From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–48 of 185 articles for “intimidation”

Rape Conviction Upheld Clarifying THE Application OF Force AND Intimidation IN Sexual Assault Cases

Rape Conviction Affirmed: Force, Intimidation, and Moral Ascendancy in Sexual Assault Cases

The Supreme Court affirms a stepfather's rape conviction, explaining how force, intimidation, and moral ascendancy satisfy the elements of rape under Philippine law.

Rape Conviction Affirmed: Force, Intimidation, and Moral Ascendancy in Sexual Abuse Cases

Philippine Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, explaining how force, intimidation, and moral ascendancy establish guilt in sexual abuse cases.

Rape Conviction Affirmed: Force and Intimidation Defined in Philippine Law

The Supreme Court clarifies force and intimidation in rape cases, affirming a conviction and increasing damages awarded to the victim.

Moral Ascendancy in Statutory Rape: Redefining Intimidation in Familial Abuse Cases

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that moral ascendancy replaces force or intimidation in rape by a common-law father, protecting minor victims.

Acquittal in Rape Case: The Crucial Role of Force, Threat or Intimidation

The Supreme Court acquitted a rape accused because the prosecution failed to prove force, threat, or intimidation, a required element of rape.

Moral Ascendancy in Rape Cases: When Power Substitutes for Force Under Philippine Law

How the Supreme Court ruled that moral ascendancy can substitute for physical threat or intimidation in rape cases, protecting vulnerable victims.

Moral Ascendancy in Incestuous Rape: Upholding Protection for Child Victims

The Supreme Court affirms the conviction of a father for qualified rape, explaining how parental moral ascendancy substitutes for force and intimidation.

Reasonable Doubt in Robbery Cases: Insufficient Proof of Threat Leads to Acquittal

Supreme Court acquits robbery convict where prosecution failed to prove intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. Learn the rules.

Parental Authority vs Child's Rights: Defining Intimidation in Qualified Rape Cases

Supreme Court clarifies intimidation in incestuous qualified rape, affirming father's conviction for three counts against minor daughter.

Rape Conviction Affirmed: Credibility of a Minor Victim's Testimony in Sexual Assault Cases

Supreme Court affirms rape conviction based on a minor's credible testimony, rejecting the sweetheart defense and clarifying force and intimidation requirements.

Rape and Consent: How the Sweetheart Defense Fails Against Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Philippine Supreme Court explains why the sweetheart defense cannot defeat a rape conviction when the victim's testimony proves force and intimidation.

Rape Conviction Affirmed: Intimidation and the "Sweetheart Defense" in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court affirms rape conviction based on intimidation, rejecting the uncorroborated "sweetheart defense" and clarifying damages.

Challenging the Sweetheart Defense: Consensual vs Forced Intimacy in Philippine Rape Cases

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when the "sweetheart defense" fails in rape cases, and how courts weigh consent against force and intimidation.

Rape Conviction Upheld: Intimidation Overcomes Lack of Physical Resistance

Philippine Supreme Court rules that intimidation, not physical resistance, is key in rape cases, upholding a conviction based on a knife threat.

Consummation of Rape: Penetration, Force, and Legal Standards in Philippine Law

Philippine jurisprudence on rape requires proof of penetration and force or intimidation. This article explains the legal standards and practical implications.

Rape Conviction Affirmed: Force, Intimidation, and Credibility in Philippine Criminal Law

The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, explaining force, intimidation, witness credibility, and damages in Philippine criminal law.

Upholding Conviction in Rape Cases: Credibility and the Element of Force

The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, explaining how trial courts assess witness credibility and prove force or intimidation.

Self-Defense Under Scrutiny: When Does a Threat Justify Homicide in the Philippines?

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a threat justifies killing in self-defense, requiring actual unlawful aggression, not mere intimidation.

Rape Conviction Upheld: Victim Credibility and Use of Intimidation

Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, ruling that a credible victim's testimony and the use of a deadly weapon suffice to prove guilt.

Protecting Children Upholding Justice IN Child Abuse AND Rape Cases Under Philippine LAW

A look at how Philippine courts decide rape cases, the weight given to credible victim testimony, and the rules on force, intimidation, and delay in reporting.

Reasonable Doubt in Rape Cases: Proving Force and Intimidation Under Philippine Law

The Supreme Court's acquittal in People v. Lumpayao shows why force, threat, or intimidation must be proven beyond reasonable doubt in rape cases.

When Snatching a Bag Is Theft, Not Robbery: The Violence Requirement

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that snatching a bag without violence or intimidation is theft, not robbery, even if a death occurs.

Breach of Trust: Examining Guilt in Step-Parent Rape Cases Under Philippine Law

The Supreme Court affirms a stepfather's rape conviction, explaining how moral ascendancy and threats establish intimidation in incestuous rape.