CTA Case No. 2298 (Decision)
HE!'l'K I.i C OF THt�: PHILIPPI~' 8 COU R T OF 'l:'AX APPEALS QUEZON CITY u. � u .... -. - -- ~ --- . . - -J .... 7 . ,.. ' pl ' h 0 <i 8. $t ;: f ..5' tH''t<,; l' ... i): .. f' ~ 1 1 . in $4, Oi o.n In- .. "' t ..nr � 1 .;.e.. o . ' )l � 10 of" 11.~ � " .3 . vL. "W ~�p 1 a on � f nr ' � . .s e J( bl 1 /
�' ' ,I ., .. 2 .. ' \ 0l t th er .r J �n .31, 19(.;6 1 � f 9 , d ' . J . l , 6 J.. � '(4 . � n. wtthhol in :?r!J .1~ ~h q . ~ .i:OUl.d � &Jl* pl G .roo J . y l 0 ..h ol,l lnt e (3 ) , 1 ( !),. ) �h p - '1(f .. 0 i +- n u r .... j , 1 69. ( 'tt ..... 11 c-'""1.<1 1 � n � .� . '<! .n ~h \J!l. ' l v I. :r 31, l � t" 's 1 c' ' 1 J, 1':' . "J u.n �� t tl 1" or 0 ~ -- h~ ta-l ,t.r�r 'fl' ~ 3 � 6;, . � ... . A +-a t
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.