From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 553–575 of 575 articles for “rape case”

Rape Conviction: The Power of Victim Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence in Philippine Law

How Philippine courts weigh victim testimony and circumstantial evidence in rape cases, explained through People v. Gomez.

Consent and Credibility in Rape Cases: Lessons from Philippine Jurisprudence

A 1997 Supreme Court ruling on rape underscores how victim credibility and positive identification shape convictions, offering key lessons for criminal law.

Consent and Intimidation in Rape Cases: Lessons from People v. Antido

The Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Antido clarifies how consent and intimidation are weighed in rape prosecutions.

Rape and Consent: Force, Intimidation, and Victim Testimony in Philippine Law

How Philippine courts assess force, intimidation, and victim testimony in rape cases, explained through a landmark Supreme Court ruling.

Incestuous Rape in the Philippines: Understanding the Law and Seeking Justice

Learn how Philippine courts handle incestuous rape cases, the penalties involved, and the legal remedies available to victims.

Inadmissible Confessions and Rape Convictions: Lessons from People v. Antipona

A father's rape conviction upheld by the Supreme Court, clarifying evidentiary rules and damages in incestuous rape cases.

Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Prior Relationship

Philippine Supreme Court acquits rape accused on reasonable doubt, citing inconsistent testimony and prior intimate relationship between complainant and accused.

Self-Defense Claims in Parricide and Rape Cases: What the Supreme Court Says

A father convicted of raping his daughter claimed self-defense. The Supreme Court explains why this defense fails in parricide and rape cases.

Rape of a Minor by a Parent: Credibility and Defenses in Philippine Law

How Philippine courts assess a child victim's testimony in incestuous rape cases and why minor inconsistencies do not destroy credibility.

Child Testimony in Rape Cases: Credibility and Legal Standards in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies standards for crediting child testimony in rape cases, affirming conviction based on victims' narrations.

Why a Victim’s Testimony Can Be Enough to Convict in Rape Cases

The Supreme Court explains when a rape victim’s sole testimony suffices for conviction and why resistance is not always required.

Rape Conviction Affirmed: Lessons on Credibility and Damages in Philippine Law

A father's rape conviction upheld; the Supreme Court clarifies credibility rules, alibi, and damages awards in incestuous rape cases.

Consent and Rape: Understanding the Nuances of Sexual Assault in the Philippines

The Bawar case shows how Philippine courts weigh consent, credibility, and behavior in rape cases—crucial for understanding sexual assault law.

Circumstantial Evidence and Reasonable Doubt Protecting the Accused in Philippine Law

How Philippine courts weigh circumstantial evidence and reasonable doubt to protect the accused, explained through a landmark rape case.

How Philippine Courts Weigh Identification and Alibi in Robbery with Rape Cases

A 1996 Supreme Court ruling clarifies when victim identification prevails over alibi and how courts distinguish robbery from robbery with rape.

Circumstantial Evidence in Rape Cases: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

How the Supreme Court upheld a rape-homicide conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence, and what this means for Philippine criminal prosecutions.

Credibility of Child Testimony in Rape Cases: Lessons from People v. Gabris

How Philippine courts assess a child rape victim's testimony, and why minor inconsistencies do not destroy credibility.

Rape Conviction Understanding Credibility OF Witnesses AND Victim Testimony IN Philippine LAW

Philippine courts rely on credible witness testimony in rape cases. This article explains how trial courts assess victim credibility and prosecution evidence.

Statutory Rape in the Philippines: Understanding Consent and Penalties

Learn how Philippine courts handle statutory rape cases, from consent rules to penalties, based on a landmark Supreme Court ruling.

Judicial Accountability: Why Courts Must Follow Procedure in Capital Cases

Philippine Supreme Court annuls death sentence in rape case, reminding trial courts that guilty pleas in capital offenses require full evidentiary proof.

Rape Conviction and Credibility: How Intimidation and Witness Testimony Shape Philippine Rape Cases

A look at how Philippine courts weigh witness credibility and intimidation in rape cases, based on a 1996 Supreme Court ruling.

Rape Conviction and Identification: Understanding the Burden of Proof in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies proof beyond reasonable doubt in rape cases, distinguishing positive identification from mere speculation.

Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: The Imperative of Voluntariness in Rape Cases

In People v. Subido, the Supreme Court acquitted a rape accused, emphasizing that the prosecution must prove force and lack of voluntariness beyond reasonable doubt.