Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Chain of Custody in Drug Busts: Why Missing Witnesses Can Break a Case
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police skipped required witnesses at inventory. Learn the chain of custody rule.
The Chain of Custody Rule in Drug Cases: Why Insulating Witnesses Matter
A look at People v. Flores, where the Supreme Court acquitted an accused due to a broken chain of custody under Section 21 of RA 9165.
Chain of Custody in Drug Busts: Why Insulating Witnesses Matter
The Supreme Court acquits three accused in a drug bust for broken chain of custody, reiterating the strict rules under Section 21 of RA 9165.
Ensuring Integrity in Drug Seizures: The Crucial Role of the Three Witness Rule in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies that Section 21 of RA 9165 requires three witnesses during drug inventory, even when serving a search warrant.
Ensuring Integrity in Drug Busts: The Crucial Role of Witnesses and Chain of Custody
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect, stressing that third-party witnesses must be present during arrest and seizure, not just inventory.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Witnesses and Marking Matter
Philippine Supreme Court explains the chain of custody rule in drug cases and why proper marking, inventory, and witnesses are essential.
Chain of Custody Gaps and Missing Witnesses Lead to Acquittal in Drug Case
Supreme Court acquits drug suspect after police fail to justify missing Section 21 witnesses, breaking the chain of custody.
Chain of Custody in Drug Busts: Why Witnesses Must Be Present at Seizure
Philippine Supreme Court acquits drug suspects over missing chain of custody witnesses, stressing Section 21 RA 9165 compliance.
Ensuring Integrity in Drug Busts: The Critical Role of Chain of Custody in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure required witnesses during inventory, underscoring the chain of custody rule.
Acquittal in Drug Case Highlights Strict Chain of Custody and Witness Rules
Supreme Court acquits drug suspect, stressing strict compliance with chain of custody and required witnesses under RA 9165.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Missing Witnesses Can Overturn a Conviction
A Supreme Court ruling shows how failure to secure required witnesses during drug evidence inventory can lead to acquittal.
Acquittal in Drug Case: When Police Lapses in Chain of Custody Lead to Freedom
The Supreme Court acquits a drug possession accused after police failed to secure required witnesses during inventory, explaining the chain of custody rule.
Challenging Drug Possession: Upholding the Chain of Custody in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court acquits a drug possession accused after police failed to justify the absence of required witnesses during inventory, reaffirming the strict chain of custody rule.
Chain of Custody Rule in Drug Cases: Why Witnesses Must Be Present at Seizure
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure the required witnesses during inventory, reinforcing the chain of custody rule.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Strict Compliance with Section 21 Matters
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to justify the absence of required witnesses during inventory, underscoring the chain of custody rule.
Understanding the Elements of Rape and the Power of Victim Testimony in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court explains how a victim's credible testimony can prove rape, even without physical injuries or eyewitnesses.
When Buy-Bust Operations Fail the Chain of Custody: Acquittal in People v. Moreno
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure required witnesses under Section 21, RA 9165.
Chain of Custody and Witness Requirements in Drug Cases: Safeguarding the Accused's Rights
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to justify missing witnesses during inventory and mishandled evidence authentication.
Safeguarding Rights: The Importance of Witness Presence in Drug Cases
Why a drug conviction was overturned when police skipped required witnesses and delayed marking evidence in a buy-bust operation.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: When Police Lapses Lead to Acquittal
The Supreme Court acquits two drug suspects after police fail to justify missing witnesses during inventory, reinforcing strict chain of custody rules.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Missing Witnesses Can Overturn a Conviction
Philippine Supreme Court acquits drug possession convict because police failed to justify the absence of required witnesses during inventory.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Strict Compliance or Acquittal
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect when police fail to justify missing witnesses during inventory, reinforcing strict chain of custody rules.
Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Missing Witnesses Can Mean Acquittal
The Supreme Court acquitted a drug possession convict because police failed to secure required witnesses during inventory. Learn the chain of custody rules.
Safeguarding Liberty: The Vital Witness Requirements in Drug Cases
The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police failed to secure required witnesses during inventory, reaffirming strict compliance with Section 21, RA 9165.