CTA Case No. 2289 (Decision)
REPHRf,fC OF THE PHILIPPiN ES C<!IIRT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY ..'. \~ Lh i.IIJ~ ..... ' LT!J ., �'I . Jl . 0 'I.J� '� { o�, ... ' ~ t1tior l ;,/~' ~~-( ~.r.~. v l - - - - - ... ... .... - ... ..�.. v � 'I~ " ' j. ;;:. ' a ~~ t tic l J.. t �X. t (h~t:ll. Q co .1. lilt 'lor p t h~; cale � r r <1e � � a:r 'I J.., iJ.'J r 1.: p J.')J � Ct 'l� r�t f t ,, c _l; l:nc�� ~ l 0 ., t. , l Vi t ' rio 10J � y �: .. e l. e t-~. "" ' � .~,� � 31 .l cvrj.. r .;~ 5,11 Ol t '-C! .il' ..... I0 - ' 3~ I1 1.' jp t s, .
.. l 1 1 r t'l iv .inst pet1 t1or� �r (.) t )'. in t.ne 4 unt. , i'l . l ' inelusiv ' ' t int r t , n M!i c 19 petition r ru 1 0 ..s r tJ..u vf '{..~ t. n ch 51, 'l..)( l., re IJ d ~t \.l ni t tt.l. st r- cni tiu � 1 r ol~ in ni . c se y;' tb t H'! uf h..: COl '?0 ' t Vi<l u 1 r ct � .~.,..�'+.';-) l , <.> Il 21+ ., l ~0 l ppl;y t "' l i Ou " r o~er 6 lllll 1 J � l9 e, II Cwnt �t.ile ' ' .i"rw J a.ry l9o~, cront l �a ttl � l vs . Co ' j. t l l ~ u "1;� CT Ca s o. 42 3, st l'l, 97j,l it 'wa:.. l ld tn t. in t n ~ who:;.(~~ ,.tl ... 1 u is "h. . .r e~ w C'J:j) pr iae 1 "' f' t .Pll l c , � )lfJ ) tli<:' ts in e f: ' 9 ~ v wo 'ectio. l iu -t 1 9� :~ 61
- c~: c. x' � .;;.'. 'iJ.'j li i3 1 t l Ut ov1... ns of ~ai ct. u . t l t c 1or ar 1t.1 a! r thir y, nin �I Tte J.~ . 1' e + c c.vr �o- ti~.~r.., U" ry l, y l, � er � ti t. on r 1 a t ') s.Cl r tc t t J\A. � fl' 1 e y � ~ " � ll i ' rc ...-�lt .i~ J � Li , -r (~--?~#~J:_ -- u R� 62
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.