From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 481–504 of 671 articles for “justice”

Challenging Local Tax Ordinances: The 30-Day Appeal Rule Under Section 187

Taxpayers must appeal to the Secretary of Justice within 30 days of a local tax ordinance's effectivity or lose the right to challenge it in court.

Technicalities vs Justice: When Procedural Errors Can Cost You Your Case

Learn from El Reyno Homes v. Ong how missed deadlines and missing documents can end your case, even when the facts seem to favor you.

Judicial Efficiency: The Price of Delay in Delivering Justice

A judge's seven-month delay in deciding a case leads to a fine for gross inefficiency, underscoring that justice delayed is justice denied.

Upholding Due Process: Strict Adherence to Summary Procedure Timelines in Philippine Courts

Philippine courts must strictly follow summary procedure timelines. Learn how the Supreme Court enforces these deadlines to ensure speedy justice.

Treachery and the Element of Surprise: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Sudden Attacks

The Supreme Court explains how sudden, unprovoked attacks constitute treachery, qualifying killings as murder and frustrated murder.

Upholding Judicial Integrity: Sandiganbayan Justice Fined for Misconduct and Media Stunt

Supreme Court fines retired Sandiganbayan Justice Badoy for conduct unbecoming a Justice and delay in resolving a motion.

Procedural Technicalities vs Substantial Justice: Reinstating a Petition Dismissed on Technical Grounds

When can courts overlook procedural lapses? The Supreme Court clarifies that substantial justice prevails over mere technicalities in this 2003 ruling.

Substantial Compliance Prevails When Procedural Rules Meet Substantive Justice

Supreme Court ruling on substantial compliance with non-forum shopping certification requirements in corporate cases.

Judicial Delay When Inaction Becomes Injustice: A Philippine Case Study

When judges delay decisions, justice suffers. This case shows how inaction becomes an administrative offense under Philippine law.

Judicial Accountability: The Consequences of Undue Delay in Rendering Decisions

A retired judge fined for failing to decide cases on time—what this means for judicial accountability and the public's right to speedy justice.

Treachery Defined: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Sudden Attacks in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies treachery and self-defense in sudden attacks, affirming that bare claims of self-defense cannot overcome clear evidence of guilt.

Expediting Justice: Why Election Protests Favor Speed Over Rigid Procedure

In Quintos v. COMELEC, the Supreme Court allowed a trial court first access to contested ballot boxes, showing that speedy election protest resolution outweighs rigid rules.

Balancing Justice AND Procedure When Strict Rules Give WAY

When a counsel's negligence threatens a client's appeal, the Supreme Court shows when strict procedural rules yield to substantial justice.

Relaxing Rules When Imperfecting an Appeal Serves Justice in the Philippines

Philippine courts may relax procedural rules on appeals when justice demands, but litigants must still prove their claims and avoid forum shopping.

Condonation of Procedural Lapses When Substantial Justice Outweighs Strict Rules

Philippine Supreme Court explains when late payment of appeal docket fees may be excused to serve substantial justice.

Reviving the Pursuit of Justice: Prescription in Anti-Graft Cases and the Ombudsman's Duty

The Supreme Court clarifies prescription rules for anti-graft cases and the Ombudsman's duty to investigate, not dismiss, based on valid laws.

Rape Conviction Affirmed Despite Date Discrepancy Protecting Victims AND Ensuring Justice

Learn how the Supreme Court upheld a rape conviction despite a date discrepancy in the information, protecting victims and ensuring justice.

Treachery and Criminal Liability: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Sudden Attacks in Philippine Law

The Supreme Court clarifies when treachery qualifies a killing as murder, the rules on warrantless arrests, and the consequences of failing to object to inadmissible evidence.

Treachery Defined: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Sudden Attack

The Supreme Court explains treachery in murder cases, affirming conviction where a victim was attacked without warning or chance to defend.

When Silence Speaks: Delayed Reporting, Statutory Rape, and the Pursuit of Justice

Exploring how delayed reporting affects statutory rape cases, the credibility of victims, and the pursuit of justice under Philippine law.

Treachery Defined: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Sudden and Unexpected Attacks in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies treachery as a qualifying circumstance in murder, emphasizing sudden, unexpected attacks that deprive victims of any chance to defend themselves.

Treachery in Criminal Law: Ensuring Justice for Victims of Unexpected Attacks

How the Supreme Court defined treachery in a Christmas Day killing, and why evident premeditation needs more than mere threats.

Timeliness Matters: A Judge's Duty to Promptly Resolve Cases Under Philippine Law

The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction while reminding judges of their duty to decide cases promptly, exploring the importance of timely justice.

Fleeing Justice: How Absence Can Imply Guilt in Philippine Law

The Supreme Court explains when flight from arrest signals guilt, and why absence alone cannot prove conspiracy or treachery.