From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–44 of 44 articles for “prior possession”

Ejectment Cases and Land Ownership: When Prior Possession Does Not Bar Unlawful Detainer

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on unlawful detainer, COSLAP jurisdiction, and Torrens title imprescriptibility in Cayabyab v. Gomez de Aquino.

Prior Possession vs Ownership: Resolving Property Disputes in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between forcible entry, accion publiciana, and accion reivindicatoria in property disputes.

Prior Possession Prevails in Forcible Entry: Claudio v. Quebral

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that in forcible entry cases, prior physical possession—not ownership—determines who recovers the property.

Prior Possession and Ejectment: When Tolerance Turns Into Unlawful Detainer

Learn how prior possession, tolerance, and demand letters determine whether an ejectment case is forcible entry or unlawful detainer.

Forcible Entry and Prior Possession: What Must Be Proven in Philippine Property Disputes

Learn how Philippine courts decide forcible entry cases by examining prior physical possession, evidence rules, and the limits of ownership claims.

Forcible Entry in the Philippines: Why Prior Possession Wins Cases

Learn how prior physical possession, not ownership, decides forcible entry cases in the Philippines, guided by Dumo v. Espinas.

Forcible Entry: The Imperative of Detailing the Means of Dispossession in Pleadings

A forcible entry complaint must allege prior possession and the specific means of dispossession—force, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth—or it fails.

Ejectment Suits: Proving Prior Possession in Forcible Entry Cases

Learn how Philippine courts decide forcible entry cases, focusing on the key requirement of prior physical possession and jurisdictional rules.

Prior Possession Prevails Resolving Forcible Entry Disputes in the Philippines

Learn how Philippine courts resolve forcible entry cases by protecting prior physical possession, with insights from a Supreme Court ruling.

Torrens Title vs Prior Possession: Resolving Property Disputes in the Philippines

Philippine property disputes often pit Torrens title holders against prior possessors. Learn how courts resolve these conflicts under law.

Squatters' Rights: Prior Possession Prevails in Ejectment Cases

Philippine Supreme Court rules that prior physical possession, not ownership, determines ejectment cases even between squatters on public land.

Upholding Prior Possession When Courts Must Correct Errors in Forcible Entry Disputes

The Supreme Court clarifies when appellate courts may review factual findings in forcible entry cases, emphasizing prior physical possession.

Upholding Prior Possession HOW Forcible Entry Claims Protect Land Cultivators IN THE Philippines

Unlawful Detainer vs. Forcible Entry: Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Barba v. Court of Appeals

Supreme Court clarifies unlawful detainer jurisdiction, prior possession requirements, and ownership issues in ejectment cases under Philippine law.

Forcible Entry in the Philippines: Proving Prior Possession and Unlawful Deprivation

Understand the requirements for forcible entry cases in the Philippines, including prior possession and unlawful deprivation, based on the Ong v. Parel ruling.

Torrens Title Prevails Challenging Land Ownership Based on Prior Possession

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how a registered Torrens title defeats claims of ownership based on prior possession, tax declarations, and long occupancy.

Upholding Torrens Titles Ownership Rights Prevail Over Claims Of Prior Possession

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on Torrens titles, reconstitution requirements, and laches in land ownership disputes.

Confirmation of Imperfect Title: Prior Possession of Forest Land Not Counted in 30-Year Requirement

Philippine Supreme Court rules that possession of forest land before its classification as alienable cannot be counted toward the 30-year requirement for confirmation of imperfect title.

Unlawful Detainer in the Philippines: Prior Possession Not Required to File Suit

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that prior physical possession is not required to file unlawful detainer, and ownership disputes do not bar the case.

Accion Publiciana: Recovering Possession of Real Property in the Philippines

Learn how Philippine courts resolve accion publiciana cases—recovery of real property possession—through this Supreme Court ruling on prior possession vs. occupancy permits.