From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 6217–6240 of 18,164 articles for “supreme court”

Upholding Employee Rights NPC Employees Entitled TO Separation PAY Despite Corporate Restructuring

Supreme Court rules NPC illegally dismissed employees entitled to separation pay, backwages despite corporate restructuring under EPIRA.

Concubinage, Condonation, and the Ombudsman's Power: Key Lessons from Busuego v. Ombudsman

The Supreme Court clarifies when a wife's knowledge of infidelity amounts to condonation of concubinage, and affirms the Ombudsman's broad investigative powers over public officers.

Default Judgments and Due Process: Proving Ownership Claims in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that default judgments still require proof of claims, and bare allegations cannot establish ownership of property.

Novation vs Alternative Obligations: Clearing the Confusion in Contract Law

When does a new agreement extinguish an old debt? The Supreme Court clarifies novation versus alternative obligations in this contract law case.

Injunctions and Mortgage Foreclosure: Balancing Creditor Rights and Preventing Irreparable Harm

The Supreme Court clarifies when preliminary injunctions may stop mortgage foreclosures, emphasizing that courts must protect only rights that clearly exist.

Rheumatoid Arthritis and Seafarers' Rights: Proving Work-Related Illness for Disability Benefits

Understand how the Supreme Court ruled that a seafarer's rheumatoid arthritis can be compensable as a work-related illness under the POEA-SEC.

Ejectment Cases: Immediate Execution Despite Appeal Under Rule 70

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on immediate execution of ejectment judgments despite appeal, explained in plain language.

Unbroken Chain Upholding Convictions In Drug Cases Through Evidence Integrity

The Supreme Court affirms drug convictions, ruling that substantial compliance with Section 21, RA 9165 suffices when evidence integrity is preserved.

Court Employee Accountability: Inefficiency and Incompetence in Judicial Service

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on court interpreter's administrative liability for inefficiency, incompetence, and failure to perform official duties.

Partition Rights CO Ownership VS Prior Judgment IN Philippine Property LAW

Supreme Court clarifies that a default judgment cannot substitute for proof of co-ownership, and a tax declaration alone does not establish title.

Chain of Custody and the Presumption of Innocence in Philippine Drug Cases

Why the Supreme Court acquitted a drug suspect when police broke the chain of custody rule.

Chain of Custody in Drug Cases: When Police Lapses Lead to Acquittal

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that police non-compliance with Section 21, RA 9165 chain of custody rules can defeat drug prosecutions.

Bigamy and the Need for a Judicial Declaration of Nullity Before Remarriage

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that contracting a second marriage without first securing a judicial declaration of nullity of the first constitutes bigamy.

Duress in Mortgage Contracts: Reasonable Fear and Legal Claims Under Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when fear or duress voids a mortgage, and why threatening a legal claim does not vitiate consent.

Credibility of Child Testimony in Rape Cases: When Doubt Leads to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquitted a rape accused due to reasonable doubt, examining how courts must scrutinize child testimony and prosecution evidence.

Warrantless Arrest and Admissibility of Evidence: Safeguarding Rights in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court explains when a warrantless arrest is lawful and how evidence seized incident to that arrest remains admissible in drug cases.

Writ of Possession and Third-Party Rights in Extrajudicial Foreclosure Sales

When can a writ of possession be issued despite a third party's possession of foreclosed property? The Supreme Court clarifies the rule.

Reinstatement vs Return to Work: Clarifying Employment Rights After a Transfer

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that reinstatement only applies to illegal dismissal, while a valid transfer requires a return to work order.

When Illegal Strike Actions Override Reinstatement Orders: Supervening Events in Labor Law

The Supreme Court clarifies when a final reinstatement order may yield to supervening events, including findings of illegal strike acts.

Bidding Rules and Government's Right to Reject: Protecting Public Interest in Privatization

Supreme Court affirms government's right to reject bids in privatization auctions, protecting public interest over bidder expectations.

Rape Conviction Upheld: Child Witness Credibility and the Hymenal Laceration Myth

The Supreme Court affirms a grandfather's qualified rape conviction, holding that an intact hymen does not negate rape and that a child's credible testimony suffices.

Termination Due to Illness in the Philippines: Balancing Employer Rights and Employee Protection

The Supreme Court clarifies when employers may validly terminate employees due to disease, and the procedural due process required under Philippine labor law.

Untimely Appeal Strict Deadlines For VAT Refund Claims In The Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120-day and 30-day deadlines for VAT refund claims, including the exception for premature judicial filings.

Strict Compliance: The Mandatory Nature of VAT Refund Periods Under the NIRC

The Supreme Court rules that the 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims are mandatory and jurisdictional, dismissing a belated judicial claim.