CTA Case No. 1003 (Decision)
1 ,. - TT"RT.TC OF Til<: PHIT . TP PlN F ~ i:.: A u.; T ( I(.., l 'X ~ Uh ,t,Q .....Il Y llS - c� � � c �l 0. --- -- - -- -- - ---- /l l � e t ot' � . l� tt� � 1- io r 1 ' t t br � 92 1 0l � o� �l � � 'I i ' � 77 a - 75 � 2 t 1 7 � 76 . i n 0 � t t tn �0 �� 0 ri t 100
c�- CI I �1 - 2- 1o r !11 1 � ro e t a of C 0 a 1 � ion tl e uen 0 ,. o tor � ye h Col eeto 0 t 1�0 8 or. r t 'n ti 10 ,.. t� r � 'p 1 � w1 h � 0 e nu l1 r . � l l 0� c � � 0 or t � e ru (, t� 1� � ot � ol � u f t h 1 h 0� it la1 t 0 � tl 0 1 � 0t � t ce � re 1 08 rt � � � or 1 � <1 � efu � ti r � r� � co 1 � 1 er � ti r � , l9 l, l� u Ia ' 1 1 n or r 1 e nr ,. 1 01_
C! I . s- C �l -- 1 e en or he 1 1 1 tlo � c . t ) �- � -: 0 ') _j_ -
DEClSIO I� C ' C SE o. 1003 un ... . p r � ~ c, h 76.01 of the 'r r1tt � . d cu~tom.-St � �� on J - u .r 22, 196~� J:' po d.ent d i e t t l.ess the .r- ~uiroo o :rt1t1c~ -~lon ~tt u 1n1 .�� rt~._ph 76 . Ol o t.b -r rift Cod ub its a for r t d t on-cctnp ~nee w1 bin a tro rec ip tb r - .. j ba t its cl � t e 1t1on .r 1 s �ilu.1� ""Q co p with hi r " 1.re- ent, r�s ond�nt ~;t:ded on � ay 51 l96lt ts la1 tor ide t r _r _ sh s n us rie � 75"5 ' te � to t ti~t1id tion D1 .... :f' p t1t1 r 1 1on by t I'Jivi ;..on, oth or the t.U'e o JJP 1aer cuato ' 11 th ein � .... sl 1 l"O f Jt t h � � � an l1 1 Liquid .t l on 1Vi 1 n on J n ry 2lt 961 an 1V1 len f the �� wl b r tb. u 0 1d r t, h ou t ma e eerti�1 1 n t t � r.rect hat :p t1tloner h s n er d1te or 1, 87. o, � t y .. e~ro a� �DV1.1Lo 11e o n � u nal uc he o. 70~63 ec m r , l 1. An � 1 � t.ne h r1n of this' e ,.
�- Dc C �1 ~- b.1 c 2, 196 t x er te 1 - � t � b resp nd _ t) p l � t '1 1 a �� � 1 � � J' 0 � 1a 1 t 1 � a a 1 � t. 1 a ot 1 1 tb r ��� ue � � �r u �t t ... � � 1o 0 1 � o jua etu al OJ'J t�1 � et e 1 e .' !fica 1o ot ica. 1 ' t b l- er u .., 0 � or C ic b b� ' -Cuat or aa uen � tber �� 1 e . on, r 1t � h ef ot 1 �' �0 rt t ve no s le t 0 l0 1 04
0 c cl � - o. 10 3 C ll - t . r of C to s an �the Commt � loner ot u �:0 all h v t'" nd �d a e1 ie on petit1onar ' _ �� I I1 1 ctl r .. ~ }p ei 1 th 1s ue t r- d 1 1o o q tit .o . r� t e Colle t of Ctlst � 1 t p ?6~01 ot e a.-11' an � c f: Co � As of t c t n Ct t � ;ntr1ea . 01. 22 9? 0 � p .t1o t- �a hi .m nts w re 4 to y �b - ppr 1' �. r 1 1 ion ( n t ut ), 1 1 port 1 or 1 S' .. l tro wr w: ten 1 tre That eu. � n ri U ui t 1 � th Liqui a 1o o Janu 21, 1961 Vith. t e 0 )t e us 1 ( a1 ot �u . l Cue om J lr a 1 r 1te~ to p 1t1o .r t 1,697. 0 t t c to 1 �uty a1 1n Cu t 1~~. er C to l o. �7056 :r 1 l ' 1 . 1 e 1 nr no et wi n 'th t o .� icb ~�r tn th r hi � t, it i prob bl e ute t Cus o 1 05
c � 1003 � 7- ., r ,1 lve 0 1 1 1 � t . ll � 1 ' 1 1' � � a 1 1 r it 2 .,7. lc i 81 t1 u I� 1. 06
c -o. � c e :] (. l ippa "'� lle f I t n1 �� � , . re 20, 5 J � � en r � o. L-51 3, ril 22, 19 3, �� r � ~ v. r l '' l� t In- c ll 0 0 � ot 1� �� 1 lt-9 t � v . ol- l t, � ,1 l .) � ~be 1 �1 p1 ebr t � 2' 5' 10 t I' 1 o er � t � r0 7, or 1 G r 0 1' r � ' ,0 0 lvt ae � � fc �1 'e 1 i r all 1 u 0 ut 1 t er 1 re - l' to chni liti t 1 1 nr 1r tt t �J t - ' r ti � 2, � o, 1 1 �� 1 � � c 0 � ne 1 ue 1 - - - -:.. �~. "!.~ �
T�- c � -- 0 � �.. p � t e 0 a ot n � 17 � ' l lJ - 11 r 1 a � i r al, � � l �� 1 00 �� � ' �t � � � s. > t� si e l e 0r t 0 t �� 0� ' ' ,. � ,. 1 08
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 6108 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6108)
- TRANSNATIONAL PLANS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2549)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 8236)
- CTA Case No. 5948 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5948)
- TULLETT PREBON (PHILIPPINES) INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2143)
- CTA Case No. 1931 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1931)
- TE DEUM RESOURCES, INC. v. CITY OF DAVAO and HON. RODRIGO S. RIOLA, in his official capacity as the City Treasurer of Davao City(CTA Case No. AC-142)
- MTI ADVANCED TEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2620)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.