 0 r 2 , 1955. no t h e r .P ( to r 25, 19!:.5) . c:oun .l .r p 1 pon nt t - h c i s o of r 14, ltbout ry f .. ti~m . lt 1 or :r,, nt 1 -.;~6 , r io t .y..o. t� 1 c ou. e r io r o ton of th ....ec.r t y f ln nc � ~ $ � 1 h eh s 1 0 to r h p tit1on 0 r vl it hi ourt n 694 ~f'
� 32-l - 7- ve r 2, 1956. Un er th facts stat d hove , as the p titlon for revi ew f led within 30 days ft r rece pt by pe� t1t!oner of th cle!on f s nt , pur nt .,o ection 11 of pu lie c:t o. 11251 ect!on-7 of ct � ll25 onfer up n t ta ~t e~lustve ppellat jurisdiction o revio y app� l d e1s1ons of th Coll�cto~ oi Int rnal � ee&e nvolvl!n efu d of internal , fee r oth r c r a n- altles 1 at n tt.reto. r oth r tt r ar.lslng r t � tlon 1 Internal or ot er law or p a � in!&tered y reau of Internal vo , ve eone!stently h 1 �d 1 0 ... involv di pu d f lnternol to � rived 695
- - . 32 J n. viou&ly, t e f 1 t 1 ca.. is ta ec sio , l 5 � In that lsi n, his ori 1nal At in a r- gate 2. 61 o nly 12. _is revlMCl ass� nt h 1n f , responcle t coul not r vis t & s 1 xt days r&o the date of .recef.pt y t � fo r f xp a f c � d l1 ' � 1- � pursuan to ec:t of x e.rles of 19 1. t tl t 1 c o of r spondent nClare , t es, th f t c a � t could v ppea1 aponunt to t r f to ne 16, l� 1 $ l!l ct of pu 1 c ct o. 1125) it n thir - d t of cl si n, or th sued for reeo r t hereof a th th ecp1s1t a provl n 0 1 n- rnal evenu � t Mr 1� as valled of y petitioner. Inst ad, it file a re est for reconsideration o t � ftnal decialon resp 696
� 323 - - ') i the elief th t tbe latter still had the p r to reviM or cancel the as��� nt. X..t ua now con- alder th~ effect of a id requast !or reconsider t!on. xecu !v o� .1101 con'!erred upon the ud of T x ppe la xelusive j~ ad!ct on to review y ppeal dec s ons of tbe ollector of nternal .- venue , the Co las onor of Cust s and he various city and provincial arda of sses nt ppea1s. n addition , it as e. owered to review p;oprJo - ctaiona of s 1d t x off e all within s xty days fr the date of 1asi n of a copy of ec~s on. n University of to. T a v. ard of x p eals, o. L-5701. June 23, 19~ , xecut1ve er � waa declar inv lid in so fa.r �� t ourt f !rat I st nca of the :Jur!.sdietlon n � ect on of the ev nue o � (r errln o ct ns or ~� cowry of Internal revenue taxes erroneoualy or ille� ally collect ), t � relt of ita prov alona af- ect the org nlzation nd dainistr�tlve fu 1 � of t � ard aa bel vall � e e act f his ecl - sion recogn &!.ng the all lty o xecuti � 401� relating to the a tn1atrat1ve unc lo s o ard ��� to 1 it the functions of the ard to !� n!atrat!ve appe�ls , review and approval of co~r lse and refund ease�. and ~ proR�12 ~evt.. other d - eislona of the llector of Internal � enue. the o IR!ss1oner of Cust � � and the provincial an c: ty ar � of Asaea nt p eala where the taxpayers concern 697
� 23 - 10 - o p 1. In ca e nvolv ng ntern 1 revenue tau a. taxpayers coul e!t .r � eal to the ar or pay � tax an IU8 f r r c:ov ry n t proper ourt of 1r&t Ins c u er ectio ev nue � In other ird $ t b19 st inistr - �� f F c ttve dy that coul t n ter al r v n � ca - . 9, x� ther y g the y 1 �� pellate powers. ( �a � 1� ) tnt. nat e 1 � 0 of r��� pondent s ot app� l "'p t t r 0 t 0 � It . .rely IOU ht t r tion of s 1 ar copy of h � �- claton. �dvlsin petltloner at said uld f!nal after sixty day ro the ate of r c t y the -.r of at co of t c to � - y� � ectf.o a xecutlv er 1 � in lch reapon nt f rnis copy f c!sio to t e r � p,rov� ��� he ar h v g r to rev � ~ propr!p any decls on of the ollector o I ternal evenue, once a copy of a dec:lsion as en 69 . &f;_
� 323 - ll. - au l.tte t., th Do ~d for nd r tlon 6 of XI uttv d r o. 4 i � , t Coll ctor of Int rn 1 eve ue lo on ovor th c � ft r he oard h fct on ov c � th 1- lector y not nt rto ny r for cons cer - t oa of th d e Th r to no n con errin th o r<! the po r of r v t t- ctor rt :&-e i ltted to or o r, 0- or r sa een s t � to t s nc - tlon nt rf r c b r at v of 1- e 1 wt t n~t on con r d ., pon s r or 0 y. r o� v f n1 the c-.a c ... 0 t t c 1 r x- an tr l y. ( e tlle c ur g o. v. ollect r, 1 C se o. 22 13, .} f the oer do th c se, ft r t xt - d y r od� t d c n the oll c or also co n th I conG - d�r to h e pl d y � not COUI'I 1 t t fro r n s nt, b c u und r t vall it t� ore could p t t x n h r f r lt recove:&-y t p op r ourt of s In t n � University of to. o � IX id hen, t erefore, tne cla!on of reapon ent �t�d t 10 , � 699
� d"t of c n- com�.ng f n 1. n d ~ � If ttoner t 11 .. � t t cs WI t t $0 th t it c ld nt t s d f th c r t c uld h ve app alod to id o rd y lrtu 9 of ExGcutiv o.r r o.4 1� � n c O;)s y 0 s up 1- ecta of sub tting d cic!on of t 0 n- t rnal eve u nrd ofT x rr 1 of 1 rp of t r or not ~ 1 fil d thin t t tutory rio � ~ti 11 f puL11c Act o. 1125 o 1 ~ t the ~ y ver ly y ci lon 1- leetor o �Internal v n 1 uch � 1� ourt thirty d y ct f. here, ho th dec s on of t ered pr or 0 tion of t 1 � - v co - � rued t � 1 lly o a to r it ty verMly a c uch c to p 1 thin th ty ays fr July 2l, 19M, �n th!s Court w s for ally organ! With t appolnt nt of t~o t nd the aclopt!on, 1n the 1nter!ca. f the les f t for r 700
� 32.., � 13 - of p al � Aceo ingly , n p 1 l r th s ft r ul 21 , h d to ~ cals od for ck of jur~ 0� L or Co. v. Coll ct r . c. � � o. 1, pt r � g Co. v. Coli ctor, c. � � 195 ' lpe dj n o. 107, Oc � 1, f on th t t t r p nd ng r quet 8tion ion of th oll e r , th h r o th ch to pp 1 1 �o c � nte th t f o ic � th en 1 of th r st fo �6� . .. tion. ( ti r z v. Col cto � c. � � 3,, , ug. 1, 5 � 0 v. oll ctor, c. � � , t . 27, 19o � anc yeo � , � 'Zl , 1 5 � nv nt on 1. ct r . c.r. � o. 1 v. z v� oll c r , o. :2 1, � 2 � 1 � v. Collector, � � 2 n � 5, 19~7; ..,t. ul's � ospltal � ol ct r, � � � o � 1 � � 1 7 .. stur a uu r nt 1 ctor, o. � ttf 7 01 .
�3 - 14 - f� nn � n of _h t tory porlo , l t 16 t ll tir t od th t ~~ch r qu~ t for r c n� Gid r t on f lud efo~ the cis on ol- 1 ~t r ini. y f 1. cau 0 h ~a t y fi d t r L. 1. u ~r Centr 1 � oll o. 20 , 2 , 1 7J A.t nlo �o � 11 ct r , � � � .. 1 � 0 � 23, l 57. 0) 11 ly. for r c n d t! r 1t 1 cn n 1c lnt an t r 1, d to p 10 (v 279 . lxty a s f yt r fa 1 or con~iderati n d to- ff c f r on t b t ff ct of '"y-d y r1 d fro uly 21, � tho�ity tor c - id r 0 it ci io n y irtu 1 f rd x p tf.'\; Tl {�\Ct th t li not if c f lM C !li or t r for � d ys � l 702
2 t �� � 0 oualy fil d ut of t t ~ rat � gr nt that h re e t for rec r ro. 3 su runnin of the th ty- day ar 1t tn tc 0 1 to this ourt , an h t the ptt.r 0 st rt to .run only fro the d t of r t tion t n1 of satd re est for r on , pet tlo r naverthelea lost ts r1 t p 1. h v!d nee � of recor a ows tha th said r est fo r co ~ider - t!on � den ed 1n th lett r of res ond e er 27, 1955. ( x � 6. ) t i& was received by counsel fo etit oner, t lt pp r that he filed another request o er tion to r ~ . 19~5 ( xh. D) . Assu 1n th t th al f the equest for r con l c iv o the sa dat bat tton f r reconsider tioo �� file on to r 25, no t e s ost and the runntn of the r J>P al c ntlnued to USp4t � cn - lzt r ~. 955 ( il on 1n the lett� respon ent a 1, tly ~� rec� Yed ot u 29 , recorda.} �ne 1 c un une 29. 1 :)6 qu in until (his ap 1 as) 1- nance� es AV b t u peu_5* ha running of he statutory per p~al� ./An a eal to the ecretary of lnance fr the dec s \ 703
DEC :;,I - �2 C.T�� C - 6- of the !lector of nt rn n do not su 5pend d rov d d ect on \ the runn of th 11 o epu 1 c 125. (T ng o � Collector , , 19 7.) Fro. 19 6 to nt f 1 d, petit oner c nsu d or than - quently pe it oner h lo t o pp 1. t n !t e ded to ppe c nd t watt for t 1 tt r �s d c o n t ct to this our , t t o t o th r f - Its rig t to � ju c 1 claion. on qu ntly, t ita etf.o � It c t nd t t t e count t o rc t tlone � 1 tter � is le � on cn r to r , 1 � e r f r on t 6 , 19~6 vi c n 1 for t ecretary o c on of t f raaer. r o v n e c , h i 1 tt r t� 19~ la c:J.~Ot d 704
� ,2 - 17 - I h d v� hat t nt - 0 c r 2:J, 1 y d, h n� r ndent d te 1� c r n ly, b h c nt t ft y h1 co nt 0 t r� � t 1 a � in t p i y y f lc c 12 � � ~0 e Y� 5 ins 1 io � �1 � � 2 � 1 !)7 � � (., A 705
More in CTA Decisions
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6735)
- HEDCOR SIBULAN, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7974)
- SELLERY PHILS. ENTERPRISES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10049)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ESPER R. VARGAS, JR.(CTA Case No. EB 1470)
- R.A. OBEN HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8723)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CARMEN COPPER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2480)
- CTA Case No. 5282 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5282)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CE LUZON GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY, INC (Consolidated with EB 606 )(CTA Case No. EB 604)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.