Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Navigating Robbery With Homicide: The Perils of Indivisible Penalties
A look at People v. Pedroso, explaining robbery with homicide elements and the correct application of indivisible penalties.
Reasonable Doubt Acquittal in Robbery With Homicide: When Weak Evidence Fails
Supreme Court acquits robbery-with-homicide accused where eyewitness testimony lacked specificity and conspiracy was not proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Reclassifying Highway Robbery: When a Single Robbery Becomes Robbery With Homicide
Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between highway robbery under PD 532 and robbery with homicide under the Revised Penal Code.
Reasonable Doubt and Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony: Acquittal in Highway Robbery Case
The Supreme Court acquitted a highway robbery convict because the prosecution's sole eyewitness gave contradictory and unreliable testimony.
Rape AND Robbery Distinguishing Separate Crimes From A Special Complex Offense
Robbery With Rape: How Intimidation Proves Lack of Consent in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains how intimidation, not physical force, suffices to prove lack of consent in robbery with rape cases.
Positive Identification Prevails Over Alibi in Robbery with Rape Conviction
Supreme Court affirms robbery with rape conviction, ruling that positive identification by the victim outweighs the defense of alibi.
Robbery With Homicide: Proving Conspiracy and Liability of All Participants
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on robbery with homicide, conspiracy liability, and the penalty of reclusion perpetua when no aggravating circumstances exist.
Positive Identification Over Alibi Upholding Justice In Highway Robbery With Homicide
The Supreme Court affirms a highway robbery with homicide conviction, ruling that positive identification prevails over a weak alibi defense.
Circumstantial Evidence in Robbery With Homicide: When Conviction Stands Beyond Reasonable Doubt
The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for robbery with homicide, and why flight and unexplained absence signal guilt.
Qualified Theft vs Robbery with Homicide: Force and Intent Distinguished
Supreme Court clarifies when unlawful taking without proven force is qualified theft, not robbery with homicide.
State Witness Discharge and Justice in Philippine Robbery With Homicide Cases
Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling on discharging an accused as state witness in robbery with homicide, and the limits of that discharge.
Identifying Perpetrators Upholding Convictions IN Robbery With Rape Through Credible Witness Testimony
The Supreme Court affirms robbery with rape convictions, ruling that credible witness identification prevails over alibi and minor inconsistencies.
Distinguishing Homicide From Robbery With Homicide: Intent Is the Decisive Factor
The Supreme Court explains when taking a victim's property after a killing is theft, not robbery with homicide.
Evidentiary Burden in Robbery and Homicide Cases: Supreme Court Clarifies Proof Requirements
The Supreme Court clarifies what evidence proves robbery, rape, and aggravating circumstances in this 1999 ruling.
Robbery with Homicide: Understanding Liability and Damages in Philippine Law
A look at the Supreme Court ruling on robbery with homicide, witness credibility, aggravating circumstances, and damages in People v. Paraiso.
The Weight of Witness Testimony in Philippine Robbery with Homicide Convictions
How a single credible eyewitness identification and proven conspiracy secured a robbery with homicide conviction in the Philippines.
Proving Guilt Beyond Doubt: How Circumstantial Evidence Works in Philippine Robbery with Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices to convict for robbery with homicide, and why alibi fails.
Alibi and Denial in Philippine Criminal Cases: Lessons from People v. Raganas
Why alibi and denial rarely convince Philippine courts, explained through People v. Raganas, a robbery with homicide case built on circumstantial evidence.
When Silence Condemns: The Decisive Role of Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Robbery Homicide Cases
How the Supreme Court upheld a robbery-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, not direct testimony, in People v. Raganas.
Conspiracy in Robbery With Homicide: When Presence Means Principal Liability in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how conspiracy in robbery with homicide makes all participants liable as principals, even without direct participation in the killing.
Circumstantial Evidence and Confessions to Confidants: Robbery with Homicide Conviction
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery-with-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and voluntary admissions to a trusted police officer.
Robbery with Homicide: When Circumstantial Evidence and Voluntary Confessions Convict
The Supreme Court affirms a robbery-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence and voluntary admissions to a confidant, not custodial interrogation.
Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony in Robbery Homicide Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Despite Affida
Court rules sworn affidavit inconsistencies do not automatically destroy an eyewitness's credibility when open-court testimony is clear and positive.