CTA Case No. 1919 (Decision)
'lf:,.UftUC OP' TllE PHILIPPINI:<'.Il� COURT Oli' TAX APPE.A.Li QUEZON �11'1' . .. ' ( � ~ 1. ... - �� . . . . � � � � � ..- . ts ' 0 1 . )�;t �. 0 X' 32
� . � � � � � " ..., 4 �� �� � � � � � '' 33
� 1 .o �h ' 1 ot:or� r r ' t lt� 34
.... � � 1 tn t ', 1 or aXf'is 1 ( 1 35 �
o. , ., '' r .) 1 � t i t �
; o- ?. j3 -.7 c tt- ~�JI)O!"l�t8 t *a .? .. t: 1 ' t rv 5 ~ t r.~ �37
� 1 t9 � t�t'" ,l it 1 .... ' h .ir.l .. c.. at t n al�c ax r r.ns r 38
� J - , . j � ' ) �- ~~ ;� 3 9
' .. .� 1 :1 (.F'.' ' X � , ... fl p I') 1 t 0 0 . ' 1 � � I r. c;f ..
/ .... 1 �� ... .' SF co�- t I 0 p I> 41
we u - �- l t1 42
, �1 r - � 0 r i r '�~ ' 4 3
� If 1 . 1 ... � ' 2 t -/ �-- -�- .. !~ 4 !l
.. 1 ( tt; - .... .
9 1 th 0 2,.. . :; ' i~ ,. 4 6
- � 1 1~ 1 c1 � y 1. c t 0 S � ot;) .. � .I i' ,, 4 7
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.