Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 124 of 126 articles for drugs

When an Appeal Is Dismissed for Late Brief: The Licup Ruling on Substantial Justice

The Supreme Court nullified the CA's dismissal of an appeal due to a late brief, citing substantial justice and liberty interests.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: How a Judicial Admission Can Affect Your Rights in the Philippines

A judicial admission can excuse gaps in the chain of custody—but only up to a point. Learn how the Supreme Court applied this rule in a drug possession case.

Court Employee’s Drug Conviction Leads to Fine, Forfeiture of Retirement Benefits

A Supreme Court ruling shows how a court utility worker’s drug conviction led to forfeited retirement benefits and permanent disqualification from public office.

Child Custody in the Philippines: The Best Interest of the Child Standard

Philippine courts decide child custody disputes by one standard: the child's best interest. Learn the factors, the law, and a landmark 2024 ruling.

Human Trafficking in the Philippines: Qualified Trafficking and Child Protection Under RA 9208

Philippine law treats trafficking of minors as qualified trafficking with severe penalties. A recent Supreme Court ruling shows how victim testimony secures convictions.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: How a Broken Link Leads to Acquittal

A broken chain of custody can overturn drug convictions. Learn the strict rules under RA 9165 and what the Cordova ruling means.

Chain of Custody and the Saving Clause in Philippine Drug Cases

When a flawed drug bust still stands: the saving clause under Section 21, RA 9165, explained through a recent Supreme Court ruling.

Mandamus and Inordinate Delay in Government Investigations: Key Lessons from Baquirin v. Dela Rosa

The Supreme Court clarifies when mandamus can compel government investigation of alleged extrajudicial killings, and why standing and hierarchy of courts matter.

Legal Standing and Public Interest Litigation: When Can You Sue the Government in the Philippines?

The Supreme Court explains legal standing, hierarchy of courts, and when citizens may sue the government in this 2023 mandamus ruling.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: A Broken Link Leads to Acquittal

When police skip the required on-site inventory without justification, the chain of custody breaks and drug convictions may be overturned.

Supreme Court Acquits Drug Suspects: Strict Chain of Custody Still Required

The Supreme Court acquitted two drug suspects because police failed to justify why the inventory was not done at the arrest site. Learn the rule.

Supreme Court on Plea Bargaining: Courts May Overrule Prosecution's Objection in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when trial courts can allow plea bargaining in drug cases despite prosecution objections, citing People v. Montierro.

Hot Pursuit Arrests: When Is a Warrant Required in the Philippines

The Supreme Court explains the limits of warrantless hot pursuit arrests and the chain of custody rule for seized drugs.

Gross Negligence of Counsel Can Restore the Right to Appeal in Criminal Cases

When a lawyer's gross negligence and misrepresentations cause a client to lose the right to appeal, the Supreme Court may recall the entry of judgment and reinstate the appeal.

Chain of Custody Breaks Lead to Acquittal in Election Weapon Ban Case

Supreme Court acquits accused in election weapons ban case due to broken chain of custody over seized folding knife.

Omission of Drug Quantity in Information: Can Conviction Still Stand?

The Supreme Court clarifies when an Information's failure to state drug quantity affects conviction and penalty in drug cases.

Plea Bargaining in Drug Cases: DOJ Guidelines and Court Discretion in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies when trial courts may approve plea bargaining in drug cases and the role of evidence in resolving objections.

Understanding the One-Specific-Offense Rule for Search Warrants in Philippine Drug Cases

A defective search warrant covering multiple offenses voids seizures, even if the accused waives objections to arrest.

Letter of Authority Required When Reassigning Tax Audits: Supreme Court Ruling

Supreme Court nullifies tax assessments where audits were reassigned without a new Letter of Authority. Learn the rules.

Balancing Justice and Procedure When Counsel's Negligence Impacts an Appeal

The Supreme Court rules that a counsel's failure to file a brief on time should not cost an accused his appeal, especially when liberty is at stake.

Breach of Public Trust When Negligence in Procurement Leads to Graft Conviction

Supreme Court affirms graft conviction of DOH supply officer for gross inexcusable negligence in anomalous drug purchases, clarifying liability under RA 3019.

Unreasonable Searches Evidence Inadmissible When Police Exceed Warrant Scope

When police exceed a search warrant's scope and violate Section 21, seized evidence becomes inadmissible, potentially leading to case dismissal.

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine: When Illegal Searches Taint Evidence in Administrative Cases

The Supreme Court ruled that evidence from an illegal search cannot be used in administrative proceedings, reinforcing the exclusionary rule's reach.

Illegal Arrests and the Ombudsman's Role: What the Somira Drug Case Teaches

A 2021 Supreme Court ruling clarifies buy-bust arrests, chain of custody, and why the Ombudsman matters in drug cases.