Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Rape Conviction Stands but Death Penalty Falls: Proving the Victim's Age
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction but reduces the death penalty to reclusion perpetua, clarifying the burden of proving the victim's age.
Silence Is Not Always Acquiescence: Rape Conviction Upheld Despite Delayed Reporting
Philippine Supreme Court explains why a child victim's silence and delayed reporting do not weaken a rape conviction, and clarifies penalties for sexual assault.
Protecting the Vulnerable: The Importance of Age Verification in Rape Cases
How the Supreme Court upheld a rape conviction, emphasizing that a minor victim's delayed reporting does not weaken her credible testimony.
Rape Conviction Affirmed: Victim Credibility and Delay in Reporting Explained
Philippine Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, explains why a child victim's testimony is credible despite delay in reporting and why alibi failed.
Rape Conviction and the Burden of Proving the Victim's Age for the Death Penalty
A look at People v. Cantuba on how positive identification overcomes alibi, and why proving the victim's age matters for sentencing.
Treachery and Positive Identification: Conviction Upheld in Murder Case
The Supreme Court affirms a murder conviction based on positive identification by two eyewitnesses and treachery, despite the accused's alibi and denial.
Positive Identification Over Alibi: Credibility in Murder Conviction
How the Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based on eyewitness positive identification, rejecting alibi and affirming treachery in People v. Estrada.
Proving Treachery and Evident Premeditation: People v. Loterono on Homicide vs. Murder
The Supreme Court explains why treachery and evident premeditation must be proven beyond reasonable doubt to convict for murder, not homicide.
Shifting Sands of Evidence: Drug Sale Convictions and the Weight of Testimony
A look at how the Supreme Court weighs conflicting police testimonies in drug busts, and why aggravating circumstances must be alleged in the information.
Protecting the Vulnerable: Parental Authority vs Incestuous Rape in Philippine Law
A father raped his two daughters. The Supreme Court affirmed conviction but reduced the death penalty to reclusion perpetua for failure to allege the victim's age.
Rape Conviction Reversed: When Doubt Outweighs a Victim's Testimony
The Supreme Court acquitted a rape accused despite the victim's testimony, showing when reasonable doubt prevails over credibility findings.
Balancing Justice AND Procedure When Strict Rules Give WAY
When a counsel's negligence threatens a client's appeal, the Supreme Court shows when strict procedural rules yield to substantial justice.
Quasi-Delict Liability in Vehicular Accidents: When Negligence and Vicarious Responsibility Apply
The Supreme Court clarifies negligence, proximate cause, and vicarious liability in a vehicular accident quasi-delict case under Articles 2176 and 2180.
HLURB Jurisdiction vs Unlawful Detainer: Defining the Boundaries in Property Disputes
The Supreme Court clarifies when the HLURB has jurisdiction over subdivision lot disputes and when ejectment cases belong in regular courts.
Determining Jurisdiction in Reconveyance Cases: RTC vs MTC Competence
When does the RTC, not the MTC, hear a reconveyance case? The Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction rules in Copioso v. Copioso.
Rape Conviction Upheld Categorical Identification AND THE Absence OF Consent
Philippine Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, explaining categorical victim identification and how resistance, not consent, defines the crime.
Solid Rock vs Joint Survey: When Evidence Determines Fault in Vehicular Accidents
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies negligence and vicarious liability in vehicular accidents, emphasizing evidence over mere allegations in quasi-delict claims.
Treachery in Criminal Law: Establishing Intent and Opportunity for Self-Defense
The Supreme Court explains how treachery qualifies a killing as murder, focusing on sudden attack and the victim's lack of defense opportunity.
Treachery and Unlicensed Firearms: Navigating Murder and Frustrated Murder Convictions
The Supreme Court clarifies treachery, unlicensed firearm aggravating circumstances, and penalties in murder and frustrated murder cases.
Treachery and Conspiracy in Murder Cases: Key Lessons from People v. San Pascual
How the Supreme Court applied treachery and conspiracy to convict five accused of murder in People v. San Pascual.
Self-Defense in Parricide: When Unlawful Aggression Is Not Enough
The Supreme Court rejected a son's self-defense claim after he shot his father, clarifying the strict requirements for justifying a killing under Philippine law.
Suggestive Identification Taints Conviction: Safeguarding Fair Trials in Philippine Criminal Law
The Supreme Court acquits a robbery-homicide convict because a suggestive mug shot tainted eyewitness identification, reaffirming the need for fair trials.
Remand and Redistricting: The Supreme Court's Ruling on BAA 77 and BARMM Elections
The Supreme Court struck down BAA 77 as unconstitutional, halting the October 13, 2025 BARMM parliamentary elections. Learn the key rules.
Rape and the Burden of Proof: Establishing Minority in Statutory Rape Cases
In People v. Tupaz, the Supreme Court ruled that a rape victim's bare testimony of her age is insufficient to prove minority for the death penalty.