From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 529–552 of 637 articles for “drug cases”

Drug Sale Conviction Affirmed: Entrapment Evidence and Legal Presumptions in Shabu Cases

Supreme Court affirms drug sale and possession conviction, explaining buy-bust operations, entrapment evidence, and presumptions in Philippine drug cases.

Entrapment vs Instigation: When Buy-Bust Operations Are Valid in Philippine Drug Cases

Philippine Supreme Court explains the difference between valid entrapment and unlawful instigation in buy-bust operations, using Cruz v. People.

Buy-Bust Operations: Ensuring Legality and Upholding Rights in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court affirms a drug conviction, clarifying the rules on buy-bust operations, warrantless arrests, and the chain of custody of seized drugs.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Broken Links Can Mean Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquits a drug suspect because police broke the chain of custody, stressing strict proof of the seized drug's identity.

Integrity OF Evidence Acquittal IN Drug Cases DUE TO Procedural Lapses IN Evidence Handling

Challenging Drug Convictions: How Due Process Protects Against Unlawful Searches and Seizures

Learn how Philippine courts protect the accused from unlawful searches and seizures, and what due process means for drug cases.

Entrapment vs Frame-Up: Proving Illegal Drug Sale Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The Supreme Court explains the difference between valid buy-bust entrapment and a mere frame-up in drug cases, and what evidence convicts.

Entrapment vs Illegal Arrest: Warrantless Arrests in Drug Cases

When is a warrantless arrest in a buy-bust operation valid? The Supreme Court explains the difference between entrapment and illegal arrest.

Buy-Bust Operations: Conviction Upheld Despite Procedural Lapses in Drug Cases

Supreme Court affirms drug conviction despite missing pre-operation reports and inventory lapses, clarifying what really matters in buy-bust cases.

Buy-Bust Operations and Warrantless Arrests: Safeguarding Individual Rights in Drug Cases

A look at how the Supreme Court treats buy-bust operations as valid warrantless arrests under Philippine drug law, and what this means for accused persons.

Entrapment vs Instigation: Safeguarding Rights in Drug Cases

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the line between valid entrapment and unlawful instigation in drug buy-bust operations under RA 9165.

Buy-Bust Operations and Instigation: When Police Tactics Are Valid in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies the line between valid entrapment and prohibited instigation in drug buy-bust operations under RA 9165.

Entrapment vs Instigation in Drug Cases: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between valid entrapment and prohibited instigation in buy-bust operations, and the burden of proof in drug cases.

Conspiracy and Group Criminal Acts: How Philippine Courts Weigh Evidence in Drug Cases

In Dacles v. People, the Supreme Court upheld a drug conviction based on police testimony and explained how courts treat defenses of denial and frame-up.

Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Fair Trial Standards in Philippine Drug Cases

Supreme Court acquits drug suspect when buy-bust evidence is riddled with inconsistencies, reaffirming the presumption of innocence and the objective test.

Reasonable Doubt Prevails When Inconsistent Evidence Leads TO Acquittal IN Drug Cases

Buy-Bust Operations in Drug Cases: When Arrests and Evidence Are Valid

Learn when warrantless arrests and searches in buy-bust operations are legal, and how evidence stays admissible in Philippine drug cases.

Valid Buy-Bust Operation Upholds Conviction Despite Chain of Custody Concerns in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court affirms a drug conviction, ruling that minor lapses in chain of custody do not automatically warrant acquittal when the evidence's integrity is preserved.

Buy-Bust Operations and the Objective Test in Philippine Drug Cases

The Supreme Court explains the "objective" test for buy-bust operations and when a lone police witness can prove drug selling beyond reasonable doubt.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: Why Unbroken Evidence Integrity Matters

Philippine Supreme Court acquits drug suspect over broken chain of custody, stressing the need to prove the seized drugs' identity beyond reasonable doubt.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: When Non-Compliance with RA 9165 Is Not Fatal

The Supreme Court explains when lapses in Section 21 custody rules won't invalidate drug evidence, and why objections must be raised at trial.

Upholding the Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: People v. Pringas

The Supreme Court clarifies that non-compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165 is not fatal if the integrity of seized drugs is preserved.

Entrapment VS Instigation Safeguarding Rights IN Drug Cases 3

Entrapment VS Instigation Safeguarding Rights IN Drug Cases 2