CTA Case No. 570 (Decision)
. ~ -� . . ~r..;~� . GOU.t"T o~� l.t\.A AP~~ NAND4 . X� � � � � � � � � � � � � � X !hia l.S n ction fil b t.h . h� refund of tht lJ of ~t.t . o. :<69. ,. plus s1.x ( (i :} per ce .t .1nt&J: s+ � whic h 11 p l" of th ., 28' 1 194. alleQadly illel.Jt lly and t:t;ron 04 lr eoll cterl v r .s� " t�x f � th y ~ 1955. Th ~t!tlt�nt.r$. are hua;.}and an wife . Amel:'tcan PetttionJ u . 1, . sw � pp�. 1 ~ ~1 . C . r � } , a e� tn r1v1n all tr � ~n~~~ from Pb1l!p~tn cure s . r\.l etty ?t1 , l fit.j , p ,tition rti fil-t � t~ .. ir 1955 1Lcom.e t x rt u:rn . r po.rtt,o~ ~ 9l!'Oss inco of . 1, 77l , l,t';! � . nd net inc � Pi 1 lo � ar. 1 , n w~r; .! h � . :z. lll c. }. April 19, 19~6 , p1!'tltit)n �r . .!led , am_nQed inc t x rei: rn , r t'1porting the s e ~~:eo s 1ncom~ ~:rf . ~ les-s. r net it .'.."' ~. 5 - � l . ( �. xh - ec.) 496
: - t �r t II ii 'Jf � { ... � } .........�.. . . 8 ., 1 � 10 ( u r. .. ....J . ..�..�.r.��.. 1 � ����� � �� ������ uc. J..... (.,L '. 1 n il i .t � X �\1 ' � � t� � z I i tJ , 1 ;~� � � l:J o. fl d ."L' t: 0 n o. c l I, � r lo n .... * ... t' F J ....�, ; t . n.' � ... ":'~ 1; ' '1 f!l c l), ~ ! .- .lC vc { .' ,,r � r. ;;- ?71 r1 .ur �� i () � p 19 f � .~ . 497
- o. 10 "" ol ir p J.t ~. � ..""~li.!f'\O'ncy ~., ...,.,....._-""'__t . t � � � lr�ct r o I.nteru alt ' t . 11 tbtt at � nal Ctty _� .rtk f Tot 1 In re '*tti � t ot Int r. al �� e � � tt~ petition r .tnc ::1:� xch--irwe '' � k c ha~g.e to lliJ1~ 1' 4. 143. 91. l'h � ir tteati th n1liPPi ... IJ. 41� ed�ral ax 1th1n oy paid, } p t1tion� l:'St 9U&t 11, 190 � :a �n d vh lJ.p p n , 1: ..,._ ~ f<:xr l95a, cla _in th follG 1n c1 (l} u. s. �de nco tiLl . $ ����������...._���� j 47l , d -------.. .lllt~re ~-----4---.--J----- ~ 2) t t-o J:l.l. d up ? to av le. 19~5- �~���� � (3) .,xch.enge nd b�n� c.a.cyt �������������� � --.. ................ t
� 4- �h jt � . t th.. 1 .: 1 . .. uc to ................. ?.9 ) � r- I) ���������������� t1 ����������������� �1 Ls () . . - ... ~ 7� ,l � 1 �tt '9 9
�- CA~- t' O. 570 -. pro - 1 x mp 1 n ������� ������� ou - 0 ! J: .,.. . .. . . .................. . . . . . . 41! ' � � ' 7 , su It' ) � � -��� " �� nt .r fMnd o et ��� .�� �� , ��������� � �� .t t. e _ 1� olvtng ot' d ~Jctib!l1ty or non- e uc I 1l _t ft not pres� + in sh 11 limit t OUt'$~ ~f-6 I �th qu~ ttGn . in� c � XI) � '1- th .. .et. tion t a d !r'lt~:t'f' $ +h .r!'on for +.h~ ~ 1'1:'{ ~ 1 19 2, !9 3 n f ~ -4-t.:on �-. {c) (1) { � ) o hl ~t1on"" l 1 te n�l - e p ovi-d s in It ( ) a es aid o ~ c u d r , e ~ept � 500 �
l tt.uc ye:r. to .b � he ~ authority oi ;: for: i ~n fGt.tntry m w.tt 1n t - t xa l y~ - f. J 1 tht ~� . .m1 t d tha.t e petit . n r ~ a1 ~ v. s. t 't y flt� of c.r dit fo:s: the inc ~ ount of 41l, S67.� J,~ paid at u.~. ieduaJ. i � e tax��� J . ut t .re � ~--1-d.t~ 1t t d � t � t t.o me 1. ta� � du.ctlon undttt s. .t1oi: J (. o� the rax coa.. t. tttf.on � u1u trAy r � �nti l � to t . and tl � t un �te t1 _ 30 {o) (S) (u, , (c) (<4) (A). - \}>). and c) \ ) ~ (7) o tt. � C e . 19}y. a.tnce the tt to rt' 501
� � n ��� � � 502
c 1 ly 1s, vX 1� �� � - on tt.r c - � " � 1' 1 n ). 1 ( v" �j 0 tt j;: ' r - �1 � n . 1 l} v. .� � d f. � � � o. 1.� 1 1 � � � l )J 5�03
ion .r pr . or tn ,: �vm at of in er�� a b. legal rate { ' ,} tlie lL _, t of � 15.' .� _� Tt 2 '(c} , _l l69 41ft i :'~' tu l. vl. ne ct. � h . 1a a publi� �tt�~;vW>it , :~; fu s~~ w n 6 "' 1 ct~ , 0\l Jttst cautt , to p....rf ;c h1.$ of-f1.C1~1 fth ~tL � fh ettl to" er � �t i>llny ~ho � iii � t i dd ~ y W1: , � ently ct ..ct �<i <lC 11 oll. tt el 1m - IiU . , h t petitJ..one.:ca' right t t llt J.t Q t loil�o, .- . R. c y ~, . l ~91- llu... or V$. J� h'\�� �t �~� � , .. � o. l 1 l7S, u u t � � H U:n le t �
;c.," - 10 � mle�lonar .~� t� ~'"' .0 GO :- tern�l n 1cky the mount. of 'if l::.o. ' 9 . 00. ~ t h'!!)J al s ~c �� 0� �� � 1'~ � ' tJl 11 Dee 505
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 1161 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1161)
- SYDENHAM LABORATORIES,INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7416)
- WATSONS PERSONAL CARE STORES (PHILIPPINES), INC. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10274)
- LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5461)
- PHILMAY PROPERTY, INCORPORATED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8764)
- LANCASTER PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6753)
- CTA Case No. 518 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 518)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SEMIRARA MINING CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 793)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.