Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 217240 of 550 articles for justice

Sandiganbayan Collegiality: Lessons from the Administrative Case Against Justices Ong, Hernandez, and Ponferra

The Supreme Court clarifies that Sandiganbayan divisions must sit as a collegial body, with all three justices present during trial proceedings.

Anib v. Coca-Cola: Technical Rules Yield to Substantial Justice in Labor Cases

Supreme Court reminds courts that procedural technicalities should not bar review of labor cases, remanding an illegal dismissal dispute for hearing on the merits.

Dismissal Disputes Balancing Procedural Rules With Substantial Justice IN Labor Cases

Explore how the Supreme Court prioritized substantial justice over procedural technicalities in a criminal case, ensuring fairness prevails.

Balancing Justice AND Procedure When Failure TO File AN Appeal Leads TO Dismissal

When failure to file an appeal brief leads to dismissal, the Supreme Court explains why procedural rules matter and when they may be relaxed.

Judicial Impartiality When Haste Undermines Justice in the Philippines

A look at the Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Padua on drug buy-bust operations, chain of custody, and the limits of judicial haste.

Accountability in Kidnapping: Justice Despite Fugitive Status and Evidentiary Challenges

Supreme Court affirms kidnap-for-ransom conviction, dismisses fugitive's appeal, and clarifies damages awards under Philippine law.

Judicial Accountability: The Price of Delay in Rendering Decisions

A judge's third offense of delay in rendering a decision resulted in a P25,000 fine, underscoring the judiciary's commitment to speedy justice.

Res Judicata and Forum Shopping: When Repeated Motions Delay Justice

Philippine National Bank v. Intestate Estate of Francisco de Guzman clarifies res judicata, forum shopping, and the limits of repeated motions to dismiss.

Timely Justice Determining THE Correct Appeal Method IN Land Valuation Cases

Learn how the Supreme Court resolved the proper appeal method and interest computation in land valuation cases under CARP.

When Can Courts Relax Procedural Rules? The Go v. Chaves Appeal Ruling

The Supreme Court reinstates an appeal dismissed on technical grounds, explaining when courts may relax procedural rules in the interest of substantial justice.

Balancing Justice and Procedure: When Technicalities Yield to Equity in Appeals

The Supreme Court clarifies when procedural rules prevail over equitable arguments in criminal appeals involving the Ombudsman.

Midnight Appointments and the Judiciary: The De Castro Ruling on the Constitutional Ban

The Supreme Court explains why the ban on midnight appointments does not apply to judicial posts, including the Chief Justice.

Substantial Justice Over Strict Procedure in Agrarian Appeals: DARAB Rules Liberally Construed

SC rules DARAB notices of appeal should be liberally construed; technical defects must not defeat substantial justice in agrarian cases.

Compassionate Justice vs Legal Obligation: Limits of Financial Assistance in Authorized Dismissals

Supreme Court rules employers cannot be forced to pay extra financial assistance beyond separation pay mandated by law for valid closures.

Court Premises Are Not for Commercial Use: A Lesson in Judicial Dignity

Philippine Supreme Court rules that Halls of Justice must be used exclusively for judicial functions, not commercial activities like raffle draws.

Judicial Appointments and the Election Ban: De Castro v. Judicial and Bar Council

The Supreme Court rules on whether the President may appoint the Chief Justice during the election ban on midnight appointments.

Ombudsman Cannot Probe Supreme Court Justices for Judicial Acts

Court dismisses Ombudsman complaint against retired Justices, limits Ombudsman power over judicial acts.

Streamlining Justice: When Ombudsman Orders Are Final and Unappealable

Learn when Ombudsman decisions become final and unappealable in administrative cases, and why the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals.

Dismissal of Administrative Charges Against CA Justice for Lack of Bad Faith and Harassment

Supreme Court dismisses administrative complaint against CA Justice Pizarro, ruling charges lacked bad faith and were meant to harass.

Treachery in Criminal Law: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Sudden Attacks

The Supreme Court explains when a sudden, unexpected attack qualifies as treachery, raising homicide to murder under Philippine law.

Judicial Accountability: The Price of Delayed Justice in the Philippines

A judge's 17-month delay in deciding a case leads to a fine, underscoring the constitutional duty to resolve cases promptly.

Judicial Accountability: The Cost of Undue Delay in Resolving Motions

When a Court of Appeals justice sat on a motion for nearly three years, the Supreme Court imposed a fine, reaffirming that judges must decide cases promptly.

Cooperative Members' Deposit Interest Exempt from Final Withholding Tax: DCCCO v. CIR

The Supreme Court ruled that cooperatives need not withhold 20% final tax on members' deposit interest, citing social justice.

When Courts Must Decide Independently: Withdrawal of Criminal Informations in the Philippines

Philippine courts must independently assess prosecutors' motions to withdraw criminal informations, not merely adopt the Secretary of Justice's recommendation.