CTA Case No. 2564 (Decision)
REPURLTC OF THE PHILIPPI \I I 1'.'1 CO : RT OF TAX APPEAL~ QUEZON CITY � ( .L C � :. . � CA~E -v nu � - - ~- - � ~ ~~ � ~- X �' 65 -
J!~ CI ~:ae11 - l; 1f :\ Co.ee 1'fO� (;!;6tt the imposition �:n eo.l1ect1on of se1d cbeo!d.ng oha.r1:ea ., but �te same Wl!la d~nieu 01 �the Collector of Gusto s ,r 111 hi oruer \U.S st :a~.; , 19'13 &rid recei vee; by peti- tior.�r t 24-, l'J/3 . "rills ' '1er or tb t.olleetor 0 r cas tom s ap �ealed y pet t �.nar to rGap ndent Com- ado:is1oner � t Custo. s . On Oc t) s lJP"" l . 'i'he onl 1S$Ue t b1.. 1~es lv - 1mpoJJ t e-m---all-�d--/U- >r colJ..,'!l�(:n.1o 1 ot' c 1ec\,:lr~. ell .by 1fh collection o.r ct.nc � nr. ch � t;.as on 1 ~brio tir~.g, oil f.t�o yet.iticrvJr w�u� oo fo!. pursuant to c stotll ,.,,� o.r '-'l.~:� m rde.1� o. !>.5-69 a..t'li-:t U. v 4- tobi.:tl' .J , l9v~, �bien statest u \ � ) ,\ � tne Cs.IH'l ..;iv ~ s o~l thl4 t.:il.l~ C..l rA �ot.etn l' -with .. t.te 1..1~ 1 ato:r as~itrhel.l there t 1.�ro � th . i:�.nnag ..ment Gverse{ilr .t ..H.t.p D.l..Q. ti b .t't"rpr scnt~t.ives t the a:t.�rast.re ooi1t.... ~c t(lr� ldll <.:0c J:Ute tha am unt ot <Hla ! "bP e a.:r�g.es ~ud .re Ei.l' tb :a:c.rust.r " bill .... he special ~rmit .:..h �ll be vall- atea u;pcm pa.,.wen\ 1ti ,ctVl:lnce o.t' the cor- responui g ~F1eck.in � ctuli':!CS as CtHttputea, 1n cash or in c~r �;�lat.l. c ..eck by U B Ot-JUi:J.r, lraport r � <.:o.t~sir:;ne-.? a :iJ../v1� br"k.er ot the cu.rgo su � ject to :teflillU 1!' 1t is lntEU' ~:r�1- .f'ie<.t 'l:.hat no a<:tual s neckin~ ~el'Viccs h~ o,..~an ren~erad. .,..Ll pa.~ments � � �uvat ca stu. .l.l be re-ceive bi t he ~.. .1� .:r de if 1:.1 e .1'o:r ~ I.U;: h .4.H.U..l)O.dte \; l-ha Gt!ief , ,, a -{I .Ui \~ i;:;lcn, 1 ':iU vf i"ie. aJ. Hoc .ipt � �u.all be lt.aueu 1 Ol' sue 1 ~Rta,)'m~lClt to b~ .CJ:�ea.i t ~ to the .P.;;n�t 110:r1�s rUl'tt... . l~ �;opy c,,t' the fh tl.oi.a l HeceiJrt unu. a tn t.::Cfl.f .~r J,r.l'fl tz�� ~. l l t:.tw .L ;a �.:o.t.�w;ax�aell bj' tha ""'�tith .J1vJ..don to the lnterJ...al , udit " 66
Hf2.HCE.it'\..HTH UO ;vNltt ,C'iOh' ' C "''-'~-r��& SElWld:::::~ U'l f 1 'l~?.Et.~ . u a ri~:r .. y uec '1 n '3 2 t t ~ Tat�iff atld CU'S.to,. ' en c Ci.11's .,;.llv s \;!l t l b:rico... 1~.. o.tl 1~ w tl out m~:r.1 t. / ea:vt as no rt.r ctor, c.n he c J:�g.o .1 rr $ re � �
!Ji:C L~~ I '"'l" ... Ct A C.a$e lie "' 2!,tblt luw 1tUft .~ oi l cotls1" C~tL\BD.t' U W l l tif1.tttlll:h an hl'11 � lt �e ;: 1: tc(tCCSS � G!*.;' p.ru.c~ 'iil\1! � Apparal~t..l.J , tb<G p.r p � \ 1 � L o ' ttl a-~ ~.u1 � p~u.~ t 1 :wafl� ar:~ l'~.t� . oa � t.' t ~ t:OtWU.tiOC an , ttl Cu.~�t.o~a~ -~~o ~~cler ebtJr~& .1 :t-eq .r;ell oote>.<t�~t , b1j} 14�:, ;p&17'i .1 t J.,s. 1� ;ii,.Ue~ � u, 11 t � r'~ . cnr ., ~~tu~t i'l' 1 � tr v �~ l ~ .tr.tv \ C~~IJi}~J/ b.i!:o-� � b� tf:~e tr~r �i.tt ~~~lt.:Lt1~n~r w~.raQd t,b~ '\E~.f.U~~l /C�1: �tb'S loHtl'J~$11!1 ~:t �~l~Gk'-~ t.tl$ qa4;~tJ.t_v tJ.i '~bill CIU"'~O ~ to 1 t .rli1l:J..r:.a i t t';he lubJ�:1~at.l't1 oil ���u hired by Far t . t. f)~r : ~t~t , ' J:.\d t\icftin it wCt s me JiiUJ."ttd when ttl.l'ca .Y at t.be j' 6.8
l;bl-J., 1 1.1 � I! 61t t,;. -, <,; I 1 -1.-; , a t fll ~.~.; b 1" � 1i al.l tlu t..i) bat ti- t 0 r � ... yo. wer. .r n h.� j !} .e lw l'iC 11, n tt r l te O.m ... rt t the i'o.re..;. i 8 .Sf.tl v � 'l'iJ. :l.Utl' oil ' a t en lira l port he t1...r....r, ~l ho 1" 1. l s tt n r 0 Ul prQ �� rt w.�tr.1. . th ti a J.. a hen ttl a � v ees b the vtl""tv 1,;er 0 �. 'utl " .n .).; .. � .. � t riv~ at. h eor� 0 ni pp ll1 su.r t ...i� . re c t...a~ t � h. nly th t tba c.t o �� Cus 'iii o nt t t e a $ . ~ . uvan ~ �l �fl Ji ' �a, t, �U i1 re- r" t l lt 0 in l 't:bs findings til n .� et io .iJ � In �ne c . J . t. l . � � o l auo �� Js � , l c �
� ... " j' t 1 .i t. e t,:U e � \11- 1 1 , 70
... .. � l ' -'l . r(J. � t ., ~� -:::., ( �
More in CTA Decisions
- JLJ PROPERTIES, INC. Represented by AILEEN G. HERRERA v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6161)
- ROY M. GARCHITORENA vs. HON. ISIDRO S. LAPE?A, in his capacity as COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 9972)
- CTA Case No. 3063 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3063)
- CTA Case No. 1578 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1578)
- BELLE CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6156)
- MARUBENI PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6514)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CHEVRON HOLDINGS, INC. [Formerly Caltex (Asia) Limited](CTA Case No. EB 1143)
- RESTORED ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9958)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.