CTA Case No. 1790 (Decision)
\ OF TflE PHILlPPTN � CU t l' U.F TAX APPEAI,JI QtJEZON ClTI � � - - - ..... - ... � p - 0 r- 7 1. 1 2 0 o� 3, � '' ' c 0. (
. �.~. l? '.;u �~ ' .1 ... /'j\. al t on or- r, a -J tc: .p. t �~ � ...... '�.I . � :'I ' 1 I I.,, l- (f t.ui � rvlc t.tL. ap ovz: l ct' <:'liti t>c-ti ti ~r;, o ~r tton of i ..~ elect ' ~- 1 �\ ,\ � 1.0 n 16 5
l79:J 3 i tl r .r for t U_L � ct on ~5~ vf t on- 0 ')�'w tX p � tio �r 1� ' Ci51Ci1 0-l �- e ,, - . :o- c . J-l":.C . , V � � .. . ;r. 1� t1 � io1 -r 1:' - nt co~ - not tO' t. i vO rt 1 l 6 ,, �h t""x n {~\ e~ t.ior o n e'SJ.J.t>ip t ion uncl r .\l e ! ....e .,o ,tc..,... T ~ ~c �L~n ' r.>."' u ad ' ! ' :J l''p�.)�,;. ' ."t i..!> r;z~ ly� of J1.dy '. ;. 166
4 t ,. j 4 ' l �. �o, t .,..�. 1. ... 1, . . . .... . .. .. .. . .. , . ~- ., r. ' � :; { � .. ... . ... ...'~t�, ' . .! . .. . ,. "' . .. ...."' ....... . ...... ... ..* � � t � 4 � � � � � � � � � " .. ,) t . r�~ ' -.. I I"' ',, � . ll... - ci (".. ' 0 oll ! 167
-- .woO � ' 't.'''; ; r 1~" e t o \.1 j � : ' J;J r 111 s� 0 of. fo o�sr; !' 1 6 8
I ' � � ' rc .. � �* Q; r 169
;� 17 0
\ 1 p n tr � d.Qet it. th~ tl o., 1 � li <li t - '1;;.1 , U. R. .. +2!J, .l >r l 3 1 ,.. 0c .' l . v. v. , � of I t . t � ....;(~ ~0 0 ~ , c ri ... . ! ,.. . " ot l' I; .t l t �� � � � ~2' l,. l J� ., 1967; �'� c .. .. :l Co l . f In � v., c �- ' � , .; g f{"" � ,l.. ~~",36'1 ..... int 171
. l .ll "~~ ... OT.' C� .; ,;o. 1 � t 41. � 1 !--} ~) /N
l'i�'O J ' n~ so "x :..rc .. e c l ~� 1 fl 3
-. ll 0 i on
2 t.. c Io ., , :tranc 1 !J 0;. t tt th .f.foet th t they r� lit:.. ) .;ot J: s t t .r , ~ e .I.(,;. c t _o th 18, � cb 1 y, .I . ui:'. () t Q .t t ' , ... tl .. t. I , ( � ,t.:i.ClO tt""'*t 'iii! l 'iOner'J. .t"OG rec 1-... ~s t:roru l r .� ~ JO , 19 v 21!"' ... 3i t o, t; l .. l (" vn � .1. J. 9, ' .. � 1.~ ,. ) Q}-_Pl. ' ;. l.oLrie lie �~t ,. ]J. ._o e -b n:- t 175
.l s .l.u . . . .e l' 1.: �~)1 ap !'{ V''il () 1ts n"'W j r�� .c 1 ..:: ��~ . . St:t J'~ ,'1'-~ i'~ .. t,,;. no .�' t �. i'< JL :..t ~ c t.r � .t.. ,;.ln a it o 0 resia.~ .t of J....... J lli t � ..iJ. t . . . r .... l.t ~� ' , \ ~- t.i J.lO n,~., ctu..:. E. �� ~- -:...tt>:.l �G .3 ~.tto , [� � 1 r c. - �,~; . l::t s... "' .�:) ' '., L.~ , 1 �1M -~- ISH: �' ti tt ' ti L c 1. ~-� .;t... ": t �<?: ti- CO::'l..d tionc , .s
� I l ' � lt r- and b i. r .fi tio r 01. c u fl"O J p t!t1ot'lel" t a t n 1 ;, or �� v th pel ffir it on r 1 , tb. c tor r npa 1�l- e 1t r bi � � u �'J n or 17.--11 � 02 p .rcenta �.~ "' xes 177 ,
'v oJ n ( it co t Ci J t . J I t 178 \
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.