CTA Case No. 1455 (Decision)
~~PUBLIC OP TBE :PHILIPPINh& ~�OUR'J' OF TAX APPE:A.L8 QUEZON OITY 11;? 1731 ----\. - -�.. ...... ..... ~ F C I .... ~ion r th ~; to s (. 17"'1) s d c; '\i c: ly. � �.n ~s t d to � , ,; s Cour 1. n~ 1 1 c1 d i t on~r 1z ~ do CO.t'.f.:' .. (~ �--� 01'. n- d tr!dR!' t,r!( .y "L t as h 1., � l th .r in ( 195 1, 5: ) :l 'I& ( f'i,J~,g . OS~ 'e''. 1.01. cf 8 i.v �ion '' ... 1 l:tQ I !")' 1 .e . lo ~ bv o� 1 t0 ~h .r v!d. lfJll t . ' to t -lt . ~' H� ,t (:' .., 1 f 270
...' 'J e-IOJ - .nthority G' C f1 .:; t:OS. 1455 ~ 1731 2 � t 1 '�.e in 1ona 1. ' t , wor~ . ) for hf: c tnc on of h{' Wh. : x� m t.;.- ,.. 0~~ .. :0 l, t. () lt ~f th<! (.t, tr 't: fr: ~~s n-''�t tr .. /r(')�"i k (� 1 t i " :! 1 P. 11 by t, .;h V OV'1 . s"'ss~;;d ~ti io.er in the ...27l
~J � tr 1 r- , c~ - ' 7.� 6 r rr t Yl� �f"ci c u da o1 t b c� j 2 h c h on . -r- :3. ) � tt ':" n 1 ,-5(1 for h 272
n � '=lSli} 1 - (H -� CA.:~""'H "i � 14 5'5 &� 1?31 oonstruc� 1fln or bolC culv .rta and r1p...r p hl.'!ladwlls in the subdlvi� s1on or ~ 1 on r is an .llowable d d ct1-on s en o. dinary :;, , nee ~ $ary bus1n ss s)trcn � '1 th �c,ard to the first if.ls , JJ tit .on r a mat te;r of good ecoo 'nti r. ., Q.ct1c f 1 trEat~d h a ount of f 1, 914 "' 98 .?.f?, c .�87 re-p � .nt1n . p r �a or thf'l o al m;.;t.ult ot 33 �,, '( ~l6.t. 0 ~dv~nc('jd by t t to .'II\ � ' th fer e ' �ub 1v1sJon �n 1956 a.d 1959, r - ~ct:J Vf.!l, , as P8 t cf thA coetc of tta~ l<lt.., 1 t xp .,nfl1 ) ntt tn r~rore t�~x. ! t furt net' �tv~.r r~d to e ther is an i "~tH. c:~t1cr. that h ar�1otmt. of 338,7 h).f:O �hich was ~vaneed by th~ latter to t.hn for .r woJld never bP- fully rf!�un ~ w.ith1n h corporate e-.. it- tit'!"' of p t.i joner . "f'!'t1t1.oner ... tat d h(1 ,v ry as � tt.~r 11eom It f ! 1ts we ..e tax return � On th o .er � a d, rnsoond . ,t o1atm~ th t t er cons rt1et1 n o!' thP. a "rworl� s ~~tG'm is not a <t: ;dt, 1 exr nd1.tnre a co-nt'"'mplet~o u.n. r "' otlon 1~J; f ttl l.noome ~ X . .gulations (. t V�:l"lle h {;r<la� 273
t as o~ 2), t'b p r-t � , nt pO!"tlen of , l�rb tJ ote h r dert It :points o~t abov ... cited rtH~ula to implies th.Jlt tb . :ex~ellse �or th etten.. at 01" 1m-prove , ntEr on tke )f' pnrt, tll stt ta ton 1 t �� e ,ttc t hal', Wh' :Ad!.: t t or <lwn� thtt waterwt)r!UJ .yet . .� Suob :a~ ses, th r~f'ot'e, ould not be eo s1d r � .1 �. eep1't � 1 expe :S:tn e t p t:itJ.on r. I�. � eo tttt'fllS$tU~ 'that the a . nnt cl.l!l:l. ed ar rtot or4in I!Y nd � �":. as rtN to tb -.if\ :~.uA bV tb � ltlon r to be re:tmbur d from ter t ~it$ aed w ter tf.;r r ut&l cell ct1on � �1 � liett Jl$t1t1oner� a &tan o b ell t~tt � � Alth ;b th r is no 3urts.p*"udene yet on thin qQe tton t o ~u~1sd1ot1o an bts ~s is
6 of /~ � 1 her , f 'a . � ( 1 t 1 - 0 ~78
7 276
. tion at T Cou.t"� rul ., ln t t al . oot~ .n td ng t � ot o .hts c nc~ e1J.1 g t p1 T ~ol , th~ e :r- p ~ t" . cos t V!\ iOt.S e � For
o or 1�.;. y r t of o pl 1 n ot t rlin .a er eo. 11n1 r to h r of"ation ba$ . L 0 ld s � ot t r to t te u' �n an a :1 o � t tot � rpor J. � f.nr h ltnnin Q t � Th e :rpo at1o di.d not hold title to tne t ili� �1 In or ng � heir un ro o or tio � t rlt hou . s rol , \ilbieb tt�catme!) h r~~pond t 1n th t, i. 01'1l'1 � t �in r vor r.. , t ~ion h~lc. the � by ,h ~ orat1 n to t tet 0- h~ em� or tlon 7 ol � 278
10 279
11 1 n th o to th OtL e t bar s th , e tt ublio uti ti to provia, .rv po 1t.. �!J cost ot lot sol �, to't' th r.urpq of cl. rrdnirt'"' in o oe on ~al .. of r. 1 & ta e lot nd 1 tc, t nth �tilt 1 .s .. 1<1 h1 ~c1~, 1nelud d tne " r 1 nt 1�. eo:r , h . 1t~t ict Cm1rt ha . . th c u tin t is co c � Th .:1 t:rSe t't.,t I' �1 .d () l � 280
1 l :r '� o., ( �?1)) '~ ll w T 1" l e. � nr 68 11 (? Jo.l 1 td r~ Q 'M r r:u1 -~ t r'f t ub t r r ta � - un 0 ~7 , �1 . o () 0 ti .y ... r t t
� t1 $!' 1. 1 ry n 282
� 17~1 r 1 tH:i ]OWP- t 1~- r1~J1l�;ctton o' th~t� . 2~. rJ � h r.:~hich p tt- ) j 0:1'?. i\ th. � t} i s l!ii : ~ J. ,. .d 0 f 1 , {)} t rr c on h ~ �ot ,Cine ~bl � 0 f �r(!! of f; tj ...
~� 1 r . '!'' \ 1 .G , 0l of n n , 1 w::' eo . ,1t ' .o hi t �- t 1 � '1 t rt
More in CTA Decisions
- CITY OF MANILA AND RIZAL DEL ROSARIO IN HIS CAPACITY AS OIC-CITY TREASURER OF MANILA v. SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1869)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL AB (formerly known as SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL AB)(CTA Case No. EB 1534)
- UNION CEMENT HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. THE CITY OF TAGUIG AND ATTY. J. VOLTAIRE L. ENRIQUEZ, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF TAGUIG(CTA Case No. AC-354)
- CTA Case No. 3805 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3805)
- FORT BONIFACIO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and REVENUE DISTRICT OFFICER, REVENUE DISTRICT NO. 44, TAGUIG & PATEROS, BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5926)
- FAMILY MEDICARE SERVICES INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6453)
- SOUTHERN ENERGY QUEZON, INC. [formerly HOPEWELL POWER (PHILS.) CORPORATION] v. CIR (Consolidated with Case No. 5984)(CTA Case No. 5933)
- CTA Case No. 3746 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3746)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.