Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Procedural Lapses Lead to Acquittal
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect due to broken chain of custody, underscoring strict compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165.
Notarization Is Not Routine: Lessons from a Lawyer’s Suspension for Notarial Misconduct
A lawyer was suspended for notarizing documents without verifying identities and letting secretaries notarize. Learn the rules and duties.
Security of Tenure vs Qualification Standards Resolving Employment Disputes in Philippine Higher Education
Supreme Court clarifies retirement age rules, security of tenure, and CBA benefits for managerial employees in Philippine schools.
Chain of Custody and Reasonable Doubt: Safeguarding Rights in Drug Cases
The Supreme Court acquits two accused in a drug case due to the police's failure to comply with Section 21 of RA 9165, emphasizing the importance of the chain of custody rule.
Chain of Custody Rule in Drug Cases: Why Witnesses Must Be Present at Seizure
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure the required witnesses during inventory, reinforcing the chain of custody rule.
Protecting Rights Illegal Drug Possession AND THE Chain OF Custody Rule
The Supreme Court acquits a drug possession accused because police failed to comply with Section 21's witness requirements, reinforcing the chain of custody rule.
Fixed-Term Contracts vs Security of Tenure: Protecting Employee Rights in the Philippines
The Supreme Court clarifies when fixed-term employment contracts are valid and when they violate an employee's security of tenure under Philippine law.
Prolonged Preliminary Investigation and Speedy Disposition: What the Supreme Court Said
A dismissed criminal case for failure to prosecute raises the question: when does delay violate the right to speedy disposition of cases?
Consent Is Key: Why Force, Threat, or Intimidation Matters in Rape Cases
The Supreme Court acquits a rape accused after the prosecution fails to prove force or intimidation, underscoring that consent—or its absence—is the crux of every rape charge.
Safeguarding Rights Strict Adherence TO THE Three Witness Rule IN Drug Cases
The Supreme Court acquits an accused in a drug case for the police's failure to comply with the three-witness rule under Section 21 of RA 9165.
Chain of Custody Lapses Overturn Drug Conviction: People v. Roales
Supreme Court acquits drug offender due to unjustified lapses in Section 21 chain of custody procedure, stressing strict compliance.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Strict Compliance with Section 21 Matters
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to justify the absence of required witnesses during inventory, underscoring the chain of custody rule.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony
Supreme Court acquits prosecutor of direct bribery, ruling that inconsistent prosecution testimony failed to prove the gift was given in consideration of official action.
Reasonable Doubt When Evidence Fails to Prove Illegal Drug Transport
The Supreme Court acquits three accused of transporting shabu where prosecution failed to prove they were on board the vehicle and broke the chain of custody.
Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Balancing Litigant Diligence and Court Responsibility
The Supreme Court clarifies when dismissal for failure to prosecute is proper, emphasizing courts should decide cases on their merits.
When Buy-Bust Operations Fail the Chain of Custody: Acquittal in People v. Moreno
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure required witnesses under Section 21, RA 9165.
Chain of Custody Safeguarding Drug Evidence and Ensuring Fair Trials
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect after police failed to secure an elected official and follow Section 21 of RA 9165.
Broken Chain of Custody: How Strict Evidence Handling Secured an Acquittal in a Drug Case
In People v. Sumilip, the Supreme Court acquitted a drug-sale accused after finding the police failed to preserve the chain of custody of the seized marijuana.
Strict Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Procedural Lapses Lead to Acquittal
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect due to broken chain of custody, reinforcing strict compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165.
Strict Compliance With Drug Evidence Procedures Protects the Accused's Rights
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to follow Section 21 chain of custody rules under RA 9165.
Flaws in Drug Evidence Chain of Custody and Rights in Illegal Drug Cases
The Supreme Court acquits drug suspects when police fail to strictly follow Section 21 chain of custody rules under RA 9165.
Safeguarding Rights: The Importance of Chain of Custody in Drug Cases
The Supreme Court acquits two drug suspects due to the prosecution's failure to comply with the chain of custody rule under Section 21 of RA 9165.
Flaws in Drug Evidence Handling Lead to Acquittal: Strict Chain of Custody Vital
Philippine Supreme Court acquits drug suspect over broken chain of custody and illegal arrest, stressing strict Section 21 compliance.
Jurisdiction Over Public Prosecutors: When the Supreme Court Defers to the Ombudsman
The Supreme Court clarifies that administrative complaints against public prosecutors for official acts fall under the Ombudsman's jurisdiction, not the IBP.