CTA Case No. 137 (Decision)

" , ' l X� � � � � � � � � l 1 l J � 17 T d ei �1 t 1- f 11 of iff Act o � 11 �� 0 - � t 0 � �0 n -c ( �f �1 hr � ic i t le fl c � ... 303 y 1 XC s .

c.t J. 7 .. - � Co 0 ). h. ' � �...1. r:u � 1 e X ( f � � � � f c 1- f� .. vin r:o 'lf ~, ... "' no Cu ~ i �� � u. t . ' '{~�� t to rl h" t. ti on 0 c !� 304

\l:lt� ) d ). . J 1 I I ,, t s in l in t~ _ a t'he i l~.. ort_ t$h 1 f i t p.ro , cis � t b f t opinian t l t t � .a t .. tr . ~ ticn .X X Kfl' a Tt i f pre-vi J,.() c la t th Com.:w . vi ei i t 0 I'll p:r t 1 d.U. y fo i� if - $ n � t � ( he nt� n fo~ 0 r hr YP qc / aph 2(e a n lo� � u p r { 0 tv . � u ~- BTl\.1 y rat of � 0 , e.t 100 i l s � ct 2('"} ( '� � �t. T iff "# X � L 1, 0 i 1 o ro. 1o X 305

- ., - .... � i (~ 0 �) fo n '( j ~th d 0 Yt . ic 0 0 c � i: 306 '

7 ng 1 .... n cct X tJ. ... i S"'tO\. f tr . � ,V ~ u v' �� � l tj () f ~ t t � D .( et.. ( .r - � I 307