CTA Case No. 2144 (Decision)

REPU!h,JC OF THP. PHlLIPPt.'lll.._,~; COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY � - ' (!. .. � - - - ---~-- -- -� ~ - t ,. oi 1o r r �- ._, n - c - 1 1 n1 A �� - h 5 ~ r r :t t l - A~ t ~h r- � st c. � "" �h 1 .t ' 9

- -- �i.'CI %0; � � 21 C~ � � � I!A . - 2- etrtk~rs, ot Co PO J'l"' t g 1. 27, l< 9, ~ thout p oper a 1 L witt u .an teste c go of 3 ct.n. OQ<r~o ... ~� ue ~ loa ,8 ..t .. �S. s II - 0 ,H.I' 'fl, 96 � A cor~- t is -4 /6 nr. ..l:t.?S/69 > 11 fl t sai~ ess 1 l eo yi c. Sine... t ., 08 $ 1 t a sl u . " - Jo r+l he-.t t � .� ,. ~ a J 1 +: c to w r eo by th .t>l. OtO � f cu~t s vho f'O!l th l ve :~ s liable r vtol tio. Gf ot on 10 4; ot ?h � 1ff' & Cust 0 �� ti pea � t +-h o, 12, 1970, 16 p t ,to rn .. 10 '

~) 0 - .:J/ t t1t1 tn+a not s bj e t b au e t: h 11 t�e . ..a.. �n o: f w . rk. h. e in . pas A +- � i ti o +" a pr s1ons or ce 1o l '' ! t. Co�" � ourt h t17 b. 1 4 h t - s e ttteA 1n g~J h ... � " rel r 11 bi ..,. . io 2521 f � .t

o. 21 -- t. 1 � � ' ;, 9 � .; , 12