[ G. R. No. 39926. July 13, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39926. July 13, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39926
[ G. R. No. 39926. July 13, 1934 ]
SMITH, BELL & COMPANY, LTD., APPLICANT AND APPELLANT, VS. MATILDE MENDONES ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of __________April_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from the __________the appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.