CTA Case No. 499 (Decision)
� U!'JLIC WUH - - � 366
- � 99 1 ic 0 , ( .. Jl -C 'IJ h . r., 0� h r 0 � ll t (, 0 .. 1 ... ) 0 � c: 1 ( 57, I .r i ~ l'l t. (.1 h p d i t t ... . H1 .n '~ 7, ,. ) t :. 3� .;, ~ ,. t r. � ll ... 1 'h t L. 1 . l nr 0 � t � �l Co . I� t 367
- � lr9 -- th ri 0 t et ro 1l r 1 or c () (,i 0 .IJ .. 1 � .... I� l:~5� ' .r .. r 0 nt ale � � � 183- 1 ' .'c � 0 c. ) ' r I r er r 1r t n .� ' h t , J 0 ' h - � ;L ... t t 368
vr ou dl 1 r1 0 t 0 or 0 0 l d ly t h y-fo r (2 ) l ly l lvi nl p �( ' 3, p . "~"' - .) 0 0 th 1coi1. ~ l .t ' 0' 1 e t p 369
l l �� l 9 .. ' t - - 5' l l drums, cl fie; ot tI 1J it li ... I r by 0 t tc - 0- .. r " t iJ. r '370
371
� c n 7 (, .. t ' r t t ~ tr u.r !' 'ti t : i .. (I ( ' � 3 .I .) p c t c r ..,.. ,. 372
� 49 - r w t ..., J: c..~. (24) ;;LI) la n 1 -f t � n 0 t 1 0 offi e 0 l ' r, v ... n 1 1. cl , e 00 .. ry ion i' 37 3
� i t � ' � t ( - 1 37 � a c. 0 r 1 1 �o t � � t ... () :: 37 4
� -- ; t � ti t 0 i roo t t t - . � 7- ' .) ... � l' t ' his a t �- ll t t b ot 1� po n ' 375
� 99 (, i ~r: � ' , - - l t 't t 0c 1t c 0 p c 0 ll. t 0 h or 1 1 0 �I �l . � � ) In 1 h i- J. i ... to t I! t e @ r0 ' t n. 1.1 h h. u 1. ip t h 0 i: t r. c t. en .l- ' - t0 � J: t h t O't� t ��� ) th rt u ohol ( � 4. '"U ..,t 0 changed liands, some unsbrtlPlflO~ � 'b'M"si'd rs t 376
- 1- .. 1r .1. ~ u- J. 0 c- ory n 1 - 1 .. l�l l l' . 0 . .) o.. ne u 0 �( 377
' b nt c 0 0 le t t t �c 0 f '� c a- T } io i l � 0 r u o~ r tl 7 ?. � t 0 t . .n. 1 n 0 h n t- � .) . ' p nr ti � 0 0 0 .- ,. 378
1: � I or 1 j t { ' 1 h t _... ) t c n - .. 379
� o. r li ly t u t, t r' 1 ' w i:tJ 0 c o. ns, h 0 rr 0 t u � ., � l tt I' ' � � 6, 'l _,. .. � \ 380
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.