CTA Case No. 3960 (Resolution)
t'J-() LW. 0.,. ;}if: "'t"IU!"t'l!'llr9 ~OUR r OP TAX ~f't'�Al-CJ QIJftON 0 '"" 0 CHE c TR � 1 c �� Pe 1t1 er. - - v reus C . T . A. CASE o. 3960 0 1T � -- - � -- -- - -- X ent. � �- X ., LU l 0 u t. 1 w Pet1t1 n ion r o � ��� c 1 t. f11 d iciency July 17, 19 7 n h I' th t t sp 1 1 � d v or nd. f i x d t xe inv ved h r in h d lr y b tl .~ thr u h c o ro is ur nt to X tive r � 44 with p tit1oner y a nt. 1, 5, 7 .ot, nd h r 1ng on t p of r nt, hi 1 er u. ,. c:c 1 p ion or r vi w d is c: con 1d r cl ed nd t � s 0 o. � z n Ci y, nil 4 Jul 29, 19 7 . ~~ re idi Ju � '-- 22o
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.